Public management mentoring: What affects outcomes?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Few research studies focus on public managers' mentoring, and few mentoring studies include any outcome measure other than reported satisfaction. Our study examines diverse outcomes for a broad-based set of public managers, including not only satisfaction but also the number of employees supervised in the current job, whether the most recent job was a promotion, and whether the protégé is now a mentor. We argue that these may be particularly important outcomes in the public sector due to the common basis of promotion in numbers supervised and due to the special need to develop protégés into mentors. Our findings show that mentoring outcomes are predicted by attributes of the protégé, the mentor, and the mentoring relationship and by the degree and type of social capital focus of the mentoring.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)427-452
Number of pages26
JournalJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory
Volume19
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

public management
mentoring
promotion
manager
social capital
public sector
employee
Mentoring
Public management
Mentor
Managers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Marketing

Cite this

Public management mentoring : What affects outcomes? / Bozeman, Barry; Feeney, Mary.

In: Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 19, No. 2, 04.2009, p. 427-452.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e96dfd657e92425bbcb87adf28f5b6c0,
title = "Public management mentoring: What affects outcomes?",
abstract = "Few research studies focus on public managers' mentoring, and few mentoring studies include any outcome measure other than reported satisfaction. Our study examines diverse outcomes for a broad-based set of public managers, including not only satisfaction but also the number of employees supervised in the current job, whether the most recent job was a promotion, and whether the prot{\'e}g{\'e} is now a mentor. We argue that these may be particularly important outcomes in the public sector due to the common basis of promotion in numbers supervised and due to the special need to develop prot{\'e}g{\'e}s into mentors. Our findings show that mentoring outcomes are predicted by attributes of the prot{\'e}g{\'e}, the mentor, and the mentoring relationship and by the degree and type of social capital focus of the mentoring.",
author = "Barry Bozeman and Mary Feeney",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1093/jopart/mun007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "19",
pages = "427--452",
journal = "Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory",
issn = "1053-1858",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Public management mentoring

T2 - What affects outcomes?

AU - Bozeman, Barry

AU - Feeney, Mary

PY - 2009/4

Y1 - 2009/4

N2 - Few research studies focus on public managers' mentoring, and few mentoring studies include any outcome measure other than reported satisfaction. Our study examines diverse outcomes for a broad-based set of public managers, including not only satisfaction but also the number of employees supervised in the current job, whether the most recent job was a promotion, and whether the protégé is now a mentor. We argue that these may be particularly important outcomes in the public sector due to the common basis of promotion in numbers supervised and due to the special need to develop protégés into mentors. Our findings show that mentoring outcomes are predicted by attributes of the protégé, the mentor, and the mentoring relationship and by the degree and type of social capital focus of the mentoring.

AB - Few research studies focus on public managers' mentoring, and few mentoring studies include any outcome measure other than reported satisfaction. Our study examines diverse outcomes for a broad-based set of public managers, including not only satisfaction but also the number of employees supervised in the current job, whether the most recent job was a promotion, and whether the protégé is now a mentor. We argue that these may be particularly important outcomes in the public sector due to the common basis of promotion in numbers supervised and due to the special need to develop protégés into mentors. Our findings show that mentoring outcomes are predicted by attributes of the protégé, the mentor, and the mentoring relationship and by the degree and type of social capital focus of the mentoring.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65249121300&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=65249121300&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/jopart/mun007

DO - 10.1093/jopart/mun007

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:65249121300

VL - 19

SP - 427

EP - 452

JO - Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

JF - Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

SN - 1053-1858

IS - 2

ER -