Public, Private and Hybrid Organizations: An Empirical Examination of the Role of Publicness

Mark A. Emmert, Michael Crow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article provides an empirical examination of the role of publicness in explaining organization-level phenomena. Analysis of data from 250 public, private and mixed, or hybrid, R&D laboratories indicates that there are clear distinctions between organizations based on sector affiliation. These differences center around levels of administrative intensity, funding patterns and complexity, governmental influences on goals, and the nature of the products produced by the laboratories. A dimensional approach, grounded in political economy-based organization theory, is applied in the analysis. Findings indicate that such approaches help explain publicness through the identification of specific, empirically identifiable dimensions of publicness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)216-244
Number of pages29
JournalAdministration and Society
Volume20
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1988
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

organization theory
examination
political economy
funding
organization
Hybrid organizations
Public-private
Funding
Political economy
Organization theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Marketing
  • Public Administration

Cite this

Public, Private and Hybrid Organizations : An Empirical Examination of the Role of Publicness. / Emmert, Mark A.; Crow, Michael.

In: Administration and Society, Vol. 20, No. 2, 1988, p. 216-244.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3cde616d8e1a416d9e4fbc88a356fe8c,
title = "Public, Private and Hybrid Organizations: An Empirical Examination of the Role of Publicness",
abstract = "This article provides an empirical examination of the role of publicness in explaining organization-level phenomena. Analysis of data from 250 public, private and mixed, or hybrid, R&D laboratories indicates that there are clear distinctions between organizations based on sector affiliation. These differences center around levels of administrative intensity, funding patterns and complexity, governmental influences on goals, and the nature of the products produced by the laboratories. A dimensional approach, grounded in political economy-based organization theory, is applied in the analysis. Findings indicate that such approaches help explain publicness through the identification of specific, empirically identifiable dimensions of publicness.",
author = "Emmert, {Mark A.} and Michael Crow",
year = "1988",
doi = "10.1177/009539978802000205",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "216--244",
journal = "Administration and Society",
issn = "0095-3997",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public, Private and Hybrid Organizations

T2 - An Empirical Examination of the Role of Publicness

AU - Emmert, Mark A.

AU - Crow, Michael

PY - 1988

Y1 - 1988

N2 - This article provides an empirical examination of the role of publicness in explaining organization-level phenomena. Analysis of data from 250 public, private and mixed, or hybrid, R&D laboratories indicates that there are clear distinctions between organizations based on sector affiliation. These differences center around levels of administrative intensity, funding patterns and complexity, governmental influences on goals, and the nature of the products produced by the laboratories. A dimensional approach, grounded in political economy-based organization theory, is applied in the analysis. Findings indicate that such approaches help explain publicness through the identification of specific, empirically identifiable dimensions of publicness.

AB - This article provides an empirical examination of the role of publicness in explaining organization-level phenomena. Analysis of data from 250 public, private and mixed, or hybrid, R&D laboratories indicates that there are clear distinctions between organizations based on sector affiliation. These differences center around levels of administrative intensity, funding patterns and complexity, governmental influences on goals, and the nature of the products produced by the laboratories. A dimensional approach, grounded in political economy-based organization theory, is applied in the analysis. Findings indicate that such approaches help explain publicness through the identification of specific, empirically identifiable dimensions of publicness.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84965904275&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84965904275&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/009539978802000205

DO - 10.1177/009539978802000205

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84965904275

VL - 20

SP - 216

EP - 244

JO - Administration and Society

JF - Administration and Society

SN - 0095-3997

IS - 2

ER -