RBC Methodology and the Development of Aggregate Economic Theory

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

This essay reviews the development of neoclassical growth theory, a unified theory of aggregate economic phenomena that was first used to study business cycles and aggregate labor supply. Subsequently, the theory has been used to understand asset pricing, growth miracles and disasters, monetary economics, capital accounts, aggregate public finance, economic development, and foreign direct investment. The focus of this essay is on real business cycle (RBC) methodology. Those who employ the discipline behind the methodology to address various quantitative questions come up with essentially the same answer—evidence that the theory has a life of its own, directing researchers to essentially the same conclusions when they apply its discipline. Deviations from the theory sometimes arise and remain open for a considerable period before they are resolved by better measurement and extensions of the theory. Elements of the discipline include selecting a model economy or sometimes a set of model economies. The model used to address a specific question or issue must have a consistent set of national accounts with all the accounting identities holding. In addition, the model assumptions must be consistent across applications and be consistent with micro as well as aggregate observations. Reality is complex, and any model economy used is necessarily an abstraction and therefore false. This does not mean, however, that model economies are not useful in drawing scientific inference. The vast number of contributions made by many researchers who have used this methodology precludes reviewing them all in this essay. Instead, the contributions reviewed here are ones that illustrate methodological points or extend the applicability of neoclassical growth theory. Of particular interest will be important developments subsequent to the Cooley and Hansen (1995) volume, Frontiers of Business Cycle Research. The interaction between theory and measurement is emphasized because this is the way in which hard quantitative sciences progress.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationHandbook of Macroeconomics, 2016
PublisherElsevier B.V.
Pages1759-1787
Number of pages29
Volume2
ISBN (Print)9780444594877
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Publication series

NameHandbook of Macroeconomics
Volume2
ISSN (Print)15740048

Fingerprint

Real business cycles
Methodology
Economic theory
Neoclassical growth
Business cycles
Growth theory
Public finance
Foreign direct investment
Labor supply
National accounts
Monetary economics
Inference
Reviewing
Deviation
Asset pricing
Interaction
Economics
Disaster
Capital account
Economic capital

Keywords

  • Aggregate economic theory
  • Aggregate financial economics
  • Aggregation
  • Business cycle fluctuations
  • Depressions
  • Development
  • Neoclassical growth theory
  • Prosperities
  • RBC methodology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)

Cite this

Prescott, E. (2016). RBC Methodology and the Development of Aggregate Economic Theory. In Handbook of Macroeconomics, 2016 (Vol. 2, pp. 1759-1787). (Handbook of Macroeconomics; Vol. 2). Elsevier B.V.. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hesmac.2016.03.001

RBC Methodology and the Development of Aggregate Economic Theory. / Prescott, Edward.

Handbook of Macroeconomics, 2016. Vol. 2 Elsevier B.V., 2016. p. 1759-1787 (Handbook of Macroeconomics; Vol. 2).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Prescott, E 2016, RBC Methodology and the Development of Aggregate Economic Theory. in Handbook of Macroeconomics, 2016. vol. 2, Handbook of Macroeconomics, vol. 2, Elsevier B.V., pp. 1759-1787. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hesmac.2016.03.001
Prescott E. RBC Methodology and the Development of Aggregate Economic Theory. In Handbook of Macroeconomics, 2016. Vol. 2. Elsevier B.V. 2016. p. 1759-1787. (Handbook of Macroeconomics). https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hesmac.2016.03.001
Prescott, Edward. / RBC Methodology and the Development of Aggregate Economic Theory. Handbook of Macroeconomics, 2016. Vol. 2 Elsevier B.V., 2016. pp. 1759-1787 (Handbook of Macroeconomics).
@inbook{bd95cf9d7c594527b60c86458eee5f77,
title = "RBC Methodology and the Development of Aggregate Economic Theory",
abstract = "This essay reviews the development of neoclassical growth theory, a unified theory of aggregate economic phenomena that was first used to study business cycles and aggregate labor supply. Subsequently, the theory has been used to understand asset pricing, growth miracles and disasters, monetary economics, capital accounts, aggregate public finance, economic development, and foreign direct investment. The focus of this essay is on real business cycle (RBC) methodology. Those who employ the discipline behind the methodology to address various quantitative questions come up with essentially the same answer—evidence that the theory has a life of its own, directing researchers to essentially the same conclusions when they apply its discipline. Deviations from the theory sometimes arise and remain open for a considerable period before they are resolved by better measurement and extensions of the theory. Elements of the discipline include selecting a model economy or sometimes a set of model economies. The model used to address a specific question or issue must have a consistent set of national accounts with all the accounting identities holding. In addition, the model assumptions must be consistent across applications and be consistent with micro as well as aggregate observations. Reality is complex, and any model economy used is necessarily an abstraction and therefore false. This does not mean, however, that model economies are not useful in drawing scientific inference. The vast number of contributions made by many researchers who have used this methodology precludes reviewing them all in this essay. Instead, the contributions reviewed here are ones that illustrate methodological points or extend the applicability of neoclassical growth theory. Of particular interest will be important developments subsequent to the Cooley and Hansen (1995) volume, Frontiers of Business Cycle Research. The interaction between theory and measurement is emphasized because this is the way in which hard quantitative sciences progress.",
keywords = "Aggregate economic theory, Aggregate financial economics, Aggregation, Business cycle fluctuations, Depressions, Development, Neoclassical growth theory, Prosperities, RBC methodology",
author = "Edward Prescott",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1016/bs.hesmac.2016.03.001",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780444594877",
volume = "2",
series = "Handbook of Macroeconomics",
publisher = "Elsevier B.V.",
pages = "1759--1787",
booktitle = "Handbook of Macroeconomics, 2016",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - RBC Methodology and the Development of Aggregate Economic Theory

AU - Prescott, Edward

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - This essay reviews the development of neoclassical growth theory, a unified theory of aggregate economic phenomena that was first used to study business cycles and aggregate labor supply. Subsequently, the theory has been used to understand asset pricing, growth miracles and disasters, monetary economics, capital accounts, aggregate public finance, economic development, and foreign direct investment. The focus of this essay is on real business cycle (RBC) methodology. Those who employ the discipline behind the methodology to address various quantitative questions come up with essentially the same answer—evidence that the theory has a life of its own, directing researchers to essentially the same conclusions when they apply its discipline. Deviations from the theory sometimes arise and remain open for a considerable period before they are resolved by better measurement and extensions of the theory. Elements of the discipline include selecting a model economy or sometimes a set of model economies. The model used to address a specific question or issue must have a consistent set of national accounts with all the accounting identities holding. In addition, the model assumptions must be consistent across applications and be consistent with micro as well as aggregate observations. Reality is complex, and any model economy used is necessarily an abstraction and therefore false. This does not mean, however, that model economies are not useful in drawing scientific inference. The vast number of contributions made by many researchers who have used this methodology precludes reviewing them all in this essay. Instead, the contributions reviewed here are ones that illustrate methodological points or extend the applicability of neoclassical growth theory. Of particular interest will be important developments subsequent to the Cooley and Hansen (1995) volume, Frontiers of Business Cycle Research. The interaction between theory and measurement is emphasized because this is the way in which hard quantitative sciences progress.

AB - This essay reviews the development of neoclassical growth theory, a unified theory of aggregate economic phenomena that was first used to study business cycles and aggregate labor supply. Subsequently, the theory has been used to understand asset pricing, growth miracles and disasters, monetary economics, capital accounts, aggregate public finance, economic development, and foreign direct investment. The focus of this essay is on real business cycle (RBC) methodology. Those who employ the discipline behind the methodology to address various quantitative questions come up with essentially the same answer—evidence that the theory has a life of its own, directing researchers to essentially the same conclusions when they apply its discipline. Deviations from the theory sometimes arise and remain open for a considerable period before they are resolved by better measurement and extensions of the theory. Elements of the discipline include selecting a model economy or sometimes a set of model economies. The model used to address a specific question or issue must have a consistent set of national accounts with all the accounting identities holding. In addition, the model assumptions must be consistent across applications and be consistent with micro as well as aggregate observations. Reality is complex, and any model economy used is necessarily an abstraction and therefore false. This does not mean, however, that model economies are not useful in drawing scientific inference. The vast number of contributions made by many researchers who have used this methodology precludes reviewing them all in this essay. Instead, the contributions reviewed here are ones that illustrate methodological points or extend the applicability of neoclassical growth theory. Of particular interest will be important developments subsequent to the Cooley and Hansen (1995) volume, Frontiers of Business Cycle Research. The interaction between theory and measurement is emphasized because this is the way in which hard quantitative sciences progress.

KW - Aggregate economic theory

KW - Aggregate financial economics

KW - Aggregation

KW - Business cycle fluctuations

KW - Depressions

KW - Development

KW - Neoclassical growth theory

KW - Prosperities

KW - RBC methodology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85000948012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85000948012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/bs.hesmac.2016.03.001

DO - 10.1016/bs.hesmac.2016.03.001

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:85000948012

SN - 9780444594877

VL - 2

T3 - Handbook of Macroeconomics

SP - 1759

EP - 1787

BT - Handbook of Macroeconomics, 2016

PB - Elsevier B.V.

ER -