Purchasing-logistics integration and supplier performance

An information-processing view

Bryan Ashenbaum, Arnold Maltz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to develop a purchasing-logistics integration (PLI) conceptualization along two dimensions: mutual responsibility and integrative efforts. This conceptualization is then tested as to whether it provides any insights for supplier performance. Design/methodology/approach - Information-Processing Theory is used to posit hypotheses linking the dimensions of PLI with various measures of supplier performance. Hypotheses are then tested with a dyadic data set of purchasing and logistics managers, using multiple regression methods. Findings - Purchasing managers found mutual responsibility to positively influence supplier delivery speed, whereas logistics managers found it to positively influence supplier price performance. Generally speaking, purchasing managers perceived a stronger linkage between formal integrative efforts (liaison roles and joint reward systems) and supplier performance, whereas logistics managers perceived this linkage to be stronger for informal integrative efforts such as information exchange and collaboration. Research limitations/implications - Study results are cross-sectional in nature and consist of three major industry groupings. The dyadic data were analyzed separately to avoid significant data loss. Practical implications - Supply chain managers will find the areas where purchasing and logistics managers overlap in their perceptions (as well as where they differ) useful. In addition, an understanding of how PLI influences supplier performance should help improve organizational effectiveness. Originality/value - PLI is a highly important, yet understudied, internal connection. This study provides a useful framework in helping academics and practitioners better understand this crucial internal connection, and how it relates to the performance extracted from suppliers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)379-397
Number of pages19
JournalInternational Journal of Logistics Management
Volume28
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2017

Fingerprint

Purchasing
information processing
supplier
Logistics
logistics
Managers
manager
performance
responsibility
Information processing
Supplier performance
information exchange
grouping
Supply chains
reward
supply
regression
industry
methodology
Suppliers

Keywords

  • Collaboration
  • Integration
  • Logistics
  • Purchasing
  • Supplier performance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Transportation

Cite this

Purchasing-logistics integration and supplier performance : An information-processing view. / Ashenbaum, Bryan; Maltz, Arnold.

In: International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2017, p. 379-397.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a0adf20edfc244a2b8c750543045e44f,
title = "Purchasing-logistics integration and supplier performance: An information-processing view",
abstract = "Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to develop a purchasing-logistics integration (PLI) conceptualization along two dimensions: mutual responsibility and integrative efforts. This conceptualization is then tested as to whether it provides any insights for supplier performance. Design/methodology/approach - Information-Processing Theory is used to posit hypotheses linking the dimensions of PLI with various measures of supplier performance. Hypotheses are then tested with a dyadic data set of purchasing and logistics managers, using multiple regression methods. Findings - Purchasing managers found mutual responsibility to positively influence supplier delivery speed, whereas logistics managers found it to positively influence supplier price performance. Generally speaking, purchasing managers perceived a stronger linkage between formal integrative efforts (liaison roles and joint reward systems) and supplier performance, whereas logistics managers perceived this linkage to be stronger for informal integrative efforts such as information exchange and collaboration. Research limitations/implications - Study results are cross-sectional in nature and consist of three major industry groupings. The dyadic data were analyzed separately to avoid significant data loss. Practical implications - Supply chain managers will find the areas where purchasing and logistics managers overlap in their perceptions (as well as where they differ) useful. In addition, an understanding of how PLI influences supplier performance should help improve organizational effectiveness. Originality/value - PLI is a highly important, yet understudied, internal connection. This study provides a useful framework in helping academics and practitioners better understand this crucial internal connection, and how it relates to the performance extracted from suppliers.",
keywords = "Collaboration, Integration, Logistics, Purchasing, Supplier performance",
author = "Bryan Ashenbaum and Arnold Maltz",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1108/IJLM-07-2014-0113",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "28",
pages = "379--397",
journal = "International Journal of Logistics Management",
issn = "0957-4093",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Purchasing-logistics integration and supplier performance

T2 - An information-processing view

AU - Ashenbaum, Bryan

AU - Maltz, Arnold

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to develop a purchasing-logistics integration (PLI) conceptualization along two dimensions: mutual responsibility and integrative efforts. This conceptualization is then tested as to whether it provides any insights for supplier performance. Design/methodology/approach - Information-Processing Theory is used to posit hypotheses linking the dimensions of PLI with various measures of supplier performance. Hypotheses are then tested with a dyadic data set of purchasing and logistics managers, using multiple regression methods. Findings - Purchasing managers found mutual responsibility to positively influence supplier delivery speed, whereas logistics managers found it to positively influence supplier price performance. Generally speaking, purchasing managers perceived a stronger linkage between formal integrative efforts (liaison roles and joint reward systems) and supplier performance, whereas logistics managers perceived this linkage to be stronger for informal integrative efforts such as information exchange and collaboration. Research limitations/implications - Study results are cross-sectional in nature and consist of three major industry groupings. The dyadic data were analyzed separately to avoid significant data loss. Practical implications - Supply chain managers will find the areas where purchasing and logistics managers overlap in their perceptions (as well as where they differ) useful. In addition, an understanding of how PLI influences supplier performance should help improve organizational effectiveness. Originality/value - PLI is a highly important, yet understudied, internal connection. This study provides a useful framework in helping academics and practitioners better understand this crucial internal connection, and how it relates to the performance extracted from suppliers.

AB - Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to develop a purchasing-logistics integration (PLI) conceptualization along two dimensions: mutual responsibility and integrative efforts. This conceptualization is then tested as to whether it provides any insights for supplier performance. Design/methodology/approach - Information-Processing Theory is used to posit hypotheses linking the dimensions of PLI with various measures of supplier performance. Hypotheses are then tested with a dyadic data set of purchasing and logistics managers, using multiple regression methods. Findings - Purchasing managers found mutual responsibility to positively influence supplier delivery speed, whereas logistics managers found it to positively influence supplier price performance. Generally speaking, purchasing managers perceived a stronger linkage between formal integrative efforts (liaison roles and joint reward systems) and supplier performance, whereas logistics managers perceived this linkage to be stronger for informal integrative efforts such as information exchange and collaboration. Research limitations/implications - Study results are cross-sectional in nature and consist of three major industry groupings. The dyadic data were analyzed separately to avoid significant data loss. Practical implications - Supply chain managers will find the areas where purchasing and logistics managers overlap in their perceptions (as well as where they differ) useful. In addition, an understanding of how PLI influences supplier performance should help improve organizational effectiveness. Originality/value - PLI is a highly important, yet understudied, internal connection. This study provides a useful framework in helping academics and practitioners better understand this crucial internal connection, and how it relates to the performance extracted from suppliers.

KW - Collaboration

KW - Integration

KW - Logistics

KW - Purchasing

KW - Supplier performance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019035333&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019035333&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/IJLM-07-2014-0113

DO - 10.1108/IJLM-07-2014-0113

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 379

EP - 397

JO - International Journal of Logistics Management

JF - International Journal of Logistics Management

SN - 0957-4093

IS - 2

ER -