Abstract

This paper evaluates the performance of liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) and solid phase extraction (SPE) in separating and concentrating aqueous fullerene (nC60) from wastewater and compares UV-vis spectroscopy and mass spectrometry for the quantification of C60. LLE was suitable for multiple wastewater matrices, while SPE required filtration or reclaimed wastewater and secondary effluent of less suspended solids. Calibration curves plotted as peak areas of UV absorbance at 332nm against spiked nC60 concentrations showed good linearity over a range of 20-200μgL-1 after 10-fold concentration by LLE, but only over the range of 0.8-2μgL-1 for reclaimed wastewater and 0.8-4μgL-1 for secondary effluent after 1000-fold concentration by SPE. Recoveries of nC60 by LLE were in the range of 89-94% with a standard deviation (SD) not more than 2% and recoveries of nC60 by SPE were much lower, only 18% for reclaimed wastewater and 9% for secondary effluent. The method detection limits (MDLs) of LLE with UV-vis spectroscopy were 3-4μgL-1 for six water matrices and the MDLs of SPE with UV-vis spectroscopy were 0.42μgL-1 for reclaimed wastewater and 0.64μgL-1 for secondary effluent. UV-vis spectroscopy and mass spectrometry gave similar sensitivity. With LLE, mass spectrometry offered a small linear range of 20-60μgL-1, but it provided specificity based on the mass-to-charge ratios (m/z) of the molecular ions. This paper demonstrates the feasibility of the combination of different extraction and detection methods to quantify nC60 in engineered wastewater matrices.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)334-339
Number of pages6
JournalChemosphere
Volume80
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2010

Fingerprint

Fullerenes
fullerene
High performance liquid chromatography
Liquid-Liquid Extraction
Waste Water
liquid chromatography
Wastewater
Solid Phase Extraction
High Pressure Liquid Chromatography
wastewater
liquid
Liquids
Spectrum Analysis
Mass Spectrometry
Ultraviolet spectroscopy
Effluents
detection method
Limit of Detection
spectroscopy
effluent

Keywords

  • C
  • Liquid-liquid extraction
  • Nanomaterial
  • Solid phase extraction
  • Wastewater

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Chemistry(all)

Cite this

@article{7a6194f3a58743aca56757a0f065fba6,
title = "Quantification of fullerene aggregate nC60 in wastewater by high-performance liquid chromatography with UV-vis spectroscopic and mass spectrometric detection",
abstract = "This paper evaluates the performance of liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) and solid phase extraction (SPE) in separating and concentrating aqueous fullerene (nC60) from wastewater and compares UV-vis spectroscopy and mass spectrometry for the quantification of C60. LLE was suitable for multiple wastewater matrices, while SPE required filtration or reclaimed wastewater and secondary effluent of less suspended solids. Calibration curves plotted as peak areas of UV absorbance at 332nm against spiked nC60 concentrations showed good linearity over a range of 20-200μgL-1 after 10-fold concentration by LLE, but only over the range of 0.8-2μgL-1 for reclaimed wastewater and 0.8-4μgL-1 for secondary effluent after 1000-fold concentration by SPE. Recoveries of nC60 by LLE were in the range of 89-94{\%} with a standard deviation (SD) not more than 2{\%} and recoveries of nC60 by SPE were much lower, only 18{\%} for reclaimed wastewater and 9{\%} for secondary effluent. The method detection limits (MDLs) of LLE with UV-vis spectroscopy were 3-4μgL-1 for six water matrices and the MDLs of SPE with UV-vis spectroscopy were 0.42μgL-1 for reclaimed wastewater and 0.64μgL-1 for secondary effluent. UV-vis spectroscopy and mass spectrometry gave similar sensitivity. With LLE, mass spectrometry offered a small linear range of 20-60μgL-1, but it provided specificity based on the mass-to-charge ratios (m/z) of the molecular ions. This paper demonstrates the feasibility of the combination of different extraction and detection methods to quantify nC60 in engineered wastewater matrices.",
keywords = "C, Liquid-liquid extraction, Nanomaterial, Solid phase extraction, Wastewater",
author = "Chao Wang and Chii Shang and Paul Westerhoff",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.03.052",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "80",
pages = "334--339",
journal = "Chemosphere",
issn = "0045-6535",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantification of fullerene aggregate nC60 in wastewater by high-performance liquid chromatography with UV-vis spectroscopic and mass spectrometric detection

AU - Wang, Chao

AU - Shang, Chii

AU - Westerhoff, Paul

PY - 2010/6

Y1 - 2010/6

N2 - This paper evaluates the performance of liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) and solid phase extraction (SPE) in separating and concentrating aqueous fullerene (nC60) from wastewater and compares UV-vis spectroscopy and mass spectrometry for the quantification of C60. LLE was suitable for multiple wastewater matrices, while SPE required filtration or reclaimed wastewater and secondary effluent of less suspended solids. Calibration curves plotted as peak areas of UV absorbance at 332nm against spiked nC60 concentrations showed good linearity over a range of 20-200μgL-1 after 10-fold concentration by LLE, but only over the range of 0.8-2μgL-1 for reclaimed wastewater and 0.8-4μgL-1 for secondary effluent after 1000-fold concentration by SPE. Recoveries of nC60 by LLE were in the range of 89-94% with a standard deviation (SD) not more than 2% and recoveries of nC60 by SPE were much lower, only 18% for reclaimed wastewater and 9% for secondary effluent. The method detection limits (MDLs) of LLE with UV-vis spectroscopy were 3-4μgL-1 for six water matrices and the MDLs of SPE with UV-vis spectroscopy were 0.42μgL-1 for reclaimed wastewater and 0.64μgL-1 for secondary effluent. UV-vis spectroscopy and mass spectrometry gave similar sensitivity. With LLE, mass spectrometry offered a small linear range of 20-60μgL-1, but it provided specificity based on the mass-to-charge ratios (m/z) of the molecular ions. This paper demonstrates the feasibility of the combination of different extraction and detection methods to quantify nC60 in engineered wastewater matrices.

AB - This paper evaluates the performance of liquid-liquid extraction (LLE) and solid phase extraction (SPE) in separating and concentrating aqueous fullerene (nC60) from wastewater and compares UV-vis spectroscopy and mass spectrometry for the quantification of C60. LLE was suitable for multiple wastewater matrices, while SPE required filtration or reclaimed wastewater and secondary effluent of less suspended solids. Calibration curves plotted as peak areas of UV absorbance at 332nm against spiked nC60 concentrations showed good linearity over a range of 20-200μgL-1 after 10-fold concentration by LLE, but only over the range of 0.8-2μgL-1 for reclaimed wastewater and 0.8-4μgL-1 for secondary effluent after 1000-fold concentration by SPE. Recoveries of nC60 by LLE were in the range of 89-94% with a standard deviation (SD) not more than 2% and recoveries of nC60 by SPE were much lower, only 18% for reclaimed wastewater and 9% for secondary effluent. The method detection limits (MDLs) of LLE with UV-vis spectroscopy were 3-4μgL-1 for six water matrices and the MDLs of SPE with UV-vis spectroscopy were 0.42μgL-1 for reclaimed wastewater and 0.64μgL-1 for secondary effluent. UV-vis spectroscopy and mass spectrometry gave similar sensitivity. With LLE, mass spectrometry offered a small linear range of 20-60μgL-1, but it provided specificity based on the mass-to-charge ratios (m/z) of the molecular ions. This paper demonstrates the feasibility of the combination of different extraction and detection methods to quantify nC60 in engineered wastewater matrices.

KW - C

KW - Liquid-liquid extraction

KW - Nanomaterial

KW - Solid phase extraction

KW - Wastewater

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953357419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953357419&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.03.052

DO - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.03.052

M3 - Article

C2 - 20417954

AN - SCOPUS:77953357419

VL - 80

SP - 334

EP - 339

JO - Chemosphere

JF - Chemosphere

SN - 0045-6535

IS - 3

ER -