Relational mechanisms governing multifaceted collaborative behavior of academic scientists in six fields of science and engineering

Yamini Jha, Eric Welch

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Norms of academic science and engineering are moving in the direction of broader applicability and transferability of knowledge beyond the borders of the university. In response, scientists are expected to engage in collaboration that includes both basic and applied collaborative activities. More specifically, the norms of science are beginning to change to allow for novel forms of collaboration that involve sharing of research ideas on multiple facets of collaborative work. This paper examines the extent to which multifaceted collaboration is attributable to relational aspects of individuals' networks. Specifically, we ask the question: what relational aspects of social capital determine multifaceted collaboration among scientists in six fields of science and engineering? Borrowing literature from social capital and science and technology (S&T) human capital, this paper develops a multi-level model of multifaceted collaboration and presents a set of testable hypotheses. Then using data from a national survey of men and women faculty in six fields, we analyze the multi-level data: relationship or dyad level (level 1) and ego level (level 2) with hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) to predict multifaceted collaboration of academic scientists. Findings show that some relational characteristics explain multifaceted collaborative behavior as predicted, while others behave in unexpected ways. Conclusions place the findings in context for theory and policy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1174-1184
Number of pages11
JournalResearch Policy
Volume39
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Social capital
Collaborative work
Multilevel models
Transferability
Social sciences
Borrowing
Dyads
Hierarchical linear modeling
Human capital

Keywords

  • Heterophily
  • Homophily
  • Multifaceted collaboration
  • Relational
  • Scientists

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)
  • Management of Technology and Innovation
  • Strategy and Management
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Cite this

Relational mechanisms governing multifaceted collaborative behavior of academic scientists in six fields of science and engineering. / Jha, Yamini; Welch, Eric.

In: Research Policy, Vol. 39, No. 9, 11.2010, p. 1174-1184.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0fa9d522e3564cc0aa71e645bd6a1338,
title = "Relational mechanisms governing multifaceted collaborative behavior of academic scientists in six fields of science and engineering",
abstract = "Norms of academic science and engineering are moving in the direction of broader applicability and transferability of knowledge beyond the borders of the university. In response, scientists are expected to engage in collaboration that includes both basic and applied collaborative activities. More specifically, the norms of science are beginning to change to allow for novel forms of collaboration that involve sharing of research ideas on multiple facets of collaborative work. This paper examines the extent to which multifaceted collaboration is attributable to relational aspects of individuals' networks. Specifically, we ask the question: what relational aspects of social capital determine multifaceted collaboration among scientists in six fields of science and engineering? Borrowing literature from social capital and science and technology (S&T) human capital, this paper develops a multi-level model of multifaceted collaboration and presents a set of testable hypotheses. Then using data from a national survey of men and women faculty in six fields, we analyze the multi-level data: relationship or dyad level (level 1) and ego level (level 2) with hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) to predict multifaceted collaboration of academic scientists. Findings show that some relational characteristics explain multifaceted collaborative behavior as predicted, while others behave in unexpected ways. Conclusions place the findings in context for theory and policy.",
keywords = "Heterophily, Homophily, Multifaceted collaboration, Relational, Scientists",
author = "Yamini Jha and Eric Welch",
year = "2010",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.respol.2010.06.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "1174--1184",
journal = "Research Policy",
issn = "0048-7333",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relational mechanisms governing multifaceted collaborative behavior of academic scientists in six fields of science and engineering

AU - Jha, Yamini

AU - Welch, Eric

PY - 2010/11

Y1 - 2010/11

N2 - Norms of academic science and engineering are moving in the direction of broader applicability and transferability of knowledge beyond the borders of the university. In response, scientists are expected to engage in collaboration that includes both basic and applied collaborative activities. More specifically, the norms of science are beginning to change to allow for novel forms of collaboration that involve sharing of research ideas on multiple facets of collaborative work. This paper examines the extent to which multifaceted collaboration is attributable to relational aspects of individuals' networks. Specifically, we ask the question: what relational aspects of social capital determine multifaceted collaboration among scientists in six fields of science and engineering? Borrowing literature from social capital and science and technology (S&T) human capital, this paper develops a multi-level model of multifaceted collaboration and presents a set of testable hypotheses. Then using data from a national survey of men and women faculty in six fields, we analyze the multi-level data: relationship or dyad level (level 1) and ego level (level 2) with hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) to predict multifaceted collaboration of academic scientists. Findings show that some relational characteristics explain multifaceted collaborative behavior as predicted, while others behave in unexpected ways. Conclusions place the findings in context for theory and policy.

AB - Norms of academic science and engineering are moving in the direction of broader applicability and transferability of knowledge beyond the borders of the university. In response, scientists are expected to engage in collaboration that includes both basic and applied collaborative activities. More specifically, the norms of science are beginning to change to allow for novel forms of collaboration that involve sharing of research ideas on multiple facets of collaborative work. This paper examines the extent to which multifaceted collaboration is attributable to relational aspects of individuals' networks. Specifically, we ask the question: what relational aspects of social capital determine multifaceted collaboration among scientists in six fields of science and engineering? Borrowing literature from social capital and science and technology (S&T) human capital, this paper develops a multi-level model of multifaceted collaboration and presents a set of testable hypotheses. Then using data from a national survey of men and women faculty in six fields, we analyze the multi-level data: relationship or dyad level (level 1) and ego level (level 2) with hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) to predict multifaceted collaboration of academic scientists. Findings show that some relational characteristics explain multifaceted collaborative behavior as predicted, while others behave in unexpected ways. Conclusions place the findings in context for theory and policy.

KW - Heterophily

KW - Homophily

KW - Multifaceted collaboration

KW - Relational

KW - Scientists

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957219940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957219940&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.respol.2010.06.003

DO - 10.1016/j.respol.2010.06.003

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:77957219940

VL - 39

SP - 1174

EP - 1184

JO - Research Policy

JF - Research Policy

SN - 0048-7333

IS - 9

ER -