Abstract
Participatory Budgeting (PB) is currently practiced in more than a dozen of American cities. It is indicated by the White House as best practice in civic engagement and by scholars as a new wave of democratic innovation. With the enthusiastic spread of PB in the US, it is imperative to continuously integrate reflective learning to sustain and enhance its impact. In this paper, I share learning drawn form the practice of PB at the Toronto Community Housing (TCH), highlighting a host of communicative and procedural challenges, hindering the growth of collaborative partnerships among the management, staff and the tenants. I demonstrate that the stakeholders have developed differing perspectives and multiple experiences with regard to tenant participation, and in consequence, participation has been molded into a rather confusing format. The weakest link, I argue, has been a lack of deliberation on a participatory vision: what it is that PB and tenant participation must achieve.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Article number | 11 |
Journal | Journal of Public Deliberation |
Volume | 13 |
Issue number | 2 |
State | Published - Jan 1 2017 |
Keywords
- Deliberative democracy
- Participatory budgeting
- Participatory governance
- Public housing management
- Tenant participation
- Toronto community housing
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Sociology and Political Science