Psychophysical evaluation of haptic perception under augmentation by a handheld device

Bing Wu, Roberta Klatzky, Randy Lee, Vikas Shivaprabhu, John Galeotti, Mel Siegel, Joel S. Schuman, Ralph Hollis, George Stetten

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Objective: This study investigated the effectiveness of force augmentation in haptic perception tasks. Background: Considerable engineering effort has been devoted to developing force augmented reality (AR) systems to assist users in delicate procedures like microsurgery. In contrast, far less has been done to characterize the behavioral outcomes of these systems, and no research has systematically examined the impact of sensory and perceptual processes on force augmentation effectiveness. Method: Using a handheld force magnifier as an exemplar haptic AR, we conducted three experiments to characterize its utility in the perception of force and stiffness. Experiments 1 and 2 measured, respectively, the users ability to detect and differentiate weak force (<0.5 N) with or without the assistance of the device and compared it to direct perception. Experiment 3 examined the perception of stiffness through the force augmentation. Results: The users ability to detect and differentiate small forces was significantly improved by augmentation at both threshold and suprathreshold levels. The augmentation also enhanced stiffness perception. However, although perception of augmented forces matches that of the physical equivalent for weak forces, it falls off with increasing intensity. Conclusion: The loss in the effectiveness reflects the nature of sensory and perceptual processing. Such perceptual limitations should be taken into consideration in the design and development of haptic AR systems to maximize utility. Application: The findings provide useful information for building effective haptic AR systems, particularly for use in microsurgery.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)523-537
    Number of pages15
    JournalHuman Factors
    Volume57
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - May 23 2015

    Fingerprint

    Augmented reality
    Equipment and Supplies
    Stiffness
    evaluation
    Aptitude
    Microsurgery
    Experiments
    experiment
    ability
    assistance
    Processing
    engineering
    Research

    Keywords

    • augmented reality
    • force perception
    • haptic interfaces
    • perceptual effectiveness
    • stiffness perception

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Human Factors and Ergonomics
    • Applied Psychology
    • Behavioral Neuroscience

    Cite this

    Wu, B., Klatzky, R., Lee, R., Shivaprabhu, V., Galeotti, J., Siegel, M., ... Stetten, G. (2015). Psychophysical evaluation of haptic perception under augmentation by a handheld device. Human Factors, 57(3), 523-537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814551414

    Psychophysical evaluation of haptic perception under augmentation by a handheld device. / Wu, Bing; Klatzky, Roberta; Lee, Randy; Shivaprabhu, Vikas; Galeotti, John; Siegel, Mel; Schuman, Joel S.; Hollis, Ralph; Stetten, George.

    In: Human Factors, Vol. 57, No. 3, 23.05.2015, p. 523-537.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    Wu, B, Klatzky, R, Lee, R, Shivaprabhu, V, Galeotti, J, Siegel, M, Schuman, JS, Hollis, R & Stetten, G 2015, 'Psychophysical evaluation of haptic perception under augmentation by a handheld device', Human Factors, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 523-537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814551414
    Wu B, Klatzky R, Lee R, Shivaprabhu V, Galeotti J, Siegel M et al. Psychophysical evaluation of haptic perception under augmentation by a handheld device. Human Factors. 2015 May 23;57(3):523-537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814551414
    Wu, Bing ; Klatzky, Roberta ; Lee, Randy ; Shivaprabhu, Vikas ; Galeotti, John ; Siegel, Mel ; Schuman, Joel S. ; Hollis, Ralph ; Stetten, George. / Psychophysical evaluation of haptic perception under augmentation by a handheld device. In: Human Factors. 2015 ; Vol. 57, No. 3. pp. 523-537.
    @article{05c6a6952ea142f49665fe8dd026136f,
    title = "Psychophysical evaluation of haptic perception under augmentation by a handheld device",
    abstract = "Objective: This study investigated the effectiveness of force augmentation in haptic perception tasks. Background: Considerable engineering effort has been devoted to developing force augmented reality (AR) systems to assist users in delicate procedures like microsurgery. In contrast, far less has been done to characterize the behavioral outcomes of these systems, and no research has systematically examined the impact of sensory and perceptual processes on force augmentation effectiveness. Method: Using a handheld force magnifier as an exemplar haptic AR, we conducted three experiments to characterize its utility in the perception of force and stiffness. Experiments 1 and 2 measured, respectively, the users ability to detect and differentiate weak force (<0.5 N) with or without the assistance of the device and compared it to direct perception. Experiment 3 examined the perception of stiffness through the force augmentation. Results: The users ability to detect and differentiate small forces was significantly improved by augmentation at both threshold and suprathreshold levels. The augmentation also enhanced stiffness perception. However, although perception of augmented forces matches that of the physical equivalent for weak forces, it falls off with increasing intensity. Conclusion: The loss in the effectiveness reflects the nature of sensory and perceptual processing. Such perceptual limitations should be taken into consideration in the design and development of haptic AR systems to maximize utility. Application: The findings provide useful information for building effective haptic AR systems, particularly for use in microsurgery.",
    keywords = "augmented reality, force perception, haptic interfaces, perceptual effectiveness, stiffness perception",
    author = "Bing Wu and Roberta Klatzky and Randy Lee and Vikas Shivaprabhu and John Galeotti and Mel Siegel and Schuman, {Joel S.} and Ralph Hollis and George Stetten",
    year = "2015",
    month = "5",
    day = "23",
    doi = "10.1177/0018720814551414",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "57",
    pages = "523--537",
    journal = "Human Factors",
    issn = "0018-7208",
    publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Psychophysical evaluation of haptic perception under augmentation by a handheld device

    AU - Wu, Bing

    AU - Klatzky, Roberta

    AU - Lee, Randy

    AU - Shivaprabhu, Vikas

    AU - Galeotti, John

    AU - Siegel, Mel

    AU - Schuman, Joel S.

    AU - Hollis, Ralph

    AU - Stetten, George

    PY - 2015/5/23

    Y1 - 2015/5/23

    N2 - Objective: This study investigated the effectiveness of force augmentation in haptic perception tasks. Background: Considerable engineering effort has been devoted to developing force augmented reality (AR) systems to assist users in delicate procedures like microsurgery. In contrast, far less has been done to characterize the behavioral outcomes of these systems, and no research has systematically examined the impact of sensory and perceptual processes on force augmentation effectiveness. Method: Using a handheld force magnifier as an exemplar haptic AR, we conducted three experiments to characterize its utility in the perception of force and stiffness. Experiments 1 and 2 measured, respectively, the users ability to detect and differentiate weak force (<0.5 N) with or without the assistance of the device and compared it to direct perception. Experiment 3 examined the perception of stiffness through the force augmentation. Results: The users ability to detect and differentiate small forces was significantly improved by augmentation at both threshold and suprathreshold levels. The augmentation also enhanced stiffness perception. However, although perception of augmented forces matches that of the physical equivalent for weak forces, it falls off with increasing intensity. Conclusion: The loss in the effectiveness reflects the nature of sensory and perceptual processing. Such perceptual limitations should be taken into consideration in the design and development of haptic AR systems to maximize utility. Application: The findings provide useful information for building effective haptic AR systems, particularly for use in microsurgery.

    AB - Objective: This study investigated the effectiveness of force augmentation in haptic perception tasks. Background: Considerable engineering effort has been devoted to developing force augmented reality (AR) systems to assist users in delicate procedures like microsurgery. In contrast, far less has been done to characterize the behavioral outcomes of these systems, and no research has systematically examined the impact of sensory and perceptual processes on force augmentation effectiveness. Method: Using a handheld force magnifier as an exemplar haptic AR, we conducted three experiments to characterize its utility in the perception of force and stiffness. Experiments 1 and 2 measured, respectively, the users ability to detect and differentiate weak force (<0.5 N) with or without the assistance of the device and compared it to direct perception. Experiment 3 examined the perception of stiffness through the force augmentation. Results: The users ability to detect and differentiate small forces was significantly improved by augmentation at both threshold and suprathreshold levels. The augmentation also enhanced stiffness perception. However, although perception of augmented forces matches that of the physical equivalent for weak forces, it falls off with increasing intensity. Conclusion: The loss in the effectiveness reflects the nature of sensory and perceptual processing. Such perceptual limitations should be taken into consideration in the design and development of haptic AR systems to maximize utility. Application: The findings provide useful information for building effective haptic AR systems, particularly for use in microsurgery.

    KW - augmented reality

    KW - force perception

    KW - haptic interfaces

    KW - perceptual effectiveness

    KW - stiffness perception

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928345800&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928345800&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1177/0018720814551414

    DO - 10.1177/0018720814551414

    M3 - Article

    VL - 57

    SP - 523

    EP - 537

    JO - Human Factors

    JF - Human Factors

    SN - 0018-7208

    IS - 3

    ER -