Quality management programs in the construction industry: Best value compared with other methodologies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

40 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The drive to maintain competitiveness by increasing performance has been an ever-present goal of industries within the global market. Although many industries have benefited from classical quality management programs such as total quality management (TQM), lean production, and six sigma, the construction industry has remained primarily unaffected. This paper analyzes these three popular programs, the basis for their success and failures, and their documented level of susceptibility in the construction industry. These programs are then contrasted to the best value system, an owner-driven quality program that has been tested recently in the construction industry and documented to produce encouraging results. On the basis of the findings, it is proposed that most quality management programs are designed to be instigated by the vendor, by improving the company's ability to deliver a quantifiable, replicable product or service. This is significant because it indicates that although the underlying principles of the classic quality management programs are relevant to all markets, the processes and methods of application may be inappropriate for an industry that dispenses highly diverse or integrated products or services, such as construction.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)210-219
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Management in Engineering
Volume27
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2011

Fingerprint

Quality management
Construction industry
Industry
Total quality management
Methodology

Keywords

  • Best value
  • Construction industry
  • Lean
  • Quality control
  • Quality management
  • Six sigma
  • TQM

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Engineering(all)
  • Strategy and Management
  • Industrial relations
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Cite this

@article{2c014e6301364358a9c33cf47098f3c3,
title = "Quality management programs in the construction industry: Best value compared with other methodologies",
abstract = "The drive to maintain competitiveness by increasing performance has been an ever-present goal of industries within the global market. Although many industries have benefited from classical quality management programs such as total quality management (TQM), lean production, and six sigma, the construction industry has remained primarily unaffected. This paper analyzes these three popular programs, the basis for their success and failures, and their documented level of susceptibility in the construction industry. These programs are then contrasted to the best value system, an owner-driven quality program that has been tested recently in the construction industry and documented to produce encouraging results. On the basis of the findings, it is proposed that most quality management programs are designed to be instigated by the vendor, by improving the company's ability to deliver a quantifiable, replicable product or service. This is significant because it indicates that although the underlying principles of the classic quality management programs are relevant to all markets, the processes and methods of application may be inappropriate for an industry that dispenses highly diverse or integrated products or services, such as construction.",
keywords = "Best value, Construction industry, Lean, Quality control, Quality management, Six sigma, TQM",
author = "Kenneth Sullivan",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000054",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "210--219",
journal = "Journal of Management in Engineering - ASCE",
issn = "0742-597X",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality management programs in the construction industry

T2 - Best value compared with other methodologies

AU - Sullivan, Kenneth

PY - 2011/10

Y1 - 2011/10

N2 - The drive to maintain competitiveness by increasing performance has been an ever-present goal of industries within the global market. Although many industries have benefited from classical quality management programs such as total quality management (TQM), lean production, and six sigma, the construction industry has remained primarily unaffected. This paper analyzes these three popular programs, the basis for their success and failures, and their documented level of susceptibility in the construction industry. These programs are then contrasted to the best value system, an owner-driven quality program that has been tested recently in the construction industry and documented to produce encouraging results. On the basis of the findings, it is proposed that most quality management programs are designed to be instigated by the vendor, by improving the company's ability to deliver a quantifiable, replicable product or service. This is significant because it indicates that although the underlying principles of the classic quality management programs are relevant to all markets, the processes and methods of application may be inappropriate for an industry that dispenses highly diverse or integrated products or services, such as construction.

AB - The drive to maintain competitiveness by increasing performance has been an ever-present goal of industries within the global market. Although many industries have benefited from classical quality management programs such as total quality management (TQM), lean production, and six sigma, the construction industry has remained primarily unaffected. This paper analyzes these three popular programs, the basis for their success and failures, and their documented level of susceptibility in the construction industry. These programs are then contrasted to the best value system, an owner-driven quality program that has been tested recently in the construction industry and documented to produce encouraging results. On the basis of the findings, it is proposed that most quality management programs are designed to be instigated by the vendor, by improving the company's ability to deliver a quantifiable, replicable product or service. This is significant because it indicates that although the underlying principles of the classic quality management programs are relevant to all markets, the processes and methods of application may be inappropriate for an industry that dispenses highly diverse or integrated products or services, such as construction.

KW - Best value

KW - Construction industry

KW - Lean

KW - Quality control

KW - Quality management

KW - Six sigma

KW - TQM

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=81855184564&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=81855184564&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000054

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000054

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:81855184564

VL - 27

SP - 210

EP - 219

JO - Journal of Management in Engineering - ASCE

JF - Journal of Management in Engineering - ASCE

SN - 0742-597X

IS - 4

ER -