Regulating carbon emissions from indirect land use change (ILUC): U.S. and California case studies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As lifecycle emissions accounting becomes more widely used in policy, it is important to understand how it has been applied. This paper analyses policy-making for two U.S. fuel regulations—the federal Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) and the California Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS)—that were pioneering not only in using life cycle assessment (LCA) in performance-based environmental regulations, but especially for including emissions from indirect land use change (ILUC). The case studies in this paper focus, in particular, on the decision to include ILUC in lifecycle emissions accounting. Tracing the development of these policies shows the key role of environmental policy entrepreneurs in advocating for ILUC emissions accounting during policy formulation. Moreover, it highlights a paradox in the use of science: although ILUC policy proponents were motivated by best available research, they were also politically enabled by scientific uncertainty and lack of understanding. Understanding this political dimension of decision-making is valuable for scholars as well as practitioners facing similar decisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)25-31
Number of pages7
JournalEnvironmental Science and Policy
Volume77
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2017

Fingerprint

carbon emission
land use change
land use
life cycle assessment
entrepreneur
policy making
environmental policy
life cycle
decision making
uncertainty
regulation
policy
lack
carbon
science
performance
accounting
decision

Keywords

  • Biofuels
  • Environmental governance
  • Indirect land use change (ILUC)
  • Policy entrepreneur
  • Process tracing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

@article{4a330b7ede774232ab2cea7523932802,
title = "Regulating carbon emissions from indirect land use change (ILUC): U.S. and California case studies",
abstract = "As lifecycle emissions accounting becomes more widely used in policy, it is important to understand how it has been applied. This paper analyses policy-making for two U.S. fuel regulations—the federal Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) and the California Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS)—that were pioneering not only in using life cycle assessment (LCA) in performance-based environmental regulations, but especially for including emissions from indirect land use change (ILUC). The case studies in this paper focus, in particular, on the decision to include ILUC in lifecycle emissions accounting. Tracing the development of these policies shows the key role of environmental policy entrepreneurs in advocating for ILUC emissions accounting during policy formulation. Moreover, it highlights a paradox in the use of science: although ILUC policy proponents were motivated by best available research, they were also politically enabled by scientific uncertainty and lack of understanding. Understanding this political dimension of decision-making is valuable for scholars as well as practitioners facing similar decisions.",
keywords = "Biofuels, Environmental governance, Indirect land use change (ILUC), Policy entrepreneur, Process tracing",
author = "Hanna Breetz",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.016",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "77",
pages = "25--31",
journal = "Environmental Science and Policy",
issn = "1462-9011",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regulating carbon emissions from indirect land use change (ILUC)

T2 - U.S. and California case studies

AU - Breetz, Hanna

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - As lifecycle emissions accounting becomes more widely used in policy, it is important to understand how it has been applied. This paper analyses policy-making for two U.S. fuel regulations—the federal Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) and the California Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS)—that were pioneering not only in using life cycle assessment (LCA) in performance-based environmental regulations, but especially for including emissions from indirect land use change (ILUC). The case studies in this paper focus, in particular, on the decision to include ILUC in lifecycle emissions accounting. Tracing the development of these policies shows the key role of environmental policy entrepreneurs in advocating for ILUC emissions accounting during policy formulation. Moreover, it highlights a paradox in the use of science: although ILUC policy proponents were motivated by best available research, they were also politically enabled by scientific uncertainty and lack of understanding. Understanding this political dimension of decision-making is valuable for scholars as well as practitioners facing similar decisions.

AB - As lifecycle emissions accounting becomes more widely used in policy, it is important to understand how it has been applied. This paper analyses policy-making for two U.S. fuel regulations—the federal Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) and the California Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS)—that were pioneering not only in using life cycle assessment (LCA) in performance-based environmental regulations, but especially for including emissions from indirect land use change (ILUC). The case studies in this paper focus, in particular, on the decision to include ILUC in lifecycle emissions accounting. Tracing the development of these policies shows the key role of environmental policy entrepreneurs in advocating for ILUC emissions accounting during policy formulation. Moreover, it highlights a paradox in the use of science: although ILUC policy proponents were motivated by best available research, they were also politically enabled by scientific uncertainty and lack of understanding. Understanding this political dimension of decision-making is valuable for scholars as well as practitioners facing similar decisions.

KW - Biofuels

KW - Environmental governance

KW - Indirect land use change (ILUC)

KW - Policy entrepreneur

KW - Process tracing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026446864&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026446864&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.016

DO - 10.1016/j.envsci.2017.07.016

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85026446864

VL - 77

SP - 25

EP - 31

JO - Environmental Science and Policy

JF - Environmental Science and Policy

SN - 1462-9011

ER -