TY - JOUR
T1 - Public Perception of Climate Change. Voluntary Mitigation and Barriers to Behavior Change
AU - Semenza, Jan C.
AU - Hall, David E.
AU - Wilson, Daniel J.
AU - Bontempo, Brian D.
AU - Sailor, David J.
AU - George, Linda A.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Amber Johnson, Debi Elliott, and the survey team from the Survey Research Laboratory at Portland State University for their diligent work on this project. We are also grateful for insightful feedback on the manuscript we have obtained from the CDC Climate Change Workgroup and from four anonymous reviewers. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0410103. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
PY - 2008/11
Y1 - 2008/11
N2 - Mitigating global climate change requires not only government action but also cooperation from consumers. Population-based, cross-sectional surveys were conducted among 1202 respondents in Portland OR and Houston TX between June and September 2007 regarding awareness, concern, and behavior change related to climate change. The data were subjected to both quantitative and qualitative analyses. Awareness about climate change is virtually universal (98% in Portland and 92% in Houston) with the vast majority reporting some level of concern (90% in Portland and 82% in Houston). A multivariate analysis revealed significant predictors of behavior change: individuals with heightened concern about climate change (p<0.001); respondents with higher level of education (p= 0.03); younger compared with older individuals (p<0.001); and Portlanders more likely to change behavior compared with Houstonians (p<0.001). Of those who changed behavior, 43% reported having reduced their energy usage at home, 39% had reduced gasoline consumption, and 26% engaged in other behaviors, largely recycling. Qualitative data indicate a number of cognitive, behavioral, and structural obstacles to voluntary mitigation. Although consumers are interested in global climate change-mitigation strategies and willing to act accordingly, considerable impediments remain. Government policy must eliminate economic, structural, and social barriers to change and advance accessible and economical alternatives. Individual-level mitigation can be a policy option under favorable contextual conditions, as these results indicate, but must be accompanied by mitigation efforts from industry, commerce, and government.
AB - Mitigating global climate change requires not only government action but also cooperation from consumers. Population-based, cross-sectional surveys were conducted among 1202 respondents in Portland OR and Houston TX between June and September 2007 regarding awareness, concern, and behavior change related to climate change. The data were subjected to both quantitative and qualitative analyses. Awareness about climate change is virtually universal (98% in Portland and 92% in Houston) with the vast majority reporting some level of concern (90% in Portland and 82% in Houston). A multivariate analysis revealed significant predictors of behavior change: individuals with heightened concern about climate change (p<0.001); respondents with higher level of education (p= 0.03); younger compared with older individuals (p<0.001); and Portlanders more likely to change behavior compared with Houstonians (p<0.001). Of those who changed behavior, 43% reported having reduced their energy usage at home, 39% had reduced gasoline consumption, and 26% engaged in other behaviors, largely recycling. Qualitative data indicate a number of cognitive, behavioral, and structural obstacles to voluntary mitigation. Although consumers are interested in global climate change-mitigation strategies and willing to act accordingly, considerable impediments remain. Government policy must eliminate economic, structural, and social barriers to change and advance accessible and economical alternatives. Individual-level mitigation can be a policy option under favorable contextual conditions, as these results indicate, but must be accompanied by mitigation efforts from industry, commerce, and government.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=53249092013&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=53249092013&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.08.020
DO - 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.08.020
M3 - Review article
C2 - 18929974
AN - SCOPUS:53249092013
SN - 0749-3797
VL - 35
SP - 479
EP - 487
JO - American journal of preventive medicine
JF - American journal of preventive medicine
IS - 5
ER -