Reasoning About Cultural and Genetic Transmission: Developmental and Cross-Cultural Evidence From Peru, Fiji, and the United States on How People Make Inferences About Trait Transmission

Cristina Moya, Robert Boyd, Joseph Henrich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Using samples from three diverse populations, we test evolutionary hypotheses regarding how people reason about the inheritance of various traits. First, we provide a framework for differentiat-ing the outputs of mechanisms that evolved for reasoning about variation within and between (a) biological taxa and (b) culturally evolved ethnic categories from (c) a broader set of beliefs and categories that are the outputs of structured learning mechanisms. Second, we describe the results of a modified "switched-at-birth" vignette study that we administered among children and adults in Puno (Peru), Yasawa (Fiji), and adults in the United States. This protocol permits us to study perceptions of prenatal and social transmission pathways for various traits and to differentiate the latter into vertical (i.e., parental) versus horizontal (i.e., peer) cultural influence. These lines of evidence suggest that people use all three mechanisms to reason about the distribution of traits in the population. Participants at all three sites develop expectations that morphological traits are under prenatal influence, and that belief traits are more culturally influenced. On the other hand, each population holds culturally specific beliefs about the degree of social influence on non-morphological traits and about the degree of vertical transmission-with only participants in the United States expecting parents to have much social influence over their children. We reinterpret people's differentiation of trait transmission pathways in light of humans' evolutionary history as a cultural species. Copyright

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)595-610
Number of pages16
JournalTopics in Cognitive Science
Volume7
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2015

Fingerprint

Fiji
Peru
Melanesia
Population
Social Perception
evidence
parents
Parents
History
Learning
Parturition
history
learning

Keywords

  • Adoption paradigm
  • Cognitive development
  • Cross-cultural psychology
  • Dual inheritance theory
  • Folkbiology
  • Folksociology
  • Social learning
  • Vertical transmission

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

@article{6d19837ce2004dbc85e572e2621da45d,
title = "Reasoning About Cultural and Genetic Transmission: Developmental and Cross-Cultural Evidence From Peru, Fiji, and the United States on How People Make Inferences About Trait Transmission",
abstract = "Using samples from three diverse populations, we test evolutionary hypotheses regarding how people reason about the inheritance of various traits. First, we provide a framework for differentiat-ing the outputs of mechanisms that evolved for reasoning about variation within and between (a) biological taxa and (b) culturally evolved ethnic categories from (c) a broader set of beliefs and categories that are the outputs of structured learning mechanisms. Second, we describe the results of a modified {"}switched-at-birth{"} vignette study that we administered among children and adults in Puno (Peru), Yasawa (Fiji), and adults in the United States. This protocol permits us to study perceptions of prenatal and social transmission pathways for various traits and to differentiate the latter into vertical (i.e., parental) versus horizontal (i.e., peer) cultural influence. These lines of evidence suggest that people use all three mechanisms to reason about the distribution of traits in the population. Participants at all three sites develop expectations that morphological traits are under prenatal influence, and that belief traits are more culturally influenced. On the other hand, each population holds culturally specific beliefs about the degree of social influence on non-morphological traits and about the degree of vertical transmission-with only participants in the United States expecting parents to have much social influence over their children. We reinterpret people's differentiation of trait transmission pathways in light of humans' evolutionary history as a cultural species. Copyright",
keywords = "Adoption paradigm, Cognitive development, Cross-cultural psychology, Dual inheritance theory, Folkbiology, Folksociology, Social learning, Vertical transmission",
author = "Cristina Moya and Robert Boyd and Joseph Henrich",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/tops.12163",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
pages = "595--610",
journal = "Topics in Cognitive Science",
issn = "1756-8757",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reasoning About Cultural and Genetic Transmission

T2 - Developmental and Cross-Cultural Evidence From Peru, Fiji, and the United States on How People Make Inferences About Trait Transmission

AU - Moya, Cristina

AU - Boyd, Robert

AU - Henrich, Joseph

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - Using samples from three diverse populations, we test evolutionary hypotheses regarding how people reason about the inheritance of various traits. First, we provide a framework for differentiat-ing the outputs of mechanisms that evolved for reasoning about variation within and between (a) biological taxa and (b) culturally evolved ethnic categories from (c) a broader set of beliefs and categories that are the outputs of structured learning mechanisms. Second, we describe the results of a modified "switched-at-birth" vignette study that we administered among children and adults in Puno (Peru), Yasawa (Fiji), and adults in the United States. This protocol permits us to study perceptions of prenatal and social transmission pathways for various traits and to differentiate the latter into vertical (i.e., parental) versus horizontal (i.e., peer) cultural influence. These lines of evidence suggest that people use all three mechanisms to reason about the distribution of traits in the population. Participants at all three sites develop expectations that morphological traits are under prenatal influence, and that belief traits are more culturally influenced. On the other hand, each population holds culturally specific beliefs about the degree of social influence on non-morphological traits and about the degree of vertical transmission-with only participants in the United States expecting parents to have much social influence over their children. We reinterpret people's differentiation of trait transmission pathways in light of humans' evolutionary history as a cultural species. Copyright

AB - Using samples from three diverse populations, we test evolutionary hypotheses regarding how people reason about the inheritance of various traits. First, we provide a framework for differentiat-ing the outputs of mechanisms that evolved for reasoning about variation within and between (a) biological taxa and (b) culturally evolved ethnic categories from (c) a broader set of beliefs and categories that are the outputs of structured learning mechanisms. Second, we describe the results of a modified "switched-at-birth" vignette study that we administered among children and adults in Puno (Peru), Yasawa (Fiji), and adults in the United States. This protocol permits us to study perceptions of prenatal and social transmission pathways for various traits and to differentiate the latter into vertical (i.e., parental) versus horizontal (i.e., peer) cultural influence. These lines of evidence suggest that people use all three mechanisms to reason about the distribution of traits in the population. Participants at all three sites develop expectations that morphological traits are under prenatal influence, and that belief traits are more culturally influenced. On the other hand, each population holds culturally specific beliefs about the degree of social influence on non-morphological traits and about the degree of vertical transmission-with only participants in the United States expecting parents to have much social influence over their children. We reinterpret people's differentiation of trait transmission pathways in light of humans' evolutionary history as a cultural species. Copyright

KW - Adoption paradigm

KW - Cognitive development

KW - Cross-cultural psychology

KW - Dual inheritance theory

KW - Folkbiology

KW - Folksociology

KW - Social learning

KW - Vertical transmission

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944681865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84944681865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/tops.12163

DO - 10.1111/tops.12163

M3 - Article

C2 - 26417672

AN - SCOPUS:84944681865

VL - 7

SP - 595

EP - 610

JO - Topics in Cognitive Science

JF - Topics in Cognitive Science

SN - 1756-8757

IS - 4

ER -