68 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Domestic science policy in the United States is linked inextricably to economic thinking. We seek to develop a practical analytical framework that confronts the manifest problems of economic valuing for science and technology activities. We argue that pervasive use of market valuation, market-failure assumptions and economic metaphors shapes the structure of science policy in undesirable ways. In particular, reliance on economic reasoning tends to shift the discourse about science policy away from political questions of "why?" and "to what end?" to economic questions of "how much?" Borrowing from the "public values failure framework", we examine public values criteria for science policy, illustrated with case vignettes on such topics as genetically modified crops and the market for human organs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)119-136
Number of pages18
JournalScience and Public Policy
Volume32
Issue number2
StatePublished - Apr 2005

Fingerprint

science policy
economics
Values
market
market failure
analytical framework
science and technology
valuation
metaphor
public
policy
science
crop
discourse

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development

Cite this

Public values and public failure in US science policy. / Bozeman, Barry; Sarewitz, Daniel.

In: Science and Public Policy, Vol. 32, No. 2, 04.2005, p. 119-136.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b585e424278f432c98fab9f2f689c766,
title = "Public values and public failure in US science policy",
abstract = "Domestic science policy in the United States is linked inextricably to economic thinking. We seek to develop a practical analytical framework that confronts the manifest problems of economic valuing for science and technology activities. We argue that pervasive use of market valuation, market-failure assumptions and economic metaphors shapes the structure of science policy in undesirable ways. In particular, reliance on economic reasoning tends to shift the discourse about science policy away from political questions of {"}why?{"} and {"}to what end?{"} to economic questions of {"}how much?{"} Borrowing from the {"}public values failure framework{"}, we examine public values criteria for science policy, illustrated with case vignettes on such topics as genetically modified crops and the market for human organs.",
author = "Barry Bozeman and Daniel Sarewitz",
year = "2005",
month = "4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "119--136",
journal = "Science and Public Policy",
issn = "0302-3427",
publisher = "Beech Tree Publishing",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public values and public failure in US science policy

AU - Bozeman, Barry

AU - Sarewitz, Daniel

PY - 2005/4

Y1 - 2005/4

N2 - Domestic science policy in the United States is linked inextricably to economic thinking. We seek to develop a practical analytical framework that confronts the manifest problems of economic valuing for science and technology activities. We argue that pervasive use of market valuation, market-failure assumptions and economic metaphors shapes the structure of science policy in undesirable ways. In particular, reliance on economic reasoning tends to shift the discourse about science policy away from political questions of "why?" and "to what end?" to economic questions of "how much?" Borrowing from the "public values failure framework", we examine public values criteria for science policy, illustrated with case vignettes on such topics as genetically modified crops and the market for human organs.

AB - Domestic science policy in the United States is linked inextricably to economic thinking. We seek to develop a practical analytical framework that confronts the manifest problems of economic valuing for science and technology activities. We argue that pervasive use of market valuation, market-failure assumptions and economic metaphors shapes the structure of science policy in undesirable ways. In particular, reliance on economic reasoning tends to shift the discourse about science policy away from political questions of "why?" and "to what end?" to economic questions of "how much?" Borrowing from the "public values failure framework", we examine public values criteria for science policy, illustrated with case vignettes on such topics as genetically modified crops and the market for human organs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=18944383046&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=18944383046&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:18944383046

VL - 32

SP - 119

EP - 136

JO - Science and Public Policy

JF - Science and Public Policy

SN - 0302-3427

IS - 2

ER -