Regulatory policymaking in the American States: A review of theories and evidence

Brian Gerber, Paul Teske

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

75 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

While most studies of the determinants of regulatory policymaking have concentrated on national-level issues, state-level regulatory politics represent a productive opportunity to examine the efficacy of competing theories of the regulatory process over variable political, economic, and demographic conditions. In this article we discuss the significance of state-level regulation to broader theoretical understandings of policymaking. We review a broad set of recent empirical work in the context of three models of policymaking: principal-agent theory, Gormley's salience and complexity model, and Lowry's dimensions of federalism model. The relative effectiveness of the three approaches in explaining the dynamics of political controls or influences over state-level regulation is assessed in order to point to future theoretic directions for the field. We conclude by suggesting the need for a greater integration of incentive-based and issues-based explanations of regulatory policy choices in the states.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)849-886
Number of pages38
JournalPolitical Research Quarterly
Volume53
Issue number4
StatePublished - Dec 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

principal-agent-theory
evidence
regulation
political control
regulatory policy
political influence
federalism
incentive
determinants
politics
economics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Regulatory policymaking in the American States : A review of theories and evidence. / Gerber, Brian; Teske, Paul.

In: Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 53, No. 4, 12.2000, p. 849-886.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0079bb5c4658405a89f20d69d3f1bf91,
title = "Regulatory policymaking in the American States: A review of theories and evidence",
abstract = "While most studies of the determinants of regulatory policymaking have concentrated on national-level issues, state-level regulatory politics represent a productive opportunity to examine the efficacy of competing theories of the regulatory process over variable political, economic, and demographic conditions. In this article we discuss the significance of state-level regulation to broader theoretical understandings of policymaking. We review a broad set of recent empirical work in the context of three models of policymaking: principal-agent theory, Gormley's salience and complexity model, and Lowry's dimensions of federalism model. The relative effectiveness of the three approaches in explaining the dynamics of political controls or influences over state-level regulation is assessed in order to point to future theoretic directions for the field. We conclude by suggesting the need for a greater integration of incentive-based and issues-based explanations of regulatory policy choices in the states.",
author = "Brian Gerber and Paul Teske",
year = "2000",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "53",
pages = "849--886",
journal = "Political Research Quarterly",
issn = "1065-9129",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regulatory policymaking in the American States

T2 - A review of theories and evidence

AU - Gerber, Brian

AU - Teske, Paul

PY - 2000/12

Y1 - 2000/12

N2 - While most studies of the determinants of regulatory policymaking have concentrated on national-level issues, state-level regulatory politics represent a productive opportunity to examine the efficacy of competing theories of the regulatory process over variable political, economic, and demographic conditions. In this article we discuss the significance of state-level regulation to broader theoretical understandings of policymaking. We review a broad set of recent empirical work in the context of three models of policymaking: principal-agent theory, Gormley's salience and complexity model, and Lowry's dimensions of federalism model. The relative effectiveness of the three approaches in explaining the dynamics of political controls or influences over state-level regulation is assessed in order to point to future theoretic directions for the field. We conclude by suggesting the need for a greater integration of incentive-based and issues-based explanations of regulatory policy choices in the states.

AB - While most studies of the determinants of regulatory policymaking have concentrated on national-level issues, state-level regulatory politics represent a productive opportunity to examine the efficacy of competing theories of the regulatory process over variable political, economic, and demographic conditions. In this article we discuss the significance of state-level regulation to broader theoretical understandings of policymaking. We review a broad set of recent empirical work in the context of three models of policymaking: principal-agent theory, Gormley's salience and complexity model, and Lowry's dimensions of federalism model. The relative effectiveness of the three approaches in explaining the dynamics of political controls or influences over state-level regulation is assessed in order to point to future theoretic directions for the field. We conclude by suggesting the need for a greater integration of incentive-based and issues-based explanations of regulatory policy choices in the states.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034560880&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034560880&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0034560880

VL - 53

SP - 849

EP - 886

JO - Political Research Quarterly

JF - Political Research Quarterly

SN - 1065-9129

IS - 4

ER -