Recognition of Facial Prototypes: The Importance of Categorical Structure and Degree of Learning

Donald Homa, Carson Smith, Claudette Macak, Jennifer Johovich, Doris Osorio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The importance of categorical structure in the recognition and classification of realistic face prototypes, following a variable number of learning trials, was investigated in four experiments. Subjects either classified or observed well-defined (Experiments 1-3) or ill-defined (Experiment 4) faces belonging to three categories for one or nine trial blocks, followed by a transfer test. Recognition performance following classification (Experiment 1) and observational (Experiments 2 and 3) training was virtually the same: Oldness judgments were highest for the category prototypes and old instances and were least for new and random instances, with these tendencies increased following nine learning trials. When features were made ill defined (Experiment 4), oldness judgments decreased for the category prototype following nine learning trials. Multidimensional scaling (Experiment 5) revealed that the category structure for the well-defined and ill-defined faces was globally similar, and therefore, the disparate recognition of the category prototype was not due to a radical reorganization of the stimulus space. These results suggest that false recognition of the category prototype is at least partially based on type of category structure, and that prior studies using false recognition of the category prototype as evidence of an earlier abstraction process are probably misguided. Rather, false recognition is more likely due to erroneous combinations of features, with category influences playing less of a role.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)443-474
Number of pages32
JournalJournal of Memory and Language
Volume44
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2001

Fingerprint

Learning
learning
experiment
Recognition (Psychology)
Categorical
Prototype
Experiment
multidimensional scaling
abstraction
reorganization
stimulus
False Recognition
performance
evidence
Category Structure

Keywords

  • Category
  • Classification
  • Concept
  • Ill-defined
  • Learning
  • Prototype
  • Recognition
  • Well-defined

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language

Cite this

Recognition of Facial Prototypes : The Importance of Categorical Structure and Degree of Learning. / Homa, Donald; Smith, Carson; Macak, Claudette; Johovich, Jennifer; Osorio, Doris.

In: Journal of Memory and Language, Vol. 44, No. 3, 04.2001, p. 443-474.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Homa, Donald ; Smith, Carson ; Macak, Claudette ; Johovich, Jennifer ; Osorio, Doris. / Recognition of Facial Prototypes : The Importance of Categorical Structure and Degree of Learning. In: Journal of Memory and Language. 2001 ; Vol. 44, No. 3. pp. 443-474.
@article{e1d7fadb886d4b21b7ccae5cb2b27eec,
title = "Recognition of Facial Prototypes: The Importance of Categorical Structure and Degree of Learning",
abstract = "The importance of categorical structure in the recognition and classification of realistic face prototypes, following a variable number of learning trials, was investigated in four experiments. Subjects either classified or observed well-defined (Experiments 1-3) or ill-defined (Experiment 4) faces belonging to three categories for one or nine trial blocks, followed by a transfer test. Recognition performance following classification (Experiment 1) and observational (Experiments 2 and 3) training was virtually the same: Oldness judgments were highest for the category prototypes and old instances and were least for new and random instances, with these tendencies increased following nine learning trials. When features were made ill defined (Experiment 4), oldness judgments decreased for the category prototype following nine learning trials. Multidimensional scaling (Experiment 5) revealed that the category structure for the well-defined and ill-defined faces was globally similar, and therefore, the disparate recognition of the category prototype was not due to a radical reorganization of the stimulus space. These results suggest that false recognition of the category prototype is at least partially based on type of category structure, and that prior studies using false recognition of the category prototype as evidence of an earlier abstraction process are probably misguided. Rather, false recognition is more likely due to erroneous combinations of features, with category influences playing less of a role.",
keywords = "Category, Classification, Concept, Ill-defined, Learning, Prototype, Recognition, Well-defined",
author = "Donald Homa and Carson Smith and Claudette Macak and Jennifer Johovich and Doris Osorio",
year = "2001",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1006/jmla.2000.2723",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
pages = "443--474",
journal = "Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia",
issn = "1888-4415",
publisher = "Ediciones Doyma, S.L.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recognition of Facial Prototypes

T2 - The Importance of Categorical Structure and Degree of Learning

AU - Homa, Donald

AU - Smith, Carson

AU - Macak, Claudette

AU - Johovich, Jennifer

AU - Osorio, Doris

PY - 2001/4

Y1 - 2001/4

N2 - The importance of categorical structure in the recognition and classification of realistic face prototypes, following a variable number of learning trials, was investigated in four experiments. Subjects either classified or observed well-defined (Experiments 1-3) or ill-defined (Experiment 4) faces belonging to three categories for one or nine trial blocks, followed by a transfer test. Recognition performance following classification (Experiment 1) and observational (Experiments 2 and 3) training was virtually the same: Oldness judgments were highest for the category prototypes and old instances and were least for new and random instances, with these tendencies increased following nine learning trials. When features were made ill defined (Experiment 4), oldness judgments decreased for the category prototype following nine learning trials. Multidimensional scaling (Experiment 5) revealed that the category structure for the well-defined and ill-defined faces was globally similar, and therefore, the disparate recognition of the category prototype was not due to a radical reorganization of the stimulus space. These results suggest that false recognition of the category prototype is at least partially based on type of category structure, and that prior studies using false recognition of the category prototype as evidence of an earlier abstraction process are probably misguided. Rather, false recognition is more likely due to erroneous combinations of features, with category influences playing less of a role.

AB - The importance of categorical structure in the recognition and classification of realistic face prototypes, following a variable number of learning trials, was investigated in four experiments. Subjects either classified or observed well-defined (Experiments 1-3) or ill-defined (Experiment 4) faces belonging to three categories for one or nine trial blocks, followed by a transfer test. Recognition performance following classification (Experiment 1) and observational (Experiments 2 and 3) training was virtually the same: Oldness judgments were highest for the category prototypes and old instances and were least for new and random instances, with these tendencies increased following nine learning trials. When features were made ill defined (Experiment 4), oldness judgments decreased for the category prototype following nine learning trials. Multidimensional scaling (Experiment 5) revealed that the category structure for the well-defined and ill-defined faces was globally similar, and therefore, the disparate recognition of the category prototype was not due to a radical reorganization of the stimulus space. These results suggest that false recognition of the category prototype is at least partially based on type of category structure, and that prior studies using false recognition of the category prototype as evidence of an earlier abstraction process are probably misguided. Rather, false recognition is more likely due to erroneous combinations of features, with category influences playing less of a role.

KW - Category

KW - Classification

KW - Concept

KW - Ill-defined

KW - Learning

KW - Prototype

KW - Recognition

KW - Well-defined

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035743272&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035743272&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/jmla.2000.2723

DO - 10.1006/jmla.2000.2723

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0035743272

VL - 44

SP - 443

EP - 474

JO - Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia

JF - Revista Espanola de Cirugia Ortopedica y Traumatologia

SN - 1888-4415

IS - 3

ER -