Reconsidering assessment in online/hybrid courses: Knowing versus learning

An Chih Cheng, Michelle Jordan, Diane L. Schallert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study explores the influence of assessment on students' online written discussions. A two-by-two design was used to understand students' expression of knowledge and of learning in the contexts of "regular" online discussions versus "final test" online discussions. Findings suggested that assessment had an impact on how students interacted online and in their use of rhetorical moves; and that knowing and learning are related but distinct constructs, correlated within each writing context, dissociated across contexts, and performing differentially as a function of students' perceptions of academic demands. We discuss the limitations of traditional assessment, offer an alternative approach, and conclude with practical suggestions for online/hybrid course instructors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)51-59
Number of pages9
JournalComputers and Education
Volume68
DOIs
StatePublished - May 27 2013

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • Asynchronous written discussion
  • Discourse analysis
  • Online course
  • Social learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science(all)
  • Education

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reconsidering assessment in online/hybrid courses: Knowing versus learning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this