Reconsidering the null hypothesis: Is maternal rank associated with birth sex ratios in primate groups?

Gillian R. Brown, Joan Silk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

96 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Trivers and Willard hypothesized that vertebrates adaptively vary the sex ratio of their offspring in response to the mother's physical condition [Trivers, R. L. & Willard, D. (1973) Science 179, 90-92]. This hypothesis has produced considerable debate within evolutionary biology. Here we use meta-analysis techniques to evaluate claims that nonhuman primate females facultatively adjust the sex ratio of their progeny in relation to their own dominance rank in a uniform way. The magnitude of the difference in birth sex ratios of high- and low-ranking females declines as sample sizes increase, and the men difference in birth sex ratios of high- and low-ranking females is zero. These results suggest that the observed effects could be the product of stochastic variation in small samples. These findings indicate that presently we cannot reject the null hypothesis that maternal dominance rank is unrelated to birth sex ratios.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)11252-11255
Number of pages4
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Volume99
Issue number17
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 20 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Sex Ratio
Primates
Mothers
Parturition
Sample Size
Vertebrates
Meta-Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics
  • General

Cite this

@article{9d774fd374f44554bb20512e128e0012,
title = "Reconsidering the null hypothesis: Is maternal rank associated with birth sex ratios in primate groups?",
abstract = "Trivers and Willard hypothesized that vertebrates adaptively vary the sex ratio of their offspring in response to the mother's physical condition [Trivers, R. L. & Willard, D. (1973) Science 179, 90-92]. This hypothesis has produced considerable debate within evolutionary biology. Here we use meta-analysis techniques to evaluate claims that nonhuman primate females facultatively adjust the sex ratio of their progeny in relation to their own dominance rank in a uniform way. The magnitude of the difference in birth sex ratios of high- and low-ranking females declines as sample sizes increase, and the men difference in birth sex ratios of high- and low-ranking females is zero. These results suggest that the observed effects could be the product of stochastic variation in small samples. These findings indicate that presently we cannot reject the null hypothesis that maternal dominance rank is unrelated to birth sex ratios.",
author = "Brown, {Gillian R.} and Joan Silk",
year = "2002",
month = "8",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1073/pnas.162360599",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "99",
pages = "11252--11255",
journal = "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America",
issn = "0027-8424",
number = "17",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reconsidering the null hypothesis

T2 - Is maternal rank associated with birth sex ratios in primate groups?

AU - Brown, Gillian R.

AU - Silk, Joan

PY - 2002/8/20

Y1 - 2002/8/20

N2 - Trivers and Willard hypothesized that vertebrates adaptively vary the sex ratio of their offspring in response to the mother's physical condition [Trivers, R. L. & Willard, D. (1973) Science 179, 90-92]. This hypothesis has produced considerable debate within evolutionary biology. Here we use meta-analysis techniques to evaluate claims that nonhuman primate females facultatively adjust the sex ratio of their progeny in relation to their own dominance rank in a uniform way. The magnitude of the difference in birth sex ratios of high- and low-ranking females declines as sample sizes increase, and the men difference in birth sex ratios of high- and low-ranking females is zero. These results suggest that the observed effects could be the product of stochastic variation in small samples. These findings indicate that presently we cannot reject the null hypothesis that maternal dominance rank is unrelated to birth sex ratios.

AB - Trivers and Willard hypothesized that vertebrates adaptively vary the sex ratio of their offspring in response to the mother's physical condition [Trivers, R. L. & Willard, D. (1973) Science 179, 90-92]. This hypothesis has produced considerable debate within evolutionary biology. Here we use meta-analysis techniques to evaluate claims that nonhuman primate females facultatively adjust the sex ratio of their progeny in relation to their own dominance rank in a uniform way. The magnitude of the difference in birth sex ratios of high- and low-ranking females declines as sample sizes increase, and the men difference in birth sex ratios of high- and low-ranking females is zero. These results suggest that the observed effects could be the product of stochastic variation in small samples. These findings indicate that presently we cannot reject the null hypothesis that maternal dominance rank is unrelated to birth sex ratios.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037143715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037143715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1073/pnas.162360599

DO - 10.1073/pnas.162360599

M3 - Article

C2 - 12177424

AN - SCOPUS:0037143715

VL - 99

SP - 11252

EP - 11255

JO - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

JF - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

SN - 0027-8424

IS - 17

ER -