TY - JOUR
T1 - Reevaluating Recovery
T2 - Perceived Violations and Preemptive Interventions on Emergency Psychiatry Rounds
AU - Cohen, Trevor
AU - Blatter, Brett
AU - Almeida, Carlos
AU - Patel, Vimla L.
PY - 2007/5
Y1 - 2007/5
N2 - Objective: Contemporary error research suggests that the quest to eradicate error is misguided. Error commission, detection, and recovery are an integral part of cognitive work, even at the expert level. In collaborative workspaces, the perception of potential error is directly observable: workers discuss and respond to perceived violations of accepted practice norms. As perceived violations are captured and corrected preemptively, they do not fit Reason's widely accepted definition of error as "failure to achieve an intended outcome." However, perceived violations suggest the aversion of potential error, and consequently have implications for error prevention. This research aims to identify and describe perceived violations of the boundaries of accepted procedure in a psychiatric emergency department (PED), and how they are resolved in practice. Design: Clinical discourse from fourteen PED patient rounds was audio-recorded. Excerpts from recordings suggesting perceived violations or incidents of miscommunication were extracted and analyzed using qualitative coding methods. The results are interpreted in relation to prior research on vulnerabilities to error in the PED. Results: Thirty incidents of perceived violations or miscommunication are identified and analyzed. Of these, only one medication error was formally reported. Other incidents would not have been detected by a retrospective analysis. Conclusions: The analysis of perceived violations expands the data available for error analysis beyond occasional reported adverse events. These data are prospective: responses are captured in real time. This analysis supports a set of recommendations to improve the quality of care in the PED and other critical care contexts.
AB - Objective: Contemporary error research suggests that the quest to eradicate error is misguided. Error commission, detection, and recovery are an integral part of cognitive work, even at the expert level. In collaborative workspaces, the perception of potential error is directly observable: workers discuss and respond to perceived violations of accepted practice norms. As perceived violations are captured and corrected preemptively, they do not fit Reason's widely accepted definition of error as "failure to achieve an intended outcome." However, perceived violations suggest the aversion of potential error, and consequently have implications for error prevention. This research aims to identify and describe perceived violations of the boundaries of accepted procedure in a psychiatric emergency department (PED), and how they are resolved in practice. Design: Clinical discourse from fourteen PED patient rounds was audio-recorded. Excerpts from recordings suggesting perceived violations or incidents of miscommunication were extracted and analyzed using qualitative coding methods. The results are interpreted in relation to prior research on vulnerabilities to error in the PED. Results: Thirty incidents of perceived violations or miscommunication are identified and analyzed. Of these, only one medication error was formally reported. Other incidents would not have been detected by a retrospective analysis. Conclusions: The analysis of perceived violations expands the data available for error analysis beyond occasional reported adverse events. These data are prospective: responses are captured in real time. This analysis supports a set of recommendations to improve the quality of care in the PED and other critical care contexts.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247360445&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247360445&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1197/jamia.M2245
DO - 10.1197/jamia.M2245
M3 - Article
C2 - 17329728
AN - SCOPUS:34247360445
SN - 1067-5027
VL - 14
SP - 312
EP - 319
JO - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
JF - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
IS - 3
ER -