Reducing variability in civil jury awards

Michael Saks, Lisa A. Holinger, L. Wissler, Lee Evans, Allen J. Hart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to test several procedures that could be adopted for reducing unwanted variability in civil damage awards. Four methods for providing guidance to jurors (and judges) about the distribution of awards in comparable cases were compared to each other, to a no-guidance control, and to the capping of awards at a specified maximum, which has been the most commonly legislated 'solution.' The findings of this study suggest several alternative solutions that are better able than caps to solve the problem of unwanted variability in awards.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)243-256
Number of pages14
JournalLaw and Human Behavior
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

damages
Guidance
Juries
Jurors
Damage

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Psychology(all)
  • Social Psychology

Cite this

Saks, M., Holinger, L. A., Wissler, L., Evans, L., & Hart, A. J. (1997). Reducing variability in civil jury awards. Law and Human Behavior, 21(3), 243-256. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024834614312

Reducing variability in civil jury awards. / Saks, Michael; Holinger, Lisa A.; Wissler, L.; Evans, Lee; Hart, Allen J.

In: Law and Human Behavior, Vol. 21, No. 3, 1997, p. 243-256.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Saks, M, Holinger, LA, Wissler, L, Evans, L & Hart, AJ 1997, 'Reducing variability in civil jury awards', Law and Human Behavior, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 243-256. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024834614312
Saks, Michael ; Holinger, Lisa A. ; Wissler, L. ; Evans, Lee ; Hart, Allen J. / Reducing variability in civil jury awards. In: Law and Human Behavior. 1997 ; Vol. 21, No. 3. pp. 243-256.
@article{39e17378075a4df8b4f182eb795c10de,
title = "Reducing variability in civil jury awards",
abstract = "The purpose of the present study was to test several procedures that could be adopted for reducing unwanted variability in civil damage awards. Four methods for providing guidance to jurors (and judges) about the distribution of awards in comparable cases were compared to each other, to a no-guidance control, and to the capping of awards at a specified maximum, which has been the most commonly legislated 'solution.' The findings of this study suggest several alternative solutions that are better able than caps to solve the problem of unwanted variability in awards.",
author = "Michael Saks and Holinger, {Lisa A.} and L. Wissler and Lee Evans and Hart, {Allen J.}",
year = "1997",
doi = "10.1023/A:1024834614312",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "243--256",
journal = "Law and Human Behavior",
issn = "0147-7307",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reducing variability in civil jury awards

AU - Saks, Michael

AU - Holinger, Lisa A.

AU - Wissler, L.

AU - Evans, Lee

AU - Hart, Allen J.

PY - 1997

Y1 - 1997

N2 - The purpose of the present study was to test several procedures that could be adopted for reducing unwanted variability in civil damage awards. Four methods for providing guidance to jurors (and judges) about the distribution of awards in comparable cases were compared to each other, to a no-guidance control, and to the capping of awards at a specified maximum, which has been the most commonly legislated 'solution.' The findings of this study suggest several alternative solutions that are better able than caps to solve the problem of unwanted variability in awards.

AB - The purpose of the present study was to test several procedures that could be adopted for reducing unwanted variability in civil damage awards. Four methods for providing guidance to jurors (and judges) about the distribution of awards in comparable cases were compared to each other, to a no-guidance control, and to the capping of awards at a specified maximum, which has been the most commonly legislated 'solution.' The findings of this study suggest several alternative solutions that are better able than caps to solve the problem of unwanted variability in awards.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030961791&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030961791&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1023/A:1024834614312

DO - 10.1023/A:1024834614312

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0030961791

VL - 21

SP - 243

EP - 256

JO - Law and Human Behavior

JF - Law and Human Behavior

SN - 0147-7307

IS - 3

ER -