Rational responses to high stakes testing: The case of curriculum narrowing and the harm that follows

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

115 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The inevitable responses to high stakes testing, wherein students' test scores are highly consequential for teachers and administrators, include cheating, excessive test preparation, changes in test scoring and other forms of gaming to ensure that test scores appear high. Over the last decade this has been demonstrated convincingly in the USA, but examples in Great Britain abound. Yet the most pernicious response to high stakes testing is perhaps the most rational, namely, curriculum narrowing. In this way more of what is believed to be on the test is taught. Curriculum narrowing, however, reduces many students' chances of being thought talented in school and results in a restriction in the creative and enjoyable activities engaged in by teachers and students. The tests commonly used with narrower curricula also appear to restrict thinking skills. In addition, responses to high stakes environments can easily retard the development of achievement in later grades as a function of the restrictions on learning in earlier grades. Finally, narrowing compromises interpretations of construct validity. The dominance of testing as part of American and British school reform policies insures that many of the skills thought to be most useful in the twenty-first century will not be taught. Thus students and their national economies will suffer when nations rely too heavily on high stakes testing to improve their schools.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)287-302
Number of pages16
JournalCambridge Journal of Education
Volume41
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2011

Fingerprint

curriculum
student
school reform
national economy
reform policy
teacher
construct validity
school
twenty-first century
compromise
interpretation
learning

Keywords

  • assessment
  • curriculum
  • elementary education
  • testing
  • thinking skills

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Rational responses to high stakes testing : The case of curriculum narrowing and the harm that follows. / Berliner, David.

In: Cambridge Journal of Education, Vol. 41, No. 3, 01.09.2011, p. 287-302.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8fe301a06ae6454e8128d113bc653493,
title = "Rational responses to high stakes testing: The case of curriculum narrowing and the harm that follows",
abstract = "The inevitable responses to high stakes testing, wherein students' test scores are highly consequential for teachers and administrators, include cheating, excessive test preparation, changes in test scoring and other forms of gaming to ensure that test scores appear high. Over the last decade this has been demonstrated convincingly in the USA, but examples in Great Britain abound. Yet the most pernicious response to high stakes testing is perhaps the most rational, namely, curriculum narrowing. In this way more of what is believed to be on the test is taught. Curriculum narrowing, however, reduces many students' chances of being thought talented in school and results in a restriction in the creative and enjoyable activities engaged in by teachers and students. The tests commonly used with narrower curricula also appear to restrict thinking skills. In addition, responses to high stakes environments can easily retard the development of achievement in later grades as a function of the restrictions on learning in earlier grades. Finally, narrowing compromises interpretations of construct validity. The dominance of testing as part of American and British school reform policies insures that many of the skills thought to be most useful in the twenty-first century will not be taught. Thus students and their national economies will suffer when nations rely too heavily on high stakes testing to improve their schools.",
keywords = "assessment, curriculum, elementary education, testing, thinking skills",
author = "David Berliner",
year = "2011",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/0305764X.2011.607151",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "287--302",
journal = "Cambridge Journal of Education",
issn = "0305-764X",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rational responses to high stakes testing

T2 - The case of curriculum narrowing and the harm that follows

AU - Berliner, David

PY - 2011/9/1

Y1 - 2011/9/1

N2 - The inevitable responses to high stakes testing, wherein students' test scores are highly consequential for teachers and administrators, include cheating, excessive test preparation, changes in test scoring and other forms of gaming to ensure that test scores appear high. Over the last decade this has been demonstrated convincingly in the USA, but examples in Great Britain abound. Yet the most pernicious response to high stakes testing is perhaps the most rational, namely, curriculum narrowing. In this way more of what is believed to be on the test is taught. Curriculum narrowing, however, reduces many students' chances of being thought talented in school and results in a restriction in the creative and enjoyable activities engaged in by teachers and students. The tests commonly used with narrower curricula also appear to restrict thinking skills. In addition, responses to high stakes environments can easily retard the development of achievement in later grades as a function of the restrictions on learning in earlier grades. Finally, narrowing compromises interpretations of construct validity. The dominance of testing as part of American and British school reform policies insures that many of the skills thought to be most useful in the twenty-first century will not be taught. Thus students and their national economies will suffer when nations rely too heavily on high stakes testing to improve their schools.

AB - The inevitable responses to high stakes testing, wherein students' test scores are highly consequential for teachers and administrators, include cheating, excessive test preparation, changes in test scoring and other forms of gaming to ensure that test scores appear high. Over the last decade this has been demonstrated convincingly in the USA, but examples in Great Britain abound. Yet the most pernicious response to high stakes testing is perhaps the most rational, namely, curriculum narrowing. In this way more of what is believed to be on the test is taught. Curriculum narrowing, however, reduces many students' chances of being thought talented in school and results in a restriction in the creative and enjoyable activities engaged in by teachers and students. The tests commonly used with narrower curricula also appear to restrict thinking skills. In addition, responses to high stakes environments can easily retard the development of achievement in later grades as a function of the restrictions on learning in earlier grades. Finally, narrowing compromises interpretations of construct validity. The dominance of testing as part of American and British school reform policies insures that many of the skills thought to be most useful in the twenty-first century will not be taught. Thus students and their national economies will suffer when nations rely too heavily on high stakes testing to improve their schools.

KW - assessment

KW - curriculum

KW - elementary education

KW - testing

KW - thinking skills

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860722814&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860722814&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0305764X.2011.607151

DO - 10.1080/0305764X.2011.607151

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84860722814

VL - 41

SP - 287

EP - 302

JO - Cambridge Journal of Education

JF - Cambridge Journal of Education

SN - 0305-764X

IS - 3

ER -