Reciprocal learning and chronic care model implementation in primary care: Results from a new scale of learning in primary care

Luci K. Leykum, Ray Palmer, Holly Lanham, Michelle Jordan, Reuben R. McDaniel, Polly H. Nol, Michael Parchman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Efforts to improve the care of patients with chronic disease in primary care settings have been mixed. Application of a complex adaptive systems framework suggests that this may be because implementation efforts often focus on education or decision support of individual providers, and not on the dynamic system as a whole. We believe that learning among clinic group members is a particularly important attribute of a primary care clinic that has not yet been well-studied in the health care literature, but may be related to the ability of primary care practices to improve the care they deliver. To better understand learning in primary care settings by developing a scale of learning in primary care clinics based on the literature related to learning across disciplines, and to examine the association between scale responses and chronic care model implementation as measured by the Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC) scale. Methods. Development of a scale of learning in primary care setting and administration of the learning and ACIC scales to primary care clinic members as part of the baseline assessment in the ABC Intervention Study. All clinic clinicians and staff in forty small primary care clinics in South Texas participated in the survey. Results: We developed a twenty-two item learning scale, and identified a five-item subscale measuring the construct of reciprocal learning (Cronbach alpha 0.79). Reciprocal learning was significantly associated with ACIC total and sub-scale scores, even after adjustment for clustering effects. Conclusions: Reciprocal learning appears to be an important attribute of learning in primary care clinics, and its presence relates to the degree of chronic care model implementation. Interventions to improve reciprocal learning among clinic members may lead to improved care of patients with chronic disease and may be relevant to improving overall clinic performance.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number44
JournalBMC Health Services Research
Volume11
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
Learning
Chronic Disease
Patient Care
Aptitude
Cluster Analysis
Delivery of Health Care
Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Reciprocal learning and chronic care model implementation in primary care : Results from a new scale of learning in primary care. / Leykum, Luci K.; Palmer, Ray; Lanham, Holly; Jordan, Michelle; McDaniel, Reuben R.; Nol, Polly H.; Parchman, Michael.

In: BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 11, 44, 2011.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Leykum, Luci K. ; Palmer, Ray ; Lanham, Holly ; Jordan, Michelle ; McDaniel, Reuben R. ; Nol, Polly H. ; Parchman, Michael. / Reciprocal learning and chronic care model implementation in primary care : Results from a new scale of learning in primary care. In: BMC Health Services Research. 2011 ; Vol. 11.
@article{8e2b9a4e3db14836bf2e6ae51a87c645,
title = "Reciprocal learning and chronic care model implementation in primary care: Results from a new scale of learning in primary care",
abstract = "Background: Efforts to improve the care of patients with chronic disease in primary care settings have been mixed. Application of a complex adaptive systems framework suggests that this may be because implementation efforts often focus on education or decision support of individual providers, and not on the dynamic system as a whole. We believe that learning among clinic group members is a particularly important attribute of a primary care clinic that has not yet been well-studied in the health care literature, but may be related to the ability of primary care practices to improve the care they deliver. To better understand learning in primary care settings by developing a scale of learning in primary care clinics based on the literature related to learning across disciplines, and to examine the association between scale responses and chronic care model implementation as measured by the Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC) scale. Methods. Development of a scale of learning in primary care setting and administration of the learning and ACIC scales to primary care clinic members as part of the baseline assessment in the ABC Intervention Study. All clinic clinicians and staff in forty small primary care clinics in South Texas participated in the survey. Results: We developed a twenty-two item learning scale, and identified a five-item subscale measuring the construct of reciprocal learning (Cronbach alpha 0.79). Reciprocal learning was significantly associated with ACIC total and sub-scale scores, even after adjustment for clustering effects. Conclusions: Reciprocal learning appears to be an important attribute of learning in primary care clinics, and its presence relates to the degree of chronic care model implementation. Interventions to improve reciprocal learning among clinic members may lead to improved care of patients with chronic disease and may be relevant to improving overall clinic performance.",
author = "Leykum, {Luci K.} and Ray Palmer and Holly Lanham and Michelle Jordan and McDaniel, {Reuben R.} and Nol, {Polly H.} and Michael Parchman",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1186/1472-6963-11-44",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
journal = "BMC Health Services Research",
issn = "1472-6963",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reciprocal learning and chronic care model implementation in primary care

T2 - Results from a new scale of learning in primary care

AU - Leykum, Luci K.

AU - Palmer, Ray

AU - Lanham, Holly

AU - Jordan, Michelle

AU - McDaniel, Reuben R.

AU - Nol, Polly H.

AU - Parchman, Michael

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Background: Efforts to improve the care of patients with chronic disease in primary care settings have been mixed. Application of a complex adaptive systems framework suggests that this may be because implementation efforts often focus on education or decision support of individual providers, and not on the dynamic system as a whole. We believe that learning among clinic group members is a particularly important attribute of a primary care clinic that has not yet been well-studied in the health care literature, but may be related to the ability of primary care practices to improve the care they deliver. To better understand learning in primary care settings by developing a scale of learning in primary care clinics based on the literature related to learning across disciplines, and to examine the association between scale responses and chronic care model implementation as measured by the Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC) scale. Methods. Development of a scale of learning in primary care setting and administration of the learning and ACIC scales to primary care clinic members as part of the baseline assessment in the ABC Intervention Study. All clinic clinicians and staff in forty small primary care clinics in South Texas participated in the survey. Results: We developed a twenty-two item learning scale, and identified a five-item subscale measuring the construct of reciprocal learning (Cronbach alpha 0.79). Reciprocal learning was significantly associated with ACIC total and sub-scale scores, even after adjustment for clustering effects. Conclusions: Reciprocal learning appears to be an important attribute of learning in primary care clinics, and its presence relates to the degree of chronic care model implementation. Interventions to improve reciprocal learning among clinic members may lead to improved care of patients with chronic disease and may be relevant to improving overall clinic performance.

AB - Background: Efforts to improve the care of patients with chronic disease in primary care settings have been mixed. Application of a complex adaptive systems framework suggests that this may be because implementation efforts often focus on education or decision support of individual providers, and not on the dynamic system as a whole. We believe that learning among clinic group members is a particularly important attribute of a primary care clinic that has not yet been well-studied in the health care literature, but may be related to the ability of primary care practices to improve the care they deliver. To better understand learning in primary care settings by developing a scale of learning in primary care clinics based on the literature related to learning across disciplines, and to examine the association between scale responses and chronic care model implementation as measured by the Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC) scale. Methods. Development of a scale of learning in primary care setting and administration of the learning and ACIC scales to primary care clinic members as part of the baseline assessment in the ABC Intervention Study. All clinic clinicians and staff in forty small primary care clinics in South Texas participated in the survey. Results: We developed a twenty-two item learning scale, and identified a five-item subscale measuring the construct of reciprocal learning (Cronbach alpha 0.79). Reciprocal learning was significantly associated with ACIC total and sub-scale scores, even after adjustment for clustering effects. Conclusions: Reciprocal learning appears to be an important attribute of learning in primary care clinics, and its presence relates to the degree of chronic care model implementation. Interventions to improve reciprocal learning among clinic members may lead to improved care of patients with chronic disease and may be relevant to improving overall clinic performance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79951854442&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79951854442&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/1472-6963-11-44

DO - 10.1186/1472-6963-11-44

M3 - Article

C2 - 21345225

AN - SCOPUS:79951854442

VL - 11

JO - BMC Health Services Research

JF - BMC Health Services Research

SN - 1472-6963

M1 - 44

ER -