Quality of alternatives, institutional preference, and institutional commitment among first‐year college students

Morris Alan Okun, Brian Goegan, Natasha Mitric

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We tested the hypotheses derived from investment theory that quality of alternatives and institutional preference exert additive and interactive effects on institutional commitment in a sample of 1166 first‐year college students at a large state university, who were surveyed within two weeks of the start of their first semester. As predicted, a hierarchical regression analysis revealed: as quality of alternatives increased, institutional commitment decreased; as preference for the university increased, institutional commitment increased; and as institutional preference decreased, the inverse relation between quality of alternatives and institutional commitment increased. The findings of the present study suggest that first‐year college students who do not rank their university as one of their top three choices and who rate the quality of alternatives as high should be classified as at risk of dropping out and targeted for proactive advising.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)371-383
Number of pages13
JournalEducational Psychology
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2009

Fingerprint

commitment
Students
university
student
Regression Analysis
semester
regression analysis

Keywords

  • higher education
  • motivation
  • tertiary

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Education

Cite this

Quality of alternatives, institutional preference, and institutional commitment among first‐year college students. / Okun, Morris Alan; Goegan, Brian; Mitric, Natasha.

In: Educational Psychology, Vol. 29, No. 4, 01.07.2009, p. 371-383.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Okun, Morris Alan ; Goegan, Brian ; Mitric, Natasha. / Quality of alternatives, institutional preference, and institutional commitment among first‐year college students. In: Educational Psychology. 2009 ; Vol. 29, No. 4. pp. 371-383.
@article{f24d7135141a4a5895ff8e083ad2a254,
title = "Quality of alternatives, institutional preference, and institutional commitment among first‐year college students",
abstract = "We tested the hypotheses derived from investment theory that quality of alternatives and institutional preference exert additive and interactive effects on institutional commitment in a sample of 1166 first‐year college students at a large state university, who were surveyed within two weeks of the start of their first semester. As predicted, a hierarchical regression analysis revealed: as quality of alternatives increased, institutional commitment decreased; as preference for the university increased, institutional commitment increased; and as institutional preference decreased, the inverse relation between quality of alternatives and institutional commitment increased. The findings of the present study suggest that first‐year college students who do not rank their university as one of their top three choices and who rate the quality of alternatives as high should be classified as at risk of dropping out and targeted for proactive advising.",
keywords = "higher education, motivation, tertiary",
author = "Okun, {Morris Alan} and Brian Goegan and Natasha Mitric",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/01443410902957079",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "371--383",
journal = "Educational Psychology",
issn = "0144-3410",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality of alternatives, institutional preference, and institutional commitment among first‐year college students

AU - Okun, Morris Alan

AU - Goegan, Brian

AU - Mitric, Natasha

PY - 2009/7/1

Y1 - 2009/7/1

N2 - We tested the hypotheses derived from investment theory that quality of alternatives and institutional preference exert additive and interactive effects on institutional commitment in a sample of 1166 first‐year college students at a large state university, who were surveyed within two weeks of the start of their first semester. As predicted, a hierarchical regression analysis revealed: as quality of alternatives increased, institutional commitment decreased; as preference for the university increased, institutional commitment increased; and as institutional preference decreased, the inverse relation between quality of alternatives and institutional commitment increased. The findings of the present study suggest that first‐year college students who do not rank their university as one of their top three choices and who rate the quality of alternatives as high should be classified as at risk of dropping out and targeted for proactive advising.

AB - We tested the hypotheses derived from investment theory that quality of alternatives and institutional preference exert additive and interactive effects on institutional commitment in a sample of 1166 first‐year college students at a large state university, who were surveyed within two weeks of the start of their first semester. As predicted, a hierarchical regression analysis revealed: as quality of alternatives increased, institutional commitment decreased; as preference for the university increased, institutional commitment increased; and as institutional preference decreased, the inverse relation between quality of alternatives and institutional commitment increased. The findings of the present study suggest that first‐year college students who do not rank their university as one of their top three choices and who rate the quality of alternatives as high should be classified as at risk of dropping out and targeted for proactive advising.

KW - higher education

KW - motivation

KW - tertiary

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84880443883&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84880443883&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01443410902957079

DO - 10.1080/01443410902957079

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84880443883

VL - 29

SP - 371

EP - 383

JO - Educational Psychology

JF - Educational Psychology

SN - 0144-3410

IS - 4

ER -