Race, place, and information technology

Karen Mossberger, Caroline Tolbert, Michele Gilbert

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

75 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Technology inequalities based on race and ethnicity present a paradox. African-Americans and Latinos have lower rates of access and skill, even controlling for socioeconomic factors. Yet African-Americans, and to a lesser extent, Latinos, also have more positive attitudes toward information technology than similarly situated whites. Because attitudes cannot explain lower rates of access and skill, we hypothesize that racial segregation and concentrated poverty have restricted opportunities to learn about and use technology. Using hierarchical linear modeling and multilevel data to control for both community-level socioeconomic and demographic characteristics and individual-level factors, we find that disparities among African-Americans are due to place effects rather than race. Ethnicity still exercises an independent influence for Latinos. These findings contribute to our understanding of the "digital divide," and to research on the effects of concentrated poverty.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)583-620
Number of pages38
JournalUrban Affairs Review
Volume41
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

African American
information technology
ethnicity
poverty
racial segregation
socioeconomic factors
digital divide
segregation
modeling
community
American
rate
effect

Keywords

  • Concentrated poverty
  • Digital divide
  • Information technology
  • Race
  • Racial segregation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Urban Studies

Cite this

Race, place, and information technology. / Mossberger, Karen; Tolbert, Caroline; Gilbert, Michele.

In: Urban Affairs Review, Vol. 41, No. 5, 05.2006, p. 583-620.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Mossberger, Karen ; Tolbert, Caroline ; Gilbert, Michele. / Race, place, and information technology. In: Urban Affairs Review. 2006 ; Vol. 41, No. 5. pp. 583-620.
@article{2ef155ccdfe84596b81cad75fc3d10f7,
title = "Race, place, and information technology",
abstract = "Technology inequalities based on race and ethnicity present a paradox. African-Americans and Latinos have lower rates of access and skill, even controlling for socioeconomic factors. Yet African-Americans, and to a lesser extent, Latinos, also have more positive attitudes toward information technology than similarly situated whites. Because attitudes cannot explain lower rates of access and skill, we hypothesize that racial segregation and concentrated poverty have restricted opportunities to learn about and use technology. Using hierarchical linear modeling and multilevel data to control for both community-level socioeconomic and demographic characteristics and individual-level factors, we find that disparities among African-Americans are due to place effects rather than race. Ethnicity still exercises an independent influence for Latinos. These findings contribute to our understanding of the {"}digital divide,{"} and to research on the effects of concentrated poverty.",
keywords = "Concentrated poverty, Digital divide, Information technology, Race, Racial segregation",
author = "Karen Mossberger and Caroline Tolbert and Michele Gilbert",
year = "2006",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1177/1078087405283511",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "41",
pages = "583--620",
journal = "Urban Affairs Review",
issn = "1078-0874",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Race, place, and information technology

AU - Mossberger, Karen

AU - Tolbert, Caroline

AU - Gilbert, Michele

PY - 2006/5

Y1 - 2006/5

N2 - Technology inequalities based on race and ethnicity present a paradox. African-Americans and Latinos have lower rates of access and skill, even controlling for socioeconomic factors. Yet African-Americans, and to a lesser extent, Latinos, also have more positive attitudes toward information technology than similarly situated whites. Because attitudes cannot explain lower rates of access and skill, we hypothesize that racial segregation and concentrated poverty have restricted opportunities to learn about and use technology. Using hierarchical linear modeling and multilevel data to control for both community-level socioeconomic and demographic characteristics and individual-level factors, we find that disparities among African-Americans are due to place effects rather than race. Ethnicity still exercises an independent influence for Latinos. These findings contribute to our understanding of the "digital divide," and to research on the effects of concentrated poverty.

AB - Technology inequalities based on race and ethnicity present a paradox. African-Americans and Latinos have lower rates of access and skill, even controlling for socioeconomic factors. Yet African-Americans, and to a lesser extent, Latinos, also have more positive attitudes toward information technology than similarly situated whites. Because attitudes cannot explain lower rates of access and skill, we hypothesize that racial segregation and concentrated poverty have restricted opportunities to learn about and use technology. Using hierarchical linear modeling and multilevel data to control for both community-level socioeconomic and demographic characteristics and individual-level factors, we find that disparities among African-Americans are due to place effects rather than race. Ethnicity still exercises an independent influence for Latinos. These findings contribute to our understanding of the "digital divide," and to research on the effects of concentrated poverty.

KW - Concentrated poverty

KW - Digital divide

KW - Information technology

KW - Race

KW - Racial segregation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645354048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645354048&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1078087405283511

DO - 10.1177/1078087405283511

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33645354048

VL - 41

SP - 583

EP - 620

JO - Urban Affairs Review

JF - Urban Affairs Review

SN - 1078-0874

IS - 5

ER -