Reducing variability in civil jury awards

Michael J. Saks, Lisa A. Holinger, L. Wissler, Lee Evans, Allen J. Hart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to test several procedures that could be adopted for reducing unwanted variability in civil damage awards. Four methods for providing guidance to jurors (and judges) about the distribution of awards in comparable cases were compared to each other, to a no-guidance control, and to the capping of awards at a specified maximum, which has been the most commonly legislated 'solution.' The findings of this study suggest several alternative solutions that are better able than caps to solve the problem of unwanted variability in awards.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)243-256
Number of pages14
JournalLaw and Human Behavior
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 4 1997
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Psychology(all)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Law

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reducing variability in civil jury awards'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Saks, M. J., Holinger, L. A., Wissler, L., Evans, L., & Hart, A. J. (1997). Reducing variability in civil jury awards. Law and Human Behavior, 21(3), 243-256. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024834614312