Reconceptualizing goal setting's dark side: The ethical consequences of learning versus outcome goals

David Welsh, John Bush, Chase Thiel, Julena Bonner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Goal-setting theory is one of the most researched and practically applied theories in the field of organizational behavior. A core tenet of this theory is that specific and challenging goals increase performance. However, recent behavioral ethics research has left unresolved questions regarding how high performance goals can be used to motivate performance without also encouraging unethical behavior. Drawing on achievement goal theory, we consider the role of goal type in arguing that an over-use of outcome goals as performance drivers and an over-reliance on goal difficulty as a motivating mechanism have both created goal-setting's dark side and obscured potential remedies. Extending previous research, we integrate the goal-setting literature with regulatory focus theory to demonstrate that outcome goals stimulate a prevention focus, which increases unethical behavior as individuals engage in questionable conduct in order to prevent goal failure. This indirect effect is exacerbated as goal difficulty increases. In contrast to outcome goals, learning goals reduce prevention focus and unethical behavior without decreasing performance—even when goals are difficult. Across both field and laboratory studies, we find convergent support for our proposed model. Our findings extend existing theory and also offer practical insight into harnessing the motivating power of goals without simultaneously increasing unethicality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)14-27
Number of pages14
JournalOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Volume150
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Learning
Goal setting
Unethical behavior
Behavioral Research
Ethics

Keywords

  • Behavioral ethics
  • Goal type
  • Goal-setting
  • Learning goals
  • Regulatory focus
  • Unethical behavior

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Cite this

Reconceptualizing goal setting's dark side : The ethical consequences of learning versus outcome goals. / Welsh, David; Bush, John; Thiel, Chase; Bonner, Julena.

In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 150, 01.01.2019, p. 14-27.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{38272b7ea9b54c0f8feec56c7a6e92d6,
title = "Reconceptualizing goal setting's dark side: The ethical consequences of learning versus outcome goals",
abstract = "Goal-setting theory is one of the most researched and practically applied theories in the field of organizational behavior. A core tenet of this theory is that specific and challenging goals increase performance. However, recent behavioral ethics research has left unresolved questions regarding how high performance goals can be used to motivate performance without also encouraging unethical behavior. Drawing on achievement goal theory, we consider the role of goal type in arguing that an over-use of outcome goals as performance drivers and an over-reliance on goal difficulty as a motivating mechanism have both created goal-setting's dark side and obscured potential remedies. Extending previous research, we integrate the goal-setting literature with regulatory focus theory to demonstrate that outcome goals stimulate a prevention focus, which increases unethical behavior as individuals engage in questionable conduct in order to prevent goal failure. This indirect effect is exacerbated as goal difficulty increases. In contrast to outcome goals, learning goals reduce prevention focus and unethical behavior without decreasing performance—even when goals are difficult. Across both field and laboratory studies, we find convergent support for our proposed model. Our findings extend existing theory and also offer practical insight into harnessing the motivating power of goals without simultaneously increasing unethicality.",
keywords = "Behavioral ethics, Goal type, Goal-setting, Learning goals, Regulatory focus, Unethical behavior",
author = "David Welsh and John Bush and Chase Thiel and Julena Bonner",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.11.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "150",
pages = "14--27",
journal = "Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes",
issn = "0749-5978",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reconceptualizing goal setting's dark side

T2 - The ethical consequences of learning versus outcome goals

AU - Welsh, David

AU - Bush, John

AU - Thiel, Chase

AU - Bonner, Julena

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Goal-setting theory is one of the most researched and practically applied theories in the field of organizational behavior. A core tenet of this theory is that specific and challenging goals increase performance. However, recent behavioral ethics research has left unresolved questions regarding how high performance goals can be used to motivate performance without also encouraging unethical behavior. Drawing on achievement goal theory, we consider the role of goal type in arguing that an over-use of outcome goals as performance drivers and an over-reliance on goal difficulty as a motivating mechanism have both created goal-setting's dark side and obscured potential remedies. Extending previous research, we integrate the goal-setting literature with regulatory focus theory to demonstrate that outcome goals stimulate a prevention focus, which increases unethical behavior as individuals engage in questionable conduct in order to prevent goal failure. This indirect effect is exacerbated as goal difficulty increases. In contrast to outcome goals, learning goals reduce prevention focus and unethical behavior without decreasing performance—even when goals are difficult. Across both field and laboratory studies, we find convergent support for our proposed model. Our findings extend existing theory and also offer practical insight into harnessing the motivating power of goals without simultaneously increasing unethicality.

AB - Goal-setting theory is one of the most researched and practically applied theories in the field of organizational behavior. A core tenet of this theory is that specific and challenging goals increase performance. However, recent behavioral ethics research has left unresolved questions regarding how high performance goals can be used to motivate performance without also encouraging unethical behavior. Drawing on achievement goal theory, we consider the role of goal type in arguing that an over-use of outcome goals as performance drivers and an over-reliance on goal difficulty as a motivating mechanism have both created goal-setting's dark side and obscured potential remedies. Extending previous research, we integrate the goal-setting literature with regulatory focus theory to demonstrate that outcome goals stimulate a prevention focus, which increases unethical behavior as individuals engage in questionable conduct in order to prevent goal failure. This indirect effect is exacerbated as goal difficulty increases. In contrast to outcome goals, learning goals reduce prevention focus and unethical behavior without decreasing performance—even when goals are difficult. Across both field and laboratory studies, we find convergent support for our proposed model. Our findings extend existing theory and also offer practical insight into harnessing the motivating power of goals without simultaneously increasing unethicality.

KW - Behavioral ethics

KW - Goal type

KW - Goal-setting

KW - Learning goals

KW - Regulatory focus

KW - Unethical behavior

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056787168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056787168&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.11.001

DO - 10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.11.001

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85056787168

VL - 150

SP - 14

EP - 27

JO - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

JF - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

SN - 0749-5978

ER -