Reforming stop-and-frisk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Although stop-and-frisk has a long history as a policing tactic rooted in particularized, reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, several U.S. jurisdictions morphed stop-and-frisk into a broad and sometimes aggressive crimecontrol strategy. The recent experiences in many jurisdictions demonstrate a strong disconnect between constitutionally sanctioned principles and policing practice. Arguably, stop-and-frisk has become the next iteration of a persistent undercurrent in racial injustice in American policing. Although stop-and-frisk has a legitimate place in 21st-century policing, changes must be made to prevent officers from engaging in racially biased or otherwise improper and illegal behavior during stops of citizens. Recommended reforms include better selection of police personnel during recruitment, improved training, clearer administrative policies, enhanced supervision of officers with corresponding accountability mechanisms, and external oversight.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)45-65
Number of pages21
JournalCriminology, Criminal Justice, Law and Society
Volume18
Issue number3
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

jurisdiction
administrative policy
tactics
supervision
personnel
police
citizen
reform
responsibility
history
experience

Keywords

  • Criminal justice policy reform
  • Policing
  • Race and justice
  • Stop-and-frisk

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Reforming stop-and-frisk. / Fradella, Henry; White, Michael.

In: Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law and Society, Vol. 18, No. 3, 01.01.2017, p. 45-65.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{750aabbea634492f968b46a3a59ed5bc,
title = "Reforming stop-and-frisk",
abstract = "Although stop-and-frisk has a long history as a policing tactic rooted in particularized, reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, several U.S. jurisdictions morphed stop-and-frisk into a broad and sometimes aggressive crimecontrol strategy. The recent experiences in many jurisdictions demonstrate a strong disconnect between constitutionally sanctioned principles and policing practice. Arguably, stop-and-frisk has become the next iteration of a persistent undercurrent in racial injustice in American policing. Although stop-and-frisk has a legitimate place in 21st-century policing, changes must be made to prevent officers from engaging in racially biased or otherwise improper and illegal behavior during stops of citizens. Recommended reforms include better selection of police personnel during recruitment, improved training, clearer administrative policies, enhanced supervision of officers with corresponding accountability mechanisms, and external oversight.",
keywords = "Criminal justice policy reform, Policing, Race and justice, Stop-and-frisk",
author = "Henry Fradella and Michael White",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "45--65",
journal = "Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law and Society",
issn = "2332-886X",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reforming stop-and-frisk

AU - Fradella, Henry

AU - White, Michael

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Although stop-and-frisk has a long history as a policing tactic rooted in particularized, reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, several U.S. jurisdictions morphed stop-and-frisk into a broad and sometimes aggressive crimecontrol strategy. The recent experiences in many jurisdictions demonstrate a strong disconnect between constitutionally sanctioned principles and policing practice. Arguably, stop-and-frisk has become the next iteration of a persistent undercurrent in racial injustice in American policing. Although stop-and-frisk has a legitimate place in 21st-century policing, changes must be made to prevent officers from engaging in racially biased or otherwise improper and illegal behavior during stops of citizens. Recommended reforms include better selection of police personnel during recruitment, improved training, clearer administrative policies, enhanced supervision of officers with corresponding accountability mechanisms, and external oversight.

AB - Although stop-and-frisk has a long history as a policing tactic rooted in particularized, reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, several U.S. jurisdictions morphed stop-and-frisk into a broad and sometimes aggressive crimecontrol strategy. The recent experiences in many jurisdictions demonstrate a strong disconnect between constitutionally sanctioned principles and policing practice. Arguably, stop-and-frisk has become the next iteration of a persistent undercurrent in racial injustice in American policing. Although stop-and-frisk has a legitimate place in 21st-century policing, changes must be made to prevent officers from engaging in racially biased or otherwise improper and illegal behavior during stops of citizens. Recommended reforms include better selection of police personnel during recruitment, improved training, clearer administrative policies, enhanced supervision of officers with corresponding accountability mechanisms, and external oversight.

KW - Criminal justice policy reform

KW - Policing

KW - Race and justice

KW - Stop-and-frisk

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059953474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059953474&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 45

EP - 65

JO - Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law and Society

JF - Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law and Society

SN - 2332-886X

IS - 3

ER -