Reaching agreement: The structure & pragmatics of critical care nurses' informal argument

Debra A. Hagler, Sarah K. Brem

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The hospital critical care unit provides an authentic, high-stakes setting for studying reasoning, argumentation, and discourse. In particular, it allows examination of structural and pragmatic features of informal collaborative argument created while participants are engaged in familiar, meaningful activities central to their work. The nursing change of shift report is a workplace ritual which includes communication of extensively detailed patient data and nursing decisions as well as the justifications for those decisions. Nurse pairs (N = 20 pairs) from three hospitals and four critical care units were observed and recorded during authentic change of shift reports, then interviewed or surveyed about the reporting process. The nurses in this study showed a number of argumentative strengths including frequent use of evidence to back claims and the construction of a complex and nuanced process for achieving agreement about the patient situation. Nursing variations from traditional structural argument models, including emphasis on first-hand information and efforts to reach agreement, are effective pragmatic strategies for justifying claims related to patient care in a dynamic, time-pressured environment. The study of nursing workplace discourse has implications for progress in argumentation and educational psychology as well as nursing education and health care delivery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)403-424
Number of pages22
JournalContemporary Educational Psychology
Volume33
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2008

Fingerprint

Critical Care
pragmatics
Nursing
nursing
nurse
Nurses
Workplace
argumentation
Educational Psychology
Ceremonial Behavior
workplace
Nursing Education
Structural Models
Nursing Care
educational psychology
discourse
Patient Care
structural model
patient care
Communication

Keywords

  • Argumentation
  • Critical care
  • Discourse
  • Nursing
  • Workplace

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Education

Cite this

Reaching agreement : The structure & pragmatics of critical care nurses' informal argument. / Hagler, Debra A.; Brem, Sarah K.

In: Contemporary Educational Psychology, Vol. 33, No. 3, 07.2008, p. 403-424.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{aa91b769c5d04256abedd9dd61e4158f,
title = "Reaching agreement: The structure & pragmatics of critical care nurses' informal argument",
abstract = "The hospital critical care unit provides an authentic, high-stakes setting for studying reasoning, argumentation, and discourse. In particular, it allows examination of structural and pragmatic features of informal collaborative argument created while participants are engaged in familiar, meaningful activities central to their work. The nursing change of shift report is a workplace ritual which includes communication of extensively detailed patient data and nursing decisions as well as the justifications for those decisions. Nurse pairs (N = 20 pairs) from three hospitals and four critical care units were observed and recorded during authentic change of shift reports, then interviewed or surveyed about the reporting process. The nurses in this study showed a number of argumentative strengths including frequent use of evidence to back claims and the construction of a complex and nuanced process for achieving agreement about the patient situation. Nursing variations from traditional structural argument models, including emphasis on first-hand information and efforts to reach agreement, are effective pragmatic strategies for justifying claims related to patient care in a dynamic, time-pressured environment. The study of nursing workplace discourse has implications for progress in argumentation and educational psychology as well as nursing education and health care delivery.",
keywords = "Argumentation, Critical care, Discourse, Nursing, Workplace",
author = "Hagler, {Debra A.} and Brem, {Sarah K.}",
year = "2008",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.05.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "33",
pages = "403--424",
journal = "Contemporary Educational Psychology",
issn = "0361-476X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reaching agreement

T2 - The structure & pragmatics of critical care nurses' informal argument

AU - Hagler, Debra A.

AU - Brem, Sarah K.

PY - 2008/7

Y1 - 2008/7

N2 - The hospital critical care unit provides an authentic, high-stakes setting for studying reasoning, argumentation, and discourse. In particular, it allows examination of structural and pragmatic features of informal collaborative argument created while participants are engaged in familiar, meaningful activities central to their work. The nursing change of shift report is a workplace ritual which includes communication of extensively detailed patient data and nursing decisions as well as the justifications for those decisions. Nurse pairs (N = 20 pairs) from three hospitals and four critical care units were observed and recorded during authentic change of shift reports, then interviewed or surveyed about the reporting process. The nurses in this study showed a number of argumentative strengths including frequent use of evidence to back claims and the construction of a complex and nuanced process for achieving agreement about the patient situation. Nursing variations from traditional structural argument models, including emphasis on first-hand information and efforts to reach agreement, are effective pragmatic strategies for justifying claims related to patient care in a dynamic, time-pressured environment. The study of nursing workplace discourse has implications for progress in argumentation and educational psychology as well as nursing education and health care delivery.

AB - The hospital critical care unit provides an authentic, high-stakes setting for studying reasoning, argumentation, and discourse. In particular, it allows examination of structural and pragmatic features of informal collaborative argument created while participants are engaged in familiar, meaningful activities central to their work. The nursing change of shift report is a workplace ritual which includes communication of extensively detailed patient data and nursing decisions as well as the justifications for those decisions. Nurse pairs (N = 20 pairs) from three hospitals and four critical care units were observed and recorded during authentic change of shift reports, then interviewed or surveyed about the reporting process. The nurses in this study showed a number of argumentative strengths including frequent use of evidence to back claims and the construction of a complex and nuanced process for achieving agreement about the patient situation. Nursing variations from traditional structural argument models, including emphasis on first-hand information and efforts to reach agreement, are effective pragmatic strategies for justifying claims related to patient care in a dynamic, time-pressured environment. The study of nursing workplace discourse has implications for progress in argumentation and educational psychology as well as nursing education and health care delivery.

KW - Argumentation

KW - Critical care

KW - Discourse

KW - Nursing

KW - Workplace

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=48349086077&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=48349086077&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.05.002

DO - 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.05.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:48349086077

VL - 33

SP - 403

EP - 424

JO - Contemporary Educational Psychology

JF - Contemporary Educational Psychology

SN - 0361-476X

IS - 3

ER -