TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantitative passive soil vapor sampling for VOCs- part 3
T2 - Field experiments
AU - McAlary, Todd
AU - Groenevelt, Hester
AU - Nicholson, Paul
AU - Seethapathy, Suresh
AU - Sacco, Paolo
AU - Crump, Derrick
AU - Tuday, Michael
AU - Hayes, Heidi
AU - Schumacher, Brian
AU - Johnson, Paul
AU - Górecki, Tadeusz
AU - Rivera-Duarte, Ignacio
PY - 2014/3
Y1 - 2014/3
N2 - Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are commonly associated with contaminated land and may pose a risk to human health via subsurface vapor intrusion to indoor air. Soil vapor sampling is commonly used to assess the nature and extent of VOC contamination, but can be complicated because of the wide range of geologic material permeability and moisture content conditions that might be encountered, the wide variety of available sampling and analysis methods, and several potential causes of bias and variability, including leaks of atmospheric air, adsorption-desorption interactions, inconsistent sampling protocols and varying levels of experience among sampling personnel. Passive sampling onto adsorbent materials has been available as an alternative to conventional whole-gas sample collection for decades, but relationships between the mass sorbed with time and the soil vapor concentration have not been quantitatively established and the relative merits of various commercially available passive samplers for soil vapor concentration measurement is unknown. This paper presents the results of field experiments using several different passive samplers under a wide range of conditions. The results show that properly designed and deployed quantitative passive soil vapor samplers can be used to measure soil vapor concentrations with accuracy and precision comparable to conventional active soil vapor sampling (relative concentrations within a factor of 2 and RSD comparable to active sampling) where the uptake rate is low enough to minimize starvation and the exposure duration is not excessive for weakly retained compounds.
AB - Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are commonly associated with contaminated land and may pose a risk to human health via subsurface vapor intrusion to indoor air. Soil vapor sampling is commonly used to assess the nature and extent of VOC contamination, but can be complicated because of the wide range of geologic material permeability and moisture content conditions that might be encountered, the wide variety of available sampling and analysis methods, and several potential causes of bias and variability, including leaks of atmospheric air, adsorption-desorption interactions, inconsistent sampling protocols and varying levels of experience among sampling personnel. Passive sampling onto adsorbent materials has been available as an alternative to conventional whole-gas sample collection for decades, but relationships between the mass sorbed with time and the soil vapor concentration have not been quantitatively established and the relative merits of various commercially available passive samplers for soil vapor concentration measurement is unknown. This paper presents the results of field experiments using several different passive samplers under a wide range of conditions. The results show that properly designed and deployed quantitative passive soil vapor samplers can be used to measure soil vapor concentrations with accuracy and precision comparable to conventional active soil vapor sampling (relative concentrations within a factor of 2 and RSD comparable to active sampling) where the uptake rate is low enough to minimize starvation and the exposure duration is not excessive for weakly retained compounds.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84895107100&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84895107100&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1039/c3em00653k
DO - 10.1039/c3em00653k
M3 - Article
C2 - 24513784
AN - SCOPUS:84895107100
SN - 2050-7887
VL - 16
SP - 501
EP - 510
JO - Journal of Environmental Monitoring
JF - Journal of Environmental Monitoring
IS - 3
ER -