Relationship between Asphalt Binder Parameters and Asphalt Mixture Rutting

Ramadan Salim, Akshay Gundla, Ali Zalghout, B. Shane Underwood, Kamil Kaloush

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The selection and specification of asphalt binder is one of the factors that ultimately affect the long-term performance of asphalt pavements. Many agencies currently follow AASHTO M320 for their binder specifications, where the ratio of dynamic modulus to the sine of the phase angle, |G*|/sinδ, is the binder rutting parameter. However, an alternative now exists, AASHTO M332, which uses the non-recovered creep compliance, J nr, for this purpose. In this paper, the relative merits of these two parameters are compared using experimental results from 21 different asphalt mixtures from Arizona. The rutting parameters according to AASHTO M332 and M320 were determined for each of the binders in these mixtures and, for each mixture, two rutting performance tests were conducted: Hamburg wheel tracking test and repeated load permanent deformation test. The two binder rutting parameters demonstrated very high correlation to one another for non-polymer modified asphalts, but inconsistent correlation for polymer modified asphalts. Both Hamburg wheel tracking tests and repeated load permanent deformation tests showed positive correlations to both |G*|/sinδ and Jnr. It was concluded that, while both parameters showed good correlation, the Jnr of the binder relates better to mixture rutting than does |G*|/sinδ. Considering the results in this study, it is believed that Jnr is a slightly better rutting parameter for binder specifications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalTransportation Research Record
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Asphalt mixtures
Asphalt
Binders
Specifications
Wheels
Asphalt pavements
Creep
Polymers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Mechanical Engineering

Cite this

Relationship between Asphalt Binder Parameters and Asphalt Mixture Rutting. / Salim, Ramadan; Gundla, Akshay; Zalghout, Ali; Underwood, B. Shane; Kaloush, Kamil.

In: Transportation Research Record, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Salim, Ramadan ; Gundla, Akshay ; Zalghout, Ali ; Underwood, B. Shane ; Kaloush, Kamil. / Relationship between Asphalt Binder Parameters and Asphalt Mixture Rutting. In: Transportation Research Record. 2019.
@article{cd23430bfc0b45fdb09a3a89cbc54d48,
title = "Relationship between Asphalt Binder Parameters and Asphalt Mixture Rutting",
abstract = "The selection and specification of asphalt binder is one of the factors that ultimately affect the long-term performance of asphalt pavements. Many agencies currently follow AASHTO M320 for their binder specifications, where the ratio of dynamic modulus to the sine of the phase angle, |G*|/sinδ, is the binder rutting parameter. However, an alternative now exists, AASHTO M332, which uses the non-recovered creep compliance, J nr, for this purpose. In this paper, the relative merits of these two parameters are compared using experimental results from 21 different asphalt mixtures from Arizona. The rutting parameters according to AASHTO M332 and M320 were determined for each of the binders in these mixtures and, for each mixture, two rutting performance tests were conducted: Hamburg wheel tracking test and repeated load permanent deformation test. The two binder rutting parameters demonstrated very high correlation to one another for non-polymer modified asphalts, but inconsistent correlation for polymer modified asphalts. Both Hamburg wheel tracking tests and repeated load permanent deformation tests showed positive correlations to both |G*|/sinδ and Jnr. It was concluded that, while both parameters showed good correlation, the Jnr of the binder relates better to mixture rutting than does |G*|/sinδ. Considering the results in this study, it is believed that Jnr is a slightly better rutting parameter for binder specifications.",
author = "Ramadan Salim and Akshay Gundla and Ali Zalghout and Underwood, {B. Shane} and Kamil Kaloush",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0361198119842129",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Transportation Research Record",
issn = "0361-1981",
publisher = "US National Research Council",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relationship between Asphalt Binder Parameters and Asphalt Mixture Rutting

AU - Salim, Ramadan

AU - Gundla, Akshay

AU - Zalghout, Ali

AU - Underwood, B. Shane

AU - Kaloush, Kamil

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - The selection and specification of asphalt binder is one of the factors that ultimately affect the long-term performance of asphalt pavements. Many agencies currently follow AASHTO M320 for their binder specifications, where the ratio of dynamic modulus to the sine of the phase angle, |G*|/sinδ, is the binder rutting parameter. However, an alternative now exists, AASHTO M332, which uses the non-recovered creep compliance, J nr, for this purpose. In this paper, the relative merits of these two parameters are compared using experimental results from 21 different asphalt mixtures from Arizona. The rutting parameters according to AASHTO M332 and M320 were determined for each of the binders in these mixtures and, for each mixture, two rutting performance tests were conducted: Hamburg wheel tracking test and repeated load permanent deformation test. The two binder rutting parameters demonstrated very high correlation to one another for non-polymer modified asphalts, but inconsistent correlation for polymer modified asphalts. Both Hamburg wheel tracking tests and repeated load permanent deformation tests showed positive correlations to both |G*|/sinδ and Jnr. It was concluded that, while both parameters showed good correlation, the Jnr of the binder relates better to mixture rutting than does |G*|/sinδ. Considering the results in this study, it is believed that Jnr is a slightly better rutting parameter for binder specifications.

AB - The selection and specification of asphalt binder is one of the factors that ultimately affect the long-term performance of asphalt pavements. Many agencies currently follow AASHTO M320 for their binder specifications, where the ratio of dynamic modulus to the sine of the phase angle, |G*|/sinδ, is the binder rutting parameter. However, an alternative now exists, AASHTO M332, which uses the non-recovered creep compliance, J nr, for this purpose. In this paper, the relative merits of these two parameters are compared using experimental results from 21 different asphalt mixtures from Arizona. The rutting parameters according to AASHTO M332 and M320 were determined for each of the binders in these mixtures and, for each mixture, two rutting performance tests were conducted: Hamburg wheel tracking test and repeated load permanent deformation test. The two binder rutting parameters demonstrated very high correlation to one another for non-polymer modified asphalts, but inconsistent correlation for polymer modified asphalts. Both Hamburg wheel tracking tests and repeated load permanent deformation tests showed positive correlations to both |G*|/sinδ and Jnr. It was concluded that, while both parameters showed good correlation, the Jnr of the binder relates better to mixture rutting than does |G*|/sinδ. Considering the results in this study, it is believed that Jnr is a slightly better rutting parameter for binder specifications.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85067847042&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85067847042&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0361198119842129

DO - 10.1177/0361198119842129

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85067847042

JO - Transportation Research Record

JF - Transportation Research Record

SN - 0361-1981

ER -