TY - JOUR
T1 - Quantification of Carbon Nanotubes in Environmental Matrices
T2 - Current Capabilities, Case Studies, and Future Prospects
AU - Petersen, Elijah J.
AU - Flores-Cervantes, D. Xanat
AU - Bucheli, Thomas D.
AU - Elliott, Lindsay C C
AU - Fagan, Jeffrey A.
AU - Gogos, Alexander
AU - Hanna, Shannon
AU - Kägi, Ralf
AU - Mansfield, Elisabeth
AU - Bustos, Antonio R Montoro
AU - Plata, Desiree L.
AU - Reipa, Vytas
AU - Westerhoff, Paul
AU - Winchester, Michael R.
N1 - Funding Information:
The contributions of A.G. and T.D.B. were provided as part of the project Effects of NANOparticles on beneficial soil MIcrobes and CROPS (NANOMICROPS), within the Swiss National Research Programme NRP 64 Opportunities and Risks of Nanomaterials. AG and TDB thank the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) for financial support. DLP acknowledges support from NSF CBET # 1336794. D.X. Flores-Cervantes is very grateful to Hans-Peter Kohler for his
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 American Chemical Society.
PY - 2016/5/3
Y1 - 2016/5/3
N2 - Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have numerous exciting potential applications and some that have reached commercialization. As such, quantitative measurements of CNTs in key environmental matrices (water, soil, sediment, and biological tissues) are needed to address concerns about their potential environmental and human health risks and to inform application development. However, standard methods for CNT quantification are not yet available. We systematically and critically review each component of the current methods for CNT quantification including CNT extraction approaches, potential biases, limits of detection, and potential for standardization. This review reveals that many of the techniques with the lowest detection limits require uncommon equipment or expertise, and thus, they are not frequently accessible. Additionally, changes to the CNTs (e.g., agglomeration) after environmental release and matrix effects can cause biases for many of the techniques, and biasing factors vary among the techniques. Five case studies are provided to illustrate how to use this information to inform responses to real-world scenarios such as monitoring potential CNT discharge into a river or ecotoxicity testing by a testing laboratory. Overall, substantial progress has been made in improving CNT quantification during the past ten years, but additional work is needed for standardization, development of extraction techniques from complex matrices, and multimethod comparisons of standard samples to reveal the comparability of techniques.
AB - Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have numerous exciting potential applications and some that have reached commercialization. As such, quantitative measurements of CNTs in key environmental matrices (water, soil, sediment, and biological tissues) are needed to address concerns about their potential environmental and human health risks and to inform application development. However, standard methods for CNT quantification are not yet available. We systematically and critically review each component of the current methods for CNT quantification including CNT extraction approaches, potential biases, limits of detection, and potential for standardization. This review reveals that many of the techniques with the lowest detection limits require uncommon equipment or expertise, and thus, they are not frequently accessible. Additionally, changes to the CNTs (e.g., agglomeration) after environmental release and matrix effects can cause biases for many of the techniques, and biasing factors vary among the techniques. Five case studies are provided to illustrate how to use this information to inform responses to real-world scenarios such as monitoring potential CNT discharge into a river or ecotoxicity testing by a testing laboratory. Overall, substantial progress has been made in improving CNT quantification during the past ten years, but additional work is needed for standardization, development of extraction techniques from complex matrices, and multimethod comparisons of standard samples to reveal the comparability of techniques.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84968763898&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84968763898&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.est.5b05647
DO - 10.1021/acs.est.5b05647
M3 - Review article
C2 - 27050152
AN - SCOPUS:84968763898
SN - 0013-936X
VL - 50
SP - 4587
EP - 4605
JO - Environmental Science & Technology
JF - Environmental Science & Technology
IS - 9
ER -