Psychometric evaluation of the restructured clinical scales of the MMPI-2

Leonard J. Simms, Alex Casillas, Lee Anna Clark, David Watson, Bradley Doebbeling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

76 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Conceptual overlap and heterogeneity have long been noted as weaknesses of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory's clinical scales. Restructured clinical (RC) scales recently were developed to address these concerns (A. Tellegen et al., 2003). The authors evaluated the psychometric properties of the RC scales in psychology clinic clients (N = 285) and military veterans (N = 567). The RC scales were as internally consistent as the clinical scales and correlated strongly with their original counterparts (except for RC3/Hysteria). They also were less intercorrelated, produced conceptually clearer relations with measures of personality and psychopathology, and yielded somewhat greater incremental utility than the clinical scales. Thus, the RC scales demonstrated several psychometric strengths while utilizing 60% fewer items, but the 2 sets of scales cannot be used interchangeably. Interpretive considerations are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)345-358
Number of pages14
JournalPsychological Assessment
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

MMPI
Psychometrics
Hysteria
Veterans
Psychopathology
Personality
Psychology

Keywords

  • Incremental validity
  • Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2
  • Personality assessment
  • Restructured clinical scales

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Applied Psychology

Cite this

Psychometric evaluation of the restructured clinical scales of the MMPI-2. / Simms, Leonard J.; Casillas, Alex; Clark, Lee Anna; Watson, David; Doebbeling, Bradley.

In: Psychological Assessment, Vol. 17, No. 3, 09.2005, p. 345-358.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Simms, Leonard J. ; Casillas, Alex ; Clark, Lee Anna ; Watson, David ; Doebbeling, Bradley. / Psychometric evaluation of the restructured clinical scales of the MMPI-2. In: Psychological Assessment. 2005 ; Vol. 17, No. 3. pp. 345-358.
@article{3305a56aaf8941b7871e6a1e71f9d571,
title = "Psychometric evaluation of the restructured clinical scales of the MMPI-2",
abstract = "Conceptual overlap and heterogeneity have long been noted as weaknesses of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory's clinical scales. Restructured clinical (RC) scales recently were developed to address these concerns (A. Tellegen et al., 2003). The authors evaluated the psychometric properties of the RC scales in psychology clinic clients (N = 285) and military veterans (N = 567). The RC scales were as internally consistent as the clinical scales and correlated strongly with their original counterparts (except for RC3/Hysteria). They also were less intercorrelated, produced conceptually clearer relations with measures of personality and psychopathology, and yielded somewhat greater incremental utility than the clinical scales. Thus, the RC scales demonstrated several psychometric strengths while utilizing 60{\%} fewer items, but the 2 sets of scales cannot be used interchangeably. Interpretive considerations are discussed.",
keywords = "Incremental validity, Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2, Personality assessment, Restructured clinical scales",
author = "Simms, {Leonard J.} and Alex Casillas and Clark, {Lee Anna} and David Watson and Bradley Doebbeling",
year = "2005",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1037/1040-3590.17.3.345",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "17",
pages = "345--358",
journal = "Psychological Assessment",
issn = "1040-3590",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Psychometric evaluation of the restructured clinical scales of the MMPI-2

AU - Simms, Leonard J.

AU - Casillas, Alex

AU - Clark, Lee Anna

AU - Watson, David

AU - Doebbeling, Bradley

PY - 2005/9

Y1 - 2005/9

N2 - Conceptual overlap and heterogeneity have long been noted as weaknesses of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory's clinical scales. Restructured clinical (RC) scales recently were developed to address these concerns (A. Tellegen et al., 2003). The authors evaluated the psychometric properties of the RC scales in psychology clinic clients (N = 285) and military veterans (N = 567). The RC scales were as internally consistent as the clinical scales and correlated strongly with their original counterparts (except for RC3/Hysteria). They also were less intercorrelated, produced conceptually clearer relations with measures of personality and psychopathology, and yielded somewhat greater incremental utility than the clinical scales. Thus, the RC scales demonstrated several psychometric strengths while utilizing 60% fewer items, but the 2 sets of scales cannot be used interchangeably. Interpretive considerations are discussed.

AB - Conceptual overlap and heterogeneity have long been noted as weaknesses of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory's clinical scales. Restructured clinical (RC) scales recently were developed to address these concerns (A. Tellegen et al., 2003). The authors evaluated the psychometric properties of the RC scales in psychology clinic clients (N = 285) and military veterans (N = 567). The RC scales were as internally consistent as the clinical scales and correlated strongly with their original counterparts (except for RC3/Hysteria). They also were less intercorrelated, produced conceptually clearer relations with measures of personality and psychopathology, and yielded somewhat greater incremental utility than the clinical scales. Thus, the RC scales demonstrated several psychometric strengths while utilizing 60% fewer items, but the 2 sets of scales cannot be used interchangeably. Interpretive considerations are discussed.

KW - Incremental validity

KW - Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2

KW - Personality assessment

KW - Restructured clinical scales

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=27644550516&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=27644550516&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/1040-3590.17.3.345

DO - 10.1037/1040-3590.17.3.345

M3 - Article

C2 - 16262460

AN - SCOPUS:27644550516

VL - 17

SP - 345

EP - 358

JO - Psychological Assessment

JF - Psychological Assessment

SN - 1040-3590

IS - 3

ER -