Abstract
The 2007–2009 recession significantly affected the U.S. construction industry, with unemployment peaking at approximately 20%. In such circumstances, construction companies must devise strategies to adapt to and even counteract declining revenue. One tactic is to reduce home office overhead costs, such as bonuses, rent, and business development expenses. The purpose of this study was to examine the degree to which construction companies reduced overhead costs in response to a market downturn, and whether these reductions are correlated with companies’ demographic attributes. A total of 437 contractors across the United States completed a survey on how much their companies reduced expenses; 92% of the respondents reported that their companies reduced overhead in at least one area, by an average of about 15%. Companies with revenue of $100.1 million to $500 million and that primarily performed manufacturing work tended to reduce overhead costs more than other types of construction companies. This study also reveals that larger companies made fewer reductions to overhead, with the exception being roofers who made very minimal reductions regardless of their annual revenue. The Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) industry can use the data presented in this study to anticipate reductions in overhead spending that future distressed market conditions may necessitate.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-18 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | International Journal of Construction Education and Research |
| DOIs | |
| State | Accepted/In press - May 16 2018 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Company size
- financial management
- home office overhead
- recession
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Building and Construction
- Education
Cite this
Quantifying the impact of the Great Recession on the AEC industry—a call to reevaluate home office overhead costs. / Smithwick, Jake B.; Schleifer, Thomas C.; Sawyer, Jeff T.; Sullivan, Kenneth.
In: International Journal of Construction Education and Research, 16.05.2018, p. 1-18.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantifying the impact of the Great Recession on the AEC industry—a call to reevaluate home office overhead costs
AU - Smithwick, Jake B.
AU - Schleifer, Thomas C.
AU - Sawyer, Jeff T.
AU - Sullivan, Kenneth
PY - 2018/5/16
Y1 - 2018/5/16
N2 - The 2007–2009 recession significantly affected the U.S. construction industry, with unemployment peaking at approximately 20%. In such circumstances, construction companies must devise strategies to adapt to and even counteract declining revenue. One tactic is to reduce home office overhead costs, such as bonuses, rent, and business development expenses. The purpose of this study was to examine the degree to which construction companies reduced overhead costs in response to a market downturn, and whether these reductions are correlated with companies’ demographic attributes. A total of 437 contractors across the United States completed a survey on how much their companies reduced expenses; 92% of the respondents reported that their companies reduced overhead in at least one area, by an average of about 15%. Companies with revenue of $100.1 million to $500 million and that primarily performed manufacturing work tended to reduce overhead costs more than other types of construction companies. This study also reveals that larger companies made fewer reductions to overhead, with the exception being roofers who made very minimal reductions regardless of their annual revenue. The Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) industry can use the data presented in this study to anticipate reductions in overhead spending that future distressed market conditions may necessitate.
AB - The 2007–2009 recession significantly affected the U.S. construction industry, with unemployment peaking at approximately 20%. In such circumstances, construction companies must devise strategies to adapt to and even counteract declining revenue. One tactic is to reduce home office overhead costs, such as bonuses, rent, and business development expenses. The purpose of this study was to examine the degree to which construction companies reduced overhead costs in response to a market downturn, and whether these reductions are correlated with companies’ demographic attributes. A total of 437 contractors across the United States completed a survey on how much their companies reduced expenses; 92% of the respondents reported that their companies reduced overhead in at least one area, by an average of about 15%. Companies with revenue of $100.1 million to $500 million and that primarily performed manufacturing work tended to reduce overhead costs more than other types of construction companies. This study also reveals that larger companies made fewer reductions to overhead, with the exception being roofers who made very minimal reductions regardless of their annual revenue. The Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) industry can use the data presented in this study to anticipate reductions in overhead spending that future distressed market conditions may necessitate.
KW - Company size
KW - financial management
KW - home office overhead
KW - recession
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85047011673&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85047011673&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15578771.2018.1473308
DO - 10.1080/15578771.2018.1473308
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85047011673
SP - 1
EP - 18
JO - International Journal of Construction Education and Research
JF - International Journal of Construction Education and Research
SN - 1550-3984
ER -