Psychophysical test for the independence of perception and action

Eric Amazeen, Flavio Dasilva

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

Research has suggested that perception and action are independent (see M. A. Goodale & A. Haffenden, 1998). The authors used the Ebbinghaus illusion to test this hypothesis in 2 experiments. Verbal reports of perceived size were compared with maximum grip aperture during grasping (Experiment 1) and manual reports of perceived size (Experiment 2). A multidimensional signal detection analysis was used to distinguish among the possible interactions between the two processes in each experiment (H. Kadlec & J. T. Townsend, 1992a, 1992b). In Experiment 1, the percepts were independent, and there were no interactions between processes for verbal and visuomotor responses. In Experiment 2, the percepts associated with verbal and manual reports were independent, but the processes interacted at the levels of the stimulus information and the decision rules used to transform each percept into a response.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)170-182
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Volume31
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2005

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Psychophysical test for the independence of perception and action'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this