Public intuitions about fair child support allocations

Converging evidence for a "fair shares" rule

Sanford L. Braver, Ira Mark Ellman, Robert J. MacCoun

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    2 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Nearly all American states use one of two systems for setting the amount of child support that noncustodial parents (NCPs) are required to pay to custodial parents (CPs). In previous work, we found that lay judgments of the child support amount the law should require differ in meaningful ways from these two systems: Our respondents favored child support amounts that are more responsive to the NCP's income and much more responsive to the CP's income than set by either system. They also favored dollar amounts that increase more rapidly with NCP income when CP income is lower, producing a characteristic fanning lines pattern when dollar support amounts are charted against NCP income for several different CP incomes. We give the label "Fair Shares" to these two features of our respondents' child support judgments. We describe six new experimental studies that vary the context of these judgments in ways that test whether the "Fair Shares" account is robust. Our studies consistently replicate the fan-shaped pattern and shed further light on lay judgments.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)146-163
    Number of pages18
    JournalPsychology, Public Policy, and Law
    Volume20
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - May 1 2014

    Fingerprint

    Intuition
    intuition
    custodial parent
    Parents
    income
    parents
    evidence
    dollar
    fan
    low income
    Law

    Keywords

    • Child support
    • Divorce
    • Fairness intuitions
    • Family law

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Social Psychology
    • Sociology and Political Science
    • Law

    Cite this

    Public intuitions about fair child support allocations : Converging evidence for a "fair shares" rule. / Braver, Sanford L.; Ellman, Ira Mark; MacCoun, Robert J.

    In: Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, Vol. 20, No. 2, 01.05.2014, p. 146-163.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Braver, Sanford L. ; Ellman, Ira Mark ; MacCoun, Robert J. / Public intuitions about fair child support allocations : Converging evidence for a "fair shares" rule. In: Psychology, Public Policy, and Law. 2014 ; Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 146-163.
    @article{422ad91daa634bc08e8988962befce63,
    title = "Public intuitions about fair child support allocations: Converging evidence for a {"}fair shares{"} rule",
    abstract = "Nearly all American states use one of two systems for setting the amount of child support that noncustodial parents (NCPs) are required to pay to custodial parents (CPs). In previous work, we found that lay judgments of the child support amount the law should require differ in meaningful ways from these two systems: Our respondents favored child support amounts that are more responsive to the NCP's income and much more responsive to the CP's income than set by either system. They also favored dollar amounts that increase more rapidly with NCP income when CP income is lower, producing a characteristic fanning lines pattern when dollar support amounts are charted against NCP income for several different CP incomes. We give the label {"}Fair Shares{"} to these two features of our respondents' child support judgments. We describe six new experimental studies that vary the context of these judgments in ways that test whether the {"}Fair Shares{"} account is robust. Our studies consistently replicate the fan-shaped pattern and shed further light on lay judgments.",
    keywords = "Child support, Divorce, Fairness intuitions, Family law",
    author = "Braver, {Sanford L.} and Ellman, {Ira Mark} and MacCoun, {Robert J.}",
    year = "2014",
    month = "5",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.1037/law0000003",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "20",
    pages = "146--163",
    journal = "Psychology, Public Policy, and Law",
    issn = "1076-8971",
    publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
    number = "2",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Public intuitions about fair child support allocations

    T2 - Converging evidence for a "fair shares" rule

    AU - Braver, Sanford L.

    AU - Ellman, Ira Mark

    AU - MacCoun, Robert J.

    PY - 2014/5/1

    Y1 - 2014/5/1

    N2 - Nearly all American states use one of two systems for setting the amount of child support that noncustodial parents (NCPs) are required to pay to custodial parents (CPs). In previous work, we found that lay judgments of the child support amount the law should require differ in meaningful ways from these two systems: Our respondents favored child support amounts that are more responsive to the NCP's income and much more responsive to the CP's income than set by either system. They also favored dollar amounts that increase more rapidly with NCP income when CP income is lower, producing a characteristic fanning lines pattern when dollar support amounts are charted against NCP income for several different CP incomes. We give the label "Fair Shares" to these two features of our respondents' child support judgments. We describe six new experimental studies that vary the context of these judgments in ways that test whether the "Fair Shares" account is robust. Our studies consistently replicate the fan-shaped pattern and shed further light on lay judgments.

    AB - Nearly all American states use one of two systems for setting the amount of child support that noncustodial parents (NCPs) are required to pay to custodial parents (CPs). In previous work, we found that lay judgments of the child support amount the law should require differ in meaningful ways from these two systems: Our respondents favored child support amounts that are more responsive to the NCP's income and much more responsive to the CP's income than set by either system. They also favored dollar amounts that increase more rapidly with NCP income when CP income is lower, producing a characteristic fanning lines pattern when dollar support amounts are charted against NCP income for several different CP incomes. We give the label "Fair Shares" to these two features of our respondents' child support judgments. We describe six new experimental studies that vary the context of these judgments in ways that test whether the "Fair Shares" account is robust. Our studies consistently replicate the fan-shaped pattern and shed further light on lay judgments.

    KW - Child support

    KW - Divorce

    KW - Fairness intuitions

    KW - Family law

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84937732748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84937732748&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1037/law0000003

    DO - 10.1037/law0000003

    M3 - Article

    VL - 20

    SP - 146

    EP - 163

    JO - Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

    JF - Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

    SN - 1076-8971

    IS - 2

    ER -