Reevaluating Recovery: Perceived Violations and Preemptive Interventions on Emergency Psychiatry Rounds

Trevor Cohen, Brett Blatter, Carlos Almeida, Vimla Patel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Contemporary error research suggests that the quest to eradicate error is misguided. Error commission, detection, and recovery are an integral part of cognitive work, even at the expert level. In collaborative workspaces, the perception of potential error is directly observable: workers discuss and respond to perceived violations of accepted practice norms. As perceived violations are captured and corrected preemptively, they do not fit Reason's widely accepted definition of error as "failure to achieve an intended outcome." However, perceived violations suggest the aversion of potential error, and consequently have implications for error prevention. This research aims to identify and describe perceived violations of the boundaries of accepted procedure in a psychiatric emergency department (PED), and how they are resolved in practice. Design: Clinical discourse from fourteen PED patient rounds was audio-recorded. Excerpts from recordings suggesting perceived violations or incidents of miscommunication were extracted and analyzed using qualitative coding methods. The results are interpreted in relation to prior research on vulnerabilities to error in the PED. Results: Thirty incidents of perceived violations or miscommunication are identified and analyzed. Of these, only one medication error was formally reported. Other incidents would not have been detected by a retrospective analysis. Conclusions: The analysis of perceived violations expands the data available for error analysis beyond occasional reported adverse events. These data are prospective: responses are captured in real time. This analysis supports a set of recommendations to improve the quality of care in the PED and other critical care contexts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)312-319
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Volume14
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Psychiatry
Hospital Emergency Service
Emergencies
Research
Medication Errors
Quality of Health Care
Critical Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Reevaluating Recovery : Perceived Violations and Preemptive Interventions on Emergency Psychiatry Rounds. / Cohen, Trevor; Blatter, Brett; Almeida, Carlos; Patel, Vimla.

In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, Vol. 14, No. 3, 01.05.2007, p. 312-319.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cohen, Trevor ; Blatter, Brett ; Almeida, Carlos ; Patel, Vimla. / Reevaluating Recovery : Perceived Violations and Preemptive Interventions on Emergency Psychiatry Rounds. In: Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2007 ; Vol. 14, No. 3. pp. 312-319.
@article{be840233e109429f870db598dd0e2be0,
title = "Reevaluating Recovery: Perceived Violations and Preemptive Interventions on Emergency Psychiatry Rounds",
abstract = "Objective: Contemporary error research suggests that the quest to eradicate error is misguided. Error commission, detection, and recovery are an integral part of cognitive work, even at the expert level. In collaborative workspaces, the perception of potential error is directly observable: workers discuss and respond to perceived violations of accepted practice norms. As perceived violations are captured and corrected preemptively, they do not fit Reason's widely accepted definition of error as {"}failure to achieve an intended outcome.{"} However, perceived violations suggest the aversion of potential error, and consequently have implications for error prevention. This research aims to identify and describe perceived violations of the boundaries of accepted procedure in a psychiatric emergency department (PED), and how they are resolved in practice. Design: Clinical discourse from fourteen PED patient rounds was audio-recorded. Excerpts from recordings suggesting perceived violations or incidents of miscommunication were extracted and analyzed using qualitative coding methods. The results are interpreted in relation to prior research on vulnerabilities to error in the PED. Results: Thirty incidents of perceived violations or miscommunication are identified and analyzed. Of these, only one medication error was formally reported. Other incidents would not have been detected by a retrospective analysis. Conclusions: The analysis of perceived violations expands the data available for error analysis beyond occasional reported adverse events. These data are prospective: responses are captured in real time. This analysis supports a set of recommendations to improve the quality of care in the PED and other critical care contexts.",
author = "Trevor Cohen and Brett Blatter and Carlos Almeida and Vimla Patel",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1197/jamia.M2245",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "14",
pages = "312--319",
journal = "Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA",
issn = "1067-5027",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reevaluating Recovery

T2 - Perceived Violations and Preemptive Interventions on Emergency Psychiatry Rounds

AU - Cohen, Trevor

AU - Blatter, Brett

AU - Almeida, Carlos

AU - Patel, Vimla

PY - 2007/5/1

Y1 - 2007/5/1

N2 - Objective: Contemporary error research suggests that the quest to eradicate error is misguided. Error commission, detection, and recovery are an integral part of cognitive work, even at the expert level. In collaborative workspaces, the perception of potential error is directly observable: workers discuss and respond to perceived violations of accepted practice norms. As perceived violations are captured and corrected preemptively, they do not fit Reason's widely accepted definition of error as "failure to achieve an intended outcome." However, perceived violations suggest the aversion of potential error, and consequently have implications for error prevention. This research aims to identify and describe perceived violations of the boundaries of accepted procedure in a psychiatric emergency department (PED), and how they are resolved in practice. Design: Clinical discourse from fourteen PED patient rounds was audio-recorded. Excerpts from recordings suggesting perceived violations or incidents of miscommunication were extracted and analyzed using qualitative coding methods. The results are interpreted in relation to prior research on vulnerabilities to error in the PED. Results: Thirty incidents of perceived violations or miscommunication are identified and analyzed. Of these, only one medication error was formally reported. Other incidents would not have been detected by a retrospective analysis. Conclusions: The analysis of perceived violations expands the data available for error analysis beyond occasional reported adverse events. These data are prospective: responses are captured in real time. This analysis supports a set of recommendations to improve the quality of care in the PED and other critical care contexts.

AB - Objective: Contemporary error research suggests that the quest to eradicate error is misguided. Error commission, detection, and recovery are an integral part of cognitive work, even at the expert level. In collaborative workspaces, the perception of potential error is directly observable: workers discuss and respond to perceived violations of accepted practice norms. As perceived violations are captured and corrected preemptively, they do not fit Reason's widely accepted definition of error as "failure to achieve an intended outcome." However, perceived violations suggest the aversion of potential error, and consequently have implications for error prevention. This research aims to identify and describe perceived violations of the boundaries of accepted procedure in a psychiatric emergency department (PED), and how they are resolved in practice. Design: Clinical discourse from fourteen PED patient rounds was audio-recorded. Excerpts from recordings suggesting perceived violations or incidents of miscommunication were extracted and analyzed using qualitative coding methods. The results are interpreted in relation to prior research on vulnerabilities to error in the PED. Results: Thirty incidents of perceived violations or miscommunication are identified and analyzed. Of these, only one medication error was formally reported. Other incidents would not have been detected by a retrospective analysis. Conclusions: The analysis of perceived violations expands the data available for error analysis beyond occasional reported adverse events. These data are prospective: responses are captured in real time. This analysis supports a set of recommendations to improve the quality of care in the PED and other critical care contexts.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34247360445&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34247360445&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1197/jamia.M2245

DO - 10.1197/jamia.M2245

M3 - Article

C2 - 17329728

AN - SCOPUS:34247360445

VL - 14

SP - 312

EP - 319

JO - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

JF - Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA

SN - 1067-5027

IS - 3

ER -