Putting words in perspective

Anna M. Borghi, Arthur Glenberg, Michael P. Kaschak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

140 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this article, we explore the nature of the conceptual knowledge retrieved when people use words to think about objects. If conceptual knowledge is used to simulate and guide action in the world, then how one can interact with an object should be reflected in the speed of retrieval and the content that is retrieved. This prediction was tested in three experiments in which a part verification procedure was used. Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated that speed of part verification varied with the perspective imposed on the object by the language used to name the object (e.g., "You are driving a car" or "You are fueling a car"). In Experiment 3, parts were chosen so that actions directed toward them (on the real object) require movement upward (e.g., the roof of a car) or downward (e.g., the wheels of a car). Orthogonally, responding "yes" required an upward or a downward movement to a response button. Responding in a direction incompatible with the part's location (e.g., responding downward to verify that a car has a roof) was slow relative to responding in a direction compatible with the part's location. These results provide a strong link between concept knowledge and situated action.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)863-873
Number of pages11
JournalMemory and Cognition
Volume32
Issue number6
StatePublished - Sep 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Names
Language
Direction compound
Car
Experiment
Conceptual Knowledge
Prediction
Wheel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Cite this

Borghi, A. M., Glenberg, A., & Kaschak, M. P. (2004). Putting words in perspective. Memory and Cognition, 32(6), 863-873.

Putting words in perspective. / Borghi, Anna M.; Glenberg, Arthur; Kaschak, Michael P.

In: Memory and Cognition, Vol. 32, No. 6, 09.2004, p. 863-873.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Borghi, AM, Glenberg, A & Kaschak, MP 2004, 'Putting words in perspective', Memory and Cognition, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 863-873.
Borghi AM, Glenberg A, Kaschak MP. Putting words in perspective. Memory and Cognition. 2004 Sep;32(6):863-873.
Borghi, Anna M. ; Glenberg, Arthur ; Kaschak, Michael P. / Putting words in perspective. In: Memory and Cognition. 2004 ; Vol. 32, No. 6. pp. 863-873.
@article{22f33d87119946b193e30fef657b271b,
title = "Putting words in perspective",
abstract = "In this article, we explore the nature of the conceptual knowledge retrieved when people use words to think about objects. If conceptual knowledge is used to simulate and guide action in the world, then how one can interact with an object should be reflected in the speed of retrieval and the content that is retrieved. This prediction was tested in three experiments in which a part verification procedure was used. Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated that speed of part verification varied with the perspective imposed on the object by the language used to name the object (e.g., {"}You are driving a car{"} or {"}You are fueling a car{"}). In Experiment 3, parts were chosen so that actions directed toward them (on the real object) require movement upward (e.g., the roof of a car) or downward (e.g., the wheels of a car). Orthogonally, responding {"}yes{"} required an upward or a downward movement to a response button. Responding in a direction incompatible with the part's location (e.g., responding downward to verify that a car has a roof) was slow relative to responding in a direction compatible with the part's location. These results provide a strong link between concept knowledge and situated action.",
author = "Borghi, {Anna M.} and Arthur Glenberg and Kaschak, {Michael P.}",
year = "2004",
month = "9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "863--873",
journal = "Memory and Cognition",
issn = "0090-502X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Putting words in perspective

AU - Borghi, Anna M.

AU - Glenberg, Arthur

AU - Kaschak, Michael P.

PY - 2004/9

Y1 - 2004/9

N2 - In this article, we explore the nature of the conceptual knowledge retrieved when people use words to think about objects. If conceptual knowledge is used to simulate and guide action in the world, then how one can interact with an object should be reflected in the speed of retrieval and the content that is retrieved. This prediction was tested in three experiments in which a part verification procedure was used. Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated that speed of part verification varied with the perspective imposed on the object by the language used to name the object (e.g., "You are driving a car" or "You are fueling a car"). In Experiment 3, parts were chosen so that actions directed toward them (on the real object) require movement upward (e.g., the roof of a car) or downward (e.g., the wheels of a car). Orthogonally, responding "yes" required an upward or a downward movement to a response button. Responding in a direction incompatible with the part's location (e.g., responding downward to verify that a car has a roof) was slow relative to responding in a direction compatible with the part's location. These results provide a strong link between concept knowledge and situated action.

AB - In this article, we explore the nature of the conceptual knowledge retrieved when people use words to think about objects. If conceptual knowledge is used to simulate and guide action in the world, then how one can interact with an object should be reflected in the speed of retrieval and the content that is retrieved. This prediction was tested in three experiments in which a part verification procedure was used. Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrated that speed of part verification varied with the perspective imposed on the object by the language used to name the object (e.g., "You are driving a car" or "You are fueling a car"). In Experiment 3, parts were chosen so that actions directed toward them (on the real object) require movement upward (e.g., the roof of a car) or downward (e.g., the wheels of a car). Orthogonally, responding "yes" required an upward or a downward movement to a response button. Responding in a direction incompatible with the part's location (e.g., responding downward to verify that a car has a roof) was slow relative to responding in a direction compatible with the part's location. These results provide a strong link between concept knowledge and situated action.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=11144296347&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=11144296347&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 15673175

AN - SCOPUS:11144296347

VL - 32

SP - 863

EP - 873

JO - Memory and Cognition

JF - Memory and Cognition

SN - 0090-502X

IS - 6

ER -