Quantitative and qualitative comparison of low-temperature, heat-activated cooling systems

Y. Gupta, L. Metchop, T. Frantzis, Patrick Phelan

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper compares the quantitative and qualitative performances of three different heat-activated cooling systems, e.g. a silica-gel water adsorption system, a LiBr-H2O absorption system, and a desiccant air system. Each of these systems can be utilized at relatively low heat source temperatures, but it is unclear which of these systems is best suited to what range of heat source temperature. Our study explores answers to this question by generating quantitative results comparing their relative thermal performance, i.e. COP and refrigeration capacity, and a qualitative comparison based on the size, maturity of technology, safe operation, etc. Each of these systems is assumed to work under the following operating conditions: a condensing temperature of 29 °C, an evaporating temperature of 19 °C, a hot water temperature range of 40-120 °C, and a hot water mass flow rate of 0.4 kg/sec. Individual mathematical models are developed for each system and numerically solved using different techniques. In order to provide a fair comparison between the fundamentally different systems, a UA (overall heat transfer coefficient multiplied by the heat transfer area) value of 1.0 kW/°C is considered for the heat exchanger that transfers heat from the supplied hot water. Furthermore, to compare systems of similar size, the mass of silica gel in adsorption and desiccant system and mass of LiBr-H2O solution in absorption system were specified such that each system provides the same amount of refrigeration (8.0 kW) at a source temperature of 90 °C. It is found that the absorption and adsorption cooling systems have a higher refrigeration capacity at heat source temperatures below 90 °C, while the desiccant air system outperforms the others at temperatures above 90 °C.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers, Advanced Energy Systems Division (Publication) AES
PublisherAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
ISBN (Print)0791837904, 9780791837900
DOIs
StatePublished - 2006
Event2006 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, IMECE2006 - Chicago, IL, United States
Duration: Nov 5 2006Nov 10 2006

Other

Other2006 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, IMECE2006
CountryUnited States
CityChicago, IL
Period11/5/0611/10/06

Fingerprint

Cooling systems
Refrigeration
Temperature
Silica gel
Adsorption
Water
Heat transfer
Hot Temperature
Air
Heat transfer coefficients
Heat exchangers
Flow rate
Mathematical models

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Energy Engineering and Power Technology

Cite this

Gupta, Y., Metchop, L., Frantzis, T., & Phelan, P. (2006). Quantitative and qualitative comparison of low-temperature, heat-activated cooling systems. In American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Advanced Energy Systems Division (Publication) AES American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2006-14489

Quantitative and qualitative comparison of low-temperature, heat-activated cooling systems. / Gupta, Y.; Metchop, L.; Frantzis, T.; Phelan, Patrick.

American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Advanced Energy Systems Division (Publication) AES. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 2006.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Gupta, Y, Metchop, L, Frantzis, T & Phelan, P 2006, Quantitative and qualitative comparison of low-temperature, heat-activated cooling systems. in American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Advanced Energy Systems Division (Publication) AES. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 2006 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, IMECE2006, Chicago, IL, United States, 11/5/06. https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2006-14489
Gupta Y, Metchop L, Frantzis T, Phelan P. Quantitative and qualitative comparison of low-temperature, heat-activated cooling systems. In American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Advanced Energy Systems Division (Publication) AES. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). 2006 https://doi.org/10.1115/IMECE2006-14489
Gupta, Y. ; Metchop, L. ; Frantzis, T. ; Phelan, Patrick. / Quantitative and qualitative comparison of low-temperature, heat-activated cooling systems. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Advanced Energy Systems Division (Publication) AES. American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), 2006.
@inproceedings{7a2c3167aca04bfba97cc24c49c56d5e,
title = "Quantitative and qualitative comparison of low-temperature, heat-activated cooling systems",
abstract = "This paper compares the quantitative and qualitative performances of three different heat-activated cooling systems, e.g. a silica-gel water adsorption system, a LiBr-H2O absorption system, and a desiccant air system. Each of these systems can be utilized at relatively low heat source temperatures, but it is unclear which of these systems is best suited to what range of heat source temperature. Our study explores answers to this question by generating quantitative results comparing their relative thermal performance, i.e. COP and refrigeration capacity, and a qualitative comparison based on the size, maturity of technology, safe operation, etc. Each of these systems is assumed to work under the following operating conditions: a condensing temperature of 29 °C, an evaporating temperature of 19 °C, a hot water temperature range of 40-120 °C, and a hot water mass flow rate of 0.4 kg/sec. Individual mathematical models are developed for each system and numerically solved using different techniques. In order to provide a fair comparison between the fundamentally different systems, a UA (overall heat transfer coefficient multiplied by the heat transfer area) value of 1.0 kW/°C is considered for the heat exchanger that transfers heat from the supplied hot water. Furthermore, to compare systems of similar size, the mass of silica gel in adsorption and desiccant system and mass of LiBr-H2O solution in absorption system were specified such that each system provides the same amount of refrigeration (8.0 kW) at a source temperature of 90 °C. It is found that the absorption and adsorption cooling systems have a higher refrigeration capacity at heat source temperatures below 90 °C, while the desiccant air system outperforms the others at temperatures above 90 °C.",
author = "Y. Gupta and L. Metchop and T. Frantzis and Patrick Phelan",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1115/IMECE2006-14489",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "0791837904",
booktitle = "American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Advanced Energy Systems Division (Publication) AES",
publisher = "American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Quantitative and qualitative comparison of low-temperature, heat-activated cooling systems

AU - Gupta, Y.

AU - Metchop, L.

AU - Frantzis, T.

AU - Phelan, Patrick

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - This paper compares the quantitative and qualitative performances of three different heat-activated cooling systems, e.g. a silica-gel water adsorption system, a LiBr-H2O absorption system, and a desiccant air system. Each of these systems can be utilized at relatively low heat source temperatures, but it is unclear which of these systems is best suited to what range of heat source temperature. Our study explores answers to this question by generating quantitative results comparing their relative thermal performance, i.e. COP and refrigeration capacity, and a qualitative comparison based on the size, maturity of technology, safe operation, etc. Each of these systems is assumed to work under the following operating conditions: a condensing temperature of 29 °C, an evaporating temperature of 19 °C, a hot water temperature range of 40-120 °C, and a hot water mass flow rate of 0.4 kg/sec. Individual mathematical models are developed for each system and numerically solved using different techniques. In order to provide a fair comparison between the fundamentally different systems, a UA (overall heat transfer coefficient multiplied by the heat transfer area) value of 1.0 kW/°C is considered for the heat exchanger that transfers heat from the supplied hot water. Furthermore, to compare systems of similar size, the mass of silica gel in adsorption and desiccant system and mass of LiBr-H2O solution in absorption system were specified such that each system provides the same amount of refrigeration (8.0 kW) at a source temperature of 90 °C. It is found that the absorption and adsorption cooling systems have a higher refrigeration capacity at heat source temperatures below 90 °C, while the desiccant air system outperforms the others at temperatures above 90 °C.

AB - This paper compares the quantitative and qualitative performances of three different heat-activated cooling systems, e.g. a silica-gel water adsorption system, a LiBr-H2O absorption system, and a desiccant air system. Each of these systems can be utilized at relatively low heat source temperatures, but it is unclear which of these systems is best suited to what range of heat source temperature. Our study explores answers to this question by generating quantitative results comparing their relative thermal performance, i.e. COP and refrigeration capacity, and a qualitative comparison based on the size, maturity of technology, safe operation, etc. Each of these systems is assumed to work under the following operating conditions: a condensing temperature of 29 °C, an evaporating temperature of 19 °C, a hot water temperature range of 40-120 °C, and a hot water mass flow rate of 0.4 kg/sec. Individual mathematical models are developed for each system and numerically solved using different techniques. In order to provide a fair comparison between the fundamentally different systems, a UA (overall heat transfer coefficient multiplied by the heat transfer area) value of 1.0 kW/°C is considered for the heat exchanger that transfers heat from the supplied hot water. Furthermore, to compare systems of similar size, the mass of silica gel in adsorption and desiccant system and mass of LiBr-H2O solution in absorption system were specified such that each system provides the same amount of refrigeration (8.0 kW) at a source temperature of 90 °C. It is found that the absorption and adsorption cooling systems have a higher refrigeration capacity at heat source temperatures below 90 °C, while the desiccant air system outperforms the others at temperatures above 90 °C.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920629337&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920629337&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1115/IMECE2006-14489

DO - 10.1115/IMECE2006-14489

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84920629337

SN - 0791837904

SN - 9780791837900

BT - American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Advanced Energy Systems Division (Publication) AES

PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)

ER -