TY - JOUR
T1 - ReaderBench
T2 - Automated evaluation of collaboration based on cohesion and dialogism
AU - Dascalu, Mihai
AU - Trausan-Matu, Stefan
AU - McNamara, Danielle
AU - Dessus, Philippe
N1 - Funding Information:
We would like to thank the students of University “Politehnica” of Bucharest who participated in our experiments. This research was partially supported by the FP7 2008–212578 LTfLL project, by the EC H2020 project RAGE (Realising and Applied Gaming Eco-System) http://www.rageproject.eu/ Grant agreement No 644187, by the Sectorial Operational Programme Human Resources Development 2007–2013 of the Ministry of European Funds through the Financial Agreement POSDRU/159/1.5/S/134398, by the senior Fulbright scholarship program, as well as by the NSF grants 1417997 and 1418378 to Arizona State University. Moreover, we would like to thank Laura Allen for her support in conducting the statistical analyses, and we are grateful to Cecile Perret for her help in preparing this paper.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, International Society of the Learning Sciences, Inc.
PY - 2015/12/1
Y1 - 2015/12/1
N2 - As Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) gains a broader usage, the need for automated tools capable of supporting tutors in the time-consuming process of analyzing conversations becomes more pressing. Moreover, collaboration, which presumes the intertwining of ideas or points of view among participants, is a central element of dialogue performed in CSCL environments. Therefore, starting from dialogism and a cohesion-based model of discourse, we propose and validate two computational models for assessing collaboration. The first model is based on a cohesion graph and can be perceived as a longitudinal analysis of the ongoing conversation, thus accounting for collaboration from a social knowledge-building perspective. In the second approach, collaboration is regarded from a dialogical perspective as the intertwining or synergy of voices pertaining to different speakers, therefore enabling a transversal analysis of subsequent discussion slices.
AB - As Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) gains a broader usage, the need for automated tools capable of supporting tutors in the time-consuming process of analyzing conversations becomes more pressing. Moreover, collaboration, which presumes the intertwining of ideas or points of view among participants, is a central element of dialogue performed in CSCL environments. Therefore, starting from dialogism and a cohesion-based model of discourse, we propose and validate two computational models for assessing collaboration. The first model is based on a cohesion graph and can be perceived as a longitudinal analysis of the ongoing conversation, thus accounting for collaboration from a social knowledge-building perspective. In the second approach, collaboration is regarded from a dialogical perspective as the intertwining or synergy of voices pertaining to different speakers, therefore enabling a transversal analysis of subsequent discussion slices.
KW - Automated feedback
KW - Cohesion-based discourse analysis
KW - Collaboration assessment
KW - Computer supported collaborative learning
KW - Dialogism
KW - Learning analytics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948760316&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84948760316&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11412-015-9226-y
DO - 10.1007/s11412-015-9226-y
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84948760316
SN - 1556-1607
VL - 10
SP - 395
EP - 423
JO - International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
JF - International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning
IS - 4
ER -