Qualitative quality: Eight a"big-tent" criteria for excellent qualitative research

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1457 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article presents a model for quality in qualitative research that is uniquely expansive, yet flexible, in that it makes distinctions among qualitative research's means (methods and practices) and its ends. The article first provides a contextualization and rationale for the conceptualization. Then the author presents and explores eight key markers of quality in qualitative research including (a) worthy topic, (b) rich rigor, (c) sincerity, (d) credibility, (e) resonance, (f) significant contribution, (g) ethics, and (h) meaningful coherence. This eight-point conceptualization offers a useful pedagogical model and provides a common language of qualitative best practices that can be recognized as integral by a variety of audiences. While making a case for these markers of quality, the article leaves space for dialogue, imagination, growth, and improvisation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)837-851
Number of pages15
JournalQualitative Inquiry
Volume16
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2010

Keywords

  • credibility
  • criteria
  • ethics
  • evaluation
  • qualitative pedagogy
  • rigor

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anthropology
  • Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Qualitative quality: Eight a"big-tent" criteria for excellent qualitative research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this