Realism and relevance in the economics of a free society

The Knight-Hutchison debate

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The methodological debate between Frank Knight and Terence Hutchison is usually framed in terms of the philosophical debates between positivism and intuitionism, or between empirical knowledge and theoretical knowledge. Hutchison's argument was, after all, a defense of the need for empirically-based economic knowledge, using the justificatory framework provided by logical positivism, and Knight was widely known for his defense of the understanding of economic theory often associated with Lionel Robbins. But the dispute between Knight and Hutchison was much more than a battle over the epistemological status of economics' basic postulates. For Knight, Hutchison's positivism posed risks for the discussion at the heart of liberal democracy. Hutchison, also, aimed his methodological criticism of economic theory at a similar target: the economic objectives of all societies would be achieved sooner if planners were guided by an empirical economic science.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)341-350
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Economic Methodology
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Realism
Economics
Positivism
Economic theory
Dispute
Logic
Democracy
Criticism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Realism and relevance in the economics of a free society : The Knight-Hutchison debate. / Emmett, Ross.

In: Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 16, No. 3, 01.12.2009, p. 341-350.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{72f08f68922444639a8e35c3703c0a47,
title = "Realism and relevance in the economics of a free society: The Knight-Hutchison debate",
abstract = "The methodological debate between Frank Knight and Terence Hutchison is usually framed in terms of the philosophical debates between positivism and intuitionism, or between empirical knowledge and theoretical knowledge. Hutchison's argument was, after all, a defense of the need for empirically-based economic knowledge, using the justificatory framework provided by logical positivism, and Knight was widely known for his defense of the understanding of economic theory often associated with Lionel Robbins. But the dispute between Knight and Hutchison was much more than a battle over the epistemological status of economics' basic postulates. For Knight, Hutchison's positivism posed risks for the discussion at the heart of liberal democracy. Hutchison, also, aimed his methodological criticism of economic theory at a similar target: the economic objectives of all societies would be achieved sooner if planners were guided by an empirical economic science.",
author = "Ross Emmett",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/13501780903129322",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "341--350",
journal = "Journal of Economic Methodology",
issn = "1350-178X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Realism and relevance in the economics of a free society

T2 - The Knight-Hutchison debate

AU - Emmett, Ross

PY - 2009/12/1

Y1 - 2009/12/1

N2 - The methodological debate between Frank Knight and Terence Hutchison is usually framed in terms of the philosophical debates between positivism and intuitionism, or between empirical knowledge and theoretical knowledge. Hutchison's argument was, after all, a defense of the need for empirically-based economic knowledge, using the justificatory framework provided by logical positivism, and Knight was widely known for his defense of the understanding of economic theory often associated with Lionel Robbins. But the dispute between Knight and Hutchison was much more than a battle over the epistemological status of economics' basic postulates. For Knight, Hutchison's positivism posed risks for the discussion at the heart of liberal democracy. Hutchison, also, aimed his methodological criticism of economic theory at a similar target: the economic objectives of all societies would be achieved sooner if planners were guided by an empirical economic science.

AB - The methodological debate between Frank Knight and Terence Hutchison is usually framed in terms of the philosophical debates between positivism and intuitionism, or between empirical knowledge and theoretical knowledge. Hutchison's argument was, after all, a defense of the need for empirically-based economic knowledge, using the justificatory framework provided by logical positivism, and Knight was widely known for his defense of the understanding of economic theory often associated with Lionel Robbins. But the dispute between Knight and Hutchison was much more than a battle over the epistemological status of economics' basic postulates. For Knight, Hutchison's positivism posed risks for the discussion at the heart of liberal democracy. Hutchison, also, aimed his methodological criticism of economic theory at a similar target: the economic objectives of all societies would be achieved sooner if planners were guided by an empirical economic science.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650106758&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650106758&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13501780903129322

DO - 10.1080/13501780903129322

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 341

EP - 350

JO - Journal of Economic Methodology

JF - Journal of Economic Methodology

SN - 1350-178X

IS - 3

ER -