Quantitative passive soil vapor sampling for VOCs - Part 2

Laboratory experiments

Todd McAlary, Hester Groenevelt, Suresh Seethapathy, Paolo Sacco, Derrick Crump, Michael Tuday, Brian Schumacher, Heidi Hayes, Paul Johnson, Tadeusz Górecki

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Controlled laboratory experiments were conducted to demonstrate the use of passive samplers for soil vapor concentration monitoring. Five different passive samplers were studied (Radiello, SKC Ultra, Waterloo Membrane Sampler, ATD tubes and 3M OVM 3500). Ten different volatile organic compounds were used of varying classes (chlorinated ethanes, ethanes, and methanes, aliphatics and aromatics) and physical properties (vapor pressure, solubility and sorption). Samplers were exposed in randomized triplicates to concentrations of 1, 10 and 100 ppmv, with a relative humidity of ∼80%, a temperature of ∼24 °C, and a duration of 30 minutes in a chamber with a face velocity of about 5 cm min-1. Passive samplers are more commonly used for longer sample durations (e.g., 8 hour workday) and higher face velocities (>600 cm min-1), so testing to verify the performance for these conditions was needed. Summa canister samples were collected and analyzed by EPA Method TO-15 to establish a baseline for comparison for all the passive samplers. Low-uptake rate varieties of four of the samplers were also tested at 10 ppmv under two conditions; with 5 cm min-1 face velocity and stagnant conditions to assess whether low or near-zero face velocities would result in a low bias from the starvation effect. The results indicate that passive samplers can provide concentration measurements with accuracy (mostly within a factor of 2) and precision (RSD < 15%) comparable to conventional Summa canister samples and EPA Method TO-15 analysis. Some compounds are challenging for some passive samplers because of uncertainties in the uptake rates, or challenges with retention or recovery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)491-500
Number of pages10
JournalEnvironmental Sciences: Processes and Impacts
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Ethane
Volatile organic compounds
sampler
volatile organic compound
Soil
Vapors
Sampling
Vapor Pressure
Soils
Volatile Organic Compounds
Methane
sampling
Starvation
Humidity
Solubility
Uncertainty
soil
Experiments
Temperature
Membranes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Cite this

McAlary, T., Groenevelt, H., Seethapathy, S., Sacco, P., Crump, D., Tuday, M., ... Górecki, T. (2014). Quantitative passive soil vapor sampling for VOCs - Part 2: Laboratory experiments. Environmental Sciences: Processes and Impacts, 16(3), 491-500. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3em00128h

Quantitative passive soil vapor sampling for VOCs - Part 2 : Laboratory experiments. / McAlary, Todd; Groenevelt, Hester; Seethapathy, Suresh; Sacco, Paolo; Crump, Derrick; Tuday, Michael; Schumacher, Brian; Hayes, Heidi; Johnson, Paul; Górecki, Tadeusz.

In: Environmental Sciences: Processes and Impacts, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2014, p. 491-500.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McAlary, T, Groenevelt, H, Seethapathy, S, Sacco, P, Crump, D, Tuday, M, Schumacher, B, Hayes, H, Johnson, P & Górecki, T 2014, 'Quantitative passive soil vapor sampling for VOCs - Part 2: Laboratory experiments', Environmental Sciences: Processes and Impacts, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 491-500. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3em00128h
McAlary, Todd ; Groenevelt, Hester ; Seethapathy, Suresh ; Sacco, Paolo ; Crump, Derrick ; Tuday, Michael ; Schumacher, Brian ; Hayes, Heidi ; Johnson, Paul ; Górecki, Tadeusz. / Quantitative passive soil vapor sampling for VOCs - Part 2 : Laboratory experiments. In: Environmental Sciences: Processes and Impacts. 2014 ; Vol. 16, No. 3. pp. 491-500.
@article{1d48f3c2eb944145b56961d36a06870e,
title = "Quantitative passive soil vapor sampling for VOCs - Part 2: Laboratory experiments",
abstract = "Controlled laboratory experiments were conducted to demonstrate the use of passive samplers for soil vapor concentration monitoring. Five different passive samplers were studied (Radiello, SKC Ultra, Waterloo Membrane Sampler, ATD tubes and 3M OVM 3500). Ten different volatile organic compounds were used of varying classes (chlorinated ethanes, ethanes, and methanes, aliphatics and aromatics) and physical properties (vapor pressure, solubility and sorption). Samplers were exposed in randomized triplicates to concentrations of 1, 10 and 100 ppmv, with a relative humidity of ∼80{\%}, a temperature of ∼24 °C, and a duration of 30 minutes in a chamber with a face velocity of about 5 cm min-1. Passive samplers are more commonly used for longer sample durations (e.g., 8 hour workday) and higher face velocities (>600 cm min-1), so testing to verify the performance for these conditions was needed. Summa canister samples were collected and analyzed by EPA Method TO-15 to establish a baseline for comparison for all the passive samplers. Low-uptake rate varieties of four of the samplers were also tested at 10 ppmv under two conditions; with 5 cm min-1 face velocity and stagnant conditions to assess whether low or near-zero face velocities would result in a low bias from the starvation effect. The results indicate that passive samplers can provide concentration measurements with accuracy (mostly within a factor of 2) and precision (RSD < 15{\%}) comparable to conventional Summa canister samples and EPA Method TO-15 analysis. Some compounds are challenging for some passive samplers because of uncertainties in the uptake rates, or challenges with retention or recovery.",
author = "Todd McAlary and Hester Groenevelt and Suresh Seethapathy and Paolo Sacco and Derrick Crump and Michael Tuday and Brian Schumacher and Heidi Hayes and Paul Johnson and Tadeusz G{\'o}recki",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1039/c3em00128h",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "491--500",
journal = "Environmental Sciences: Processes and Impacts",
issn = "2050-7887",
publisher = "Royal Society of Chemistry",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantitative passive soil vapor sampling for VOCs - Part 2

T2 - Laboratory experiments

AU - McAlary, Todd

AU - Groenevelt, Hester

AU - Seethapathy, Suresh

AU - Sacco, Paolo

AU - Crump, Derrick

AU - Tuday, Michael

AU - Schumacher, Brian

AU - Hayes, Heidi

AU - Johnson, Paul

AU - Górecki, Tadeusz

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Controlled laboratory experiments were conducted to demonstrate the use of passive samplers for soil vapor concentration monitoring. Five different passive samplers were studied (Radiello, SKC Ultra, Waterloo Membrane Sampler, ATD tubes and 3M OVM 3500). Ten different volatile organic compounds were used of varying classes (chlorinated ethanes, ethanes, and methanes, aliphatics and aromatics) and physical properties (vapor pressure, solubility and sorption). Samplers were exposed in randomized triplicates to concentrations of 1, 10 and 100 ppmv, with a relative humidity of ∼80%, a temperature of ∼24 °C, and a duration of 30 minutes in a chamber with a face velocity of about 5 cm min-1. Passive samplers are more commonly used for longer sample durations (e.g., 8 hour workday) and higher face velocities (>600 cm min-1), so testing to verify the performance for these conditions was needed. Summa canister samples were collected and analyzed by EPA Method TO-15 to establish a baseline for comparison for all the passive samplers. Low-uptake rate varieties of four of the samplers were also tested at 10 ppmv under two conditions; with 5 cm min-1 face velocity and stagnant conditions to assess whether low or near-zero face velocities would result in a low bias from the starvation effect. The results indicate that passive samplers can provide concentration measurements with accuracy (mostly within a factor of 2) and precision (RSD < 15%) comparable to conventional Summa canister samples and EPA Method TO-15 analysis. Some compounds are challenging for some passive samplers because of uncertainties in the uptake rates, or challenges with retention or recovery.

AB - Controlled laboratory experiments were conducted to demonstrate the use of passive samplers for soil vapor concentration monitoring. Five different passive samplers were studied (Radiello, SKC Ultra, Waterloo Membrane Sampler, ATD tubes and 3M OVM 3500). Ten different volatile organic compounds were used of varying classes (chlorinated ethanes, ethanes, and methanes, aliphatics and aromatics) and physical properties (vapor pressure, solubility and sorption). Samplers were exposed in randomized triplicates to concentrations of 1, 10 and 100 ppmv, with a relative humidity of ∼80%, a temperature of ∼24 °C, and a duration of 30 minutes in a chamber with a face velocity of about 5 cm min-1. Passive samplers are more commonly used for longer sample durations (e.g., 8 hour workday) and higher face velocities (>600 cm min-1), so testing to verify the performance for these conditions was needed. Summa canister samples were collected and analyzed by EPA Method TO-15 to establish a baseline for comparison for all the passive samplers. Low-uptake rate varieties of four of the samplers were also tested at 10 ppmv under two conditions; with 5 cm min-1 face velocity and stagnant conditions to assess whether low or near-zero face velocities would result in a low bias from the starvation effect. The results indicate that passive samplers can provide concentration measurements with accuracy (mostly within a factor of 2) and precision (RSD < 15%) comparable to conventional Summa canister samples and EPA Method TO-15 analysis. Some compounds are challenging for some passive samplers because of uncertainties in the uptake rates, or challenges with retention or recovery.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84895192907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84895192907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1039/c3em00128h

DO - 10.1039/c3em00128h

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 491

EP - 500

JO - Environmental Sciences: Processes and Impacts

JF - Environmental Sciences: Processes and Impacts

SN - 2050-7887

IS - 3

ER -