Public sector reform and governance for adaptation

Implications of new public management for adaptive capacity in Mexico and Norway

Hallie Eakin, Siri Eriksen, Per Ove Eikeland, Cecilie Øyen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

41 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although many governments are assuming the responsibility of initiating adaptation policy in relation to climate change, the compatibility of "governance-for-adaptation" with the current paradigms of public administration has generally been overlooked. Over the last several decades, countries around the globe have embraced variants of the philosophy of administration broadly called "New Public Management" (NPM) in an effort to improve administrative efficiencies and the provision of public services. Using evidence from a case study of reforms in the building sector in Norway, and a case study of water and flood risk management in central Mexico, we analyze the implications of the adoption of the tenets of NPM for adaptive capacity. Our cases illustrate that some of the key attributes associated with governance for adaptation-namely, technical and financial capacities; institutional memory, learning and knowledge; and participation and accountability-have been eroded by NPM reforms. Despite improvements in specific operational tasks of the public sector in each case, we show that the success of NPM reforms presumes the existence of core elements of governance that have often been found lacking, including solid institutional frameworks and accountability. Our analysis illustrates the importance of considering both longer-term adaptive capacities and short-term efficiency goals in public sector administration reform.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)338-351
Number of pages14
JournalEnvironmental Management
Volume47
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2011

Fingerprint

public sector
Public administration
accountability
public administration
institutional framework
public service
Risk management
Climate change
learning
climate change
public
Data storage equipment
Water
water

Keywords

  • Adaptive capacity
  • Climate change adaptation
  • Europe
  • Governance
  • Latin America
  • New Public Management
  • Public policy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Pollution

Cite this

Public sector reform and governance for adaptation : Implications of new public management for adaptive capacity in Mexico and Norway. / Eakin, Hallie; Eriksen, Siri; Eikeland, Per Ove; Øyen, Cecilie.

In: Environmental Management, Vol. 47, No. 3, 03.2011, p. 338-351.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{dd47d8068d904dc58cfb9040f7de34d2,
title = "Public sector reform and governance for adaptation: Implications of new public management for adaptive capacity in Mexico and Norway",
abstract = "Although many governments are assuming the responsibility of initiating adaptation policy in relation to climate change, the compatibility of {"}governance-for-adaptation{"} with the current paradigms of public administration has generally been overlooked. Over the last several decades, countries around the globe have embraced variants of the philosophy of administration broadly called {"}New Public Management{"} (NPM) in an effort to improve administrative efficiencies and the provision of public services. Using evidence from a case study of reforms in the building sector in Norway, and a case study of water and flood risk management in central Mexico, we analyze the implications of the adoption of the tenets of NPM for adaptive capacity. Our cases illustrate that some of the key attributes associated with governance for adaptation-namely, technical and financial capacities; institutional memory, learning and knowledge; and participation and accountability-have been eroded by NPM reforms. Despite improvements in specific operational tasks of the public sector in each case, we show that the success of NPM reforms presumes the existence of core elements of governance that have often been found lacking, including solid institutional frameworks and accountability. Our analysis illustrates the importance of considering both longer-term adaptive capacities and short-term efficiency goals in public sector administration reform.",
keywords = "Adaptive capacity, Climate change adaptation, Europe, Governance, Latin America, New Public Management, Public policy",
author = "Hallie Eakin and Siri Eriksen and Eikeland, {Per Ove} and Cecilie {\O}yen",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1007/s00267-010-9605-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "338--351",
journal = "Environmental Management",
issn = "0364-152X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public sector reform and governance for adaptation

T2 - Implications of new public management for adaptive capacity in Mexico and Norway

AU - Eakin, Hallie

AU - Eriksen, Siri

AU - Eikeland, Per Ove

AU - Øyen, Cecilie

PY - 2011/3

Y1 - 2011/3

N2 - Although many governments are assuming the responsibility of initiating adaptation policy in relation to climate change, the compatibility of "governance-for-adaptation" with the current paradigms of public administration has generally been overlooked. Over the last several decades, countries around the globe have embraced variants of the philosophy of administration broadly called "New Public Management" (NPM) in an effort to improve administrative efficiencies and the provision of public services. Using evidence from a case study of reforms in the building sector in Norway, and a case study of water and flood risk management in central Mexico, we analyze the implications of the adoption of the tenets of NPM for adaptive capacity. Our cases illustrate that some of the key attributes associated with governance for adaptation-namely, technical and financial capacities; institutional memory, learning and knowledge; and participation and accountability-have been eroded by NPM reforms. Despite improvements in specific operational tasks of the public sector in each case, we show that the success of NPM reforms presumes the existence of core elements of governance that have often been found lacking, including solid institutional frameworks and accountability. Our analysis illustrates the importance of considering both longer-term adaptive capacities and short-term efficiency goals in public sector administration reform.

AB - Although many governments are assuming the responsibility of initiating adaptation policy in relation to climate change, the compatibility of "governance-for-adaptation" with the current paradigms of public administration has generally been overlooked. Over the last several decades, countries around the globe have embraced variants of the philosophy of administration broadly called "New Public Management" (NPM) in an effort to improve administrative efficiencies and the provision of public services. Using evidence from a case study of reforms in the building sector in Norway, and a case study of water and flood risk management in central Mexico, we analyze the implications of the adoption of the tenets of NPM for adaptive capacity. Our cases illustrate that some of the key attributes associated with governance for adaptation-namely, technical and financial capacities; institutional memory, learning and knowledge; and participation and accountability-have been eroded by NPM reforms. Despite improvements in specific operational tasks of the public sector in each case, we show that the success of NPM reforms presumes the existence of core elements of governance that have often been found lacking, including solid institutional frameworks and accountability. Our analysis illustrates the importance of considering both longer-term adaptive capacities and short-term efficiency goals in public sector administration reform.

KW - Adaptive capacity

KW - Climate change adaptation

KW - Europe

KW - Governance

KW - Latin America

KW - New Public Management

KW - Public policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79954447871&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79954447871&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00267-010-9605-0

DO - 10.1007/s00267-010-9605-0

M3 - Article

VL - 47

SP - 338

EP - 351

JO - Environmental Management

JF - Environmental Management

SN - 0364-152X

IS - 3

ER -