Protocols for evaluating equivalency of accelerometry-based activity monitors

Gregory J. Welk, James McClain, Barbara Ainsworth

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

79 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A wide array of accelerometer-based activity monitors has been developed to facilitate objective monitoring of physical activity behaviors, but it has proven difficult to equate outputs from different monitors. On the surface, commercially available monitors seem to be performing the same basic task-monitoring total body acceleration. However, differences in sensor properties and internal data processing have made it difficult to directly compare output from different monitors. In recent years, many new competing technologies have been released into the market, compounding the challenge of evaluating monitor equivalency and the relative strengths and limitations of different monitors. To advance physical activity assessment and improve our ability to compare results across studies using different monitors, it is important to conduct functional equivalency studies in a standardized and systematic way. This article summarizes issues associated with monitor equivalency and proposes methods for standardization and quality control in future research.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalMedicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
Volume44
Issue numberSUPPL. 1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2012

Fingerprint

Accelerometry
Quality Control
Technology

Keywords

  • accelerometers
  • activity monitors
  • assessment
  • physical activity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cite this

Protocols for evaluating equivalency of accelerometry-based activity monitors. / Welk, Gregory J.; McClain, James; Ainsworth, Barbara.

In: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, Vol. 44, No. SUPPL. 1, 01.2012.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Welk, Gregory J. ; McClain, James ; Ainsworth, Barbara. / Protocols for evaluating equivalency of accelerometry-based activity monitors. In: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 2012 ; Vol. 44, No. SUPPL. 1.
@article{62a2b256bc33492c96106ccdb77401ba,
title = "Protocols for evaluating equivalency of accelerometry-based activity monitors",
abstract = "A wide array of accelerometer-based activity monitors has been developed to facilitate objective monitoring of physical activity behaviors, but it has proven difficult to equate outputs from different monitors. On the surface, commercially available monitors seem to be performing the same basic task-monitoring total body acceleration. However, differences in sensor properties and internal data processing have made it difficult to directly compare output from different monitors. In recent years, many new competing technologies have been released into the market, compounding the challenge of evaluating monitor equivalency and the relative strengths and limitations of different monitors. To advance physical activity assessment and improve our ability to compare results across studies using different monitors, it is important to conduct functional equivalency studies in a standardized and systematic way. This article summarizes issues associated with monitor equivalency and proposes methods for standardization and quality control in future research.",
keywords = "accelerometers, activity monitors, assessment, physical activity",
author = "Welk, {Gregory J.} and James McClain and Barbara Ainsworth",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182399d8f",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "44",
journal = "Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise",
issn = "0195-9131",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "SUPPL. 1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Protocols for evaluating equivalency of accelerometry-based activity monitors

AU - Welk, Gregory J.

AU - McClain, James

AU - Ainsworth, Barbara

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - A wide array of accelerometer-based activity monitors has been developed to facilitate objective monitoring of physical activity behaviors, but it has proven difficult to equate outputs from different monitors. On the surface, commercially available monitors seem to be performing the same basic task-monitoring total body acceleration. However, differences in sensor properties and internal data processing have made it difficult to directly compare output from different monitors. In recent years, many new competing technologies have been released into the market, compounding the challenge of evaluating monitor equivalency and the relative strengths and limitations of different monitors. To advance physical activity assessment and improve our ability to compare results across studies using different monitors, it is important to conduct functional equivalency studies in a standardized and systematic way. This article summarizes issues associated with monitor equivalency and proposes methods for standardization and quality control in future research.

AB - A wide array of accelerometer-based activity monitors has been developed to facilitate objective monitoring of physical activity behaviors, but it has proven difficult to equate outputs from different monitors. On the surface, commercially available monitors seem to be performing the same basic task-monitoring total body acceleration. However, differences in sensor properties and internal data processing have made it difficult to directly compare output from different monitors. In recent years, many new competing technologies have been released into the market, compounding the challenge of evaluating monitor equivalency and the relative strengths and limitations of different monitors. To advance physical activity assessment and improve our ability to compare results across studies using different monitors, it is important to conduct functional equivalency studies in a standardized and systematic way. This article summarizes issues associated with monitor equivalency and proposes methods for standardization and quality control in future research.

KW - accelerometers

KW - activity monitors

KW - assessment

KW - physical activity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=83455186215&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=83455186215&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182399d8f

DO - 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182399d8f

M3 - Article

VL - 44

JO - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

JF - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

SN - 0195-9131

IS - SUPPL. 1

ER -