Qualitative case studies in operations management: Trends, research outcomes, and future research implications

Mark Barratt, Thomas Choi, Mei Li

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

425 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Our study examines the state of qualitative case studies in operations management. Five main operations management journals are included for their impact on the field. They are in alphabetical order: Decision Sciences, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Journal of Operations Management, Management Science, and Production and Operations Management. The qualitative case studies chosen were published between 1992 and 2007. With an increasing trend toward using more qualitative case studies, there have been meaningful and significant contributions to the field of operations management, especially in the area of theory building. However, in many of the qualitative case studies we reviewed, sufficient details in research design, data collection, and data analysis were missing. For instance, there are studies that do not offer sampling logic or a description of the analysis through which research out-comes are drawn. Further, research protocols for doing inductive case studies are much better developed compared to the research protocols for doing deductive case studies. Consequently, there is a lack of consistency in the way the case method has been applied. As qualitative researchers, we offer suggestions on how we can improve on what we have done and elevate the level of rigor and consistency.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)329-342
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Operations Management
Volume29
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2011

Fingerprint

Management science
Outcomes research
Research trends
Operations management
Sampling
Production and operations management
Data collection
Research design
Case method
Theory building
Decision science
Operations and production management
Logic

Keywords

  • Case studies
  • Deductive
  • Inductive
  • Qualitative
  • Research methods
  • Testing
  • Theory
  • Theory building

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Qualitative case studies in operations management : Trends, research outcomes, and future research implications. / Barratt, Mark; Choi, Thomas; Li, Mei.

In: Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 29, No. 4, 05.2011, p. 329-342.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{052187ac135f46938edae903af05ecfa,
title = "Qualitative case studies in operations management: Trends, research outcomes, and future research implications",
abstract = "Our study examines the state of qualitative case studies in operations management. Five main operations management journals are included for their impact on the field. They are in alphabetical order: Decision Sciences, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Journal of Operations Management, Management Science, and Production and Operations Management. The qualitative case studies chosen were published between 1992 and 2007. With an increasing trend toward using more qualitative case studies, there have been meaningful and significant contributions to the field of operations management, especially in the area of theory building. However, in many of the qualitative case studies we reviewed, sufficient details in research design, data collection, and data analysis were missing. For instance, there are studies that do not offer sampling logic or a description of the analysis through which research out-comes are drawn. Further, research protocols for doing inductive case studies are much better developed compared to the research protocols for doing deductive case studies. Consequently, there is a lack of consistency in the way the case method has been applied. As qualitative researchers, we offer suggestions on how we can improve on what we have done and elevate the level of rigor and consistency.",
keywords = "Case studies, Deductive, Inductive, Qualitative, Research methods, Testing, Theory, Theory building",
author = "Mark Barratt and Thomas Choi and Mei Li",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.jom.2010.06.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "329--342",
journal = "Journal of Operations Management",
issn = "0272-6963",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Qualitative case studies in operations management

T2 - Trends, research outcomes, and future research implications

AU - Barratt, Mark

AU - Choi, Thomas

AU - Li, Mei

PY - 2011/5

Y1 - 2011/5

N2 - Our study examines the state of qualitative case studies in operations management. Five main operations management journals are included for their impact on the field. They are in alphabetical order: Decision Sciences, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Journal of Operations Management, Management Science, and Production and Operations Management. The qualitative case studies chosen were published between 1992 and 2007. With an increasing trend toward using more qualitative case studies, there have been meaningful and significant contributions to the field of operations management, especially in the area of theory building. However, in many of the qualitative case studies we reviewed, sufficient details in research design, data collection, and data analysis were missing. For instance, there are studies that do not offer sampling logic or a description of the analysis through which research out-comes are drawn. Further, research protocols for doing inductive case studies are much better developed compared to the research protocols for doing deductive case studies. Consequently, there is a lack of consistency in the way the case method has been applied. As qualitative researchers, we offer suggestions on how we can improve on what we have done and elevate the level of rigor and consistency.

AB - Our study examines the state of qualitative case studies in operations management. Five main operations management journals are included for their impact on the field. They are in alphabetical order: Decision Sciences, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Journal of Operations Management, Management Science, and Production and Operations Management. The qualitative case studies chosen were published between 1992 and 2007. With an increasing trend toward using more qualitative case studies, there have been meaningful and significant contributions to the field of operations management, especially in the area of theory building. However, in many of the qualitative case studies we reviewed, sufficient details in research design, data collection, and data analysis were missing. For instance, there are studies that do not offer sampling logic or a description of the analysis through which research out-comes are drawn. Further, research protocols for doing inductive case studies are much better developed compared to the research protocols for doing deductive case studies. Consequently, there is a lack of consistency in the way the case method has been applied. As qualitative researchers, we offer suggestions on how we can improve on what we have done and elevate the level of rigor and consistency.

KW - Case studies

KW - Deductive

KW - Inductive

KW - Qualitative

KW - Research methods

KW - Testing

KW - Theory

KW - Theory building

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952773294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952773294&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jom.2010.06.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jom.2010.06.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79952773294

VL - 29

SP - 329

EP - 342

JO - Journal of Operations Management

JF - Journal of Operations Management

SN - 0272-6963

IS - 4

ER -