Protecting the vulnerable in brain research.

R. M. Cook-Deegan

Protecting the vulnerable in brain research.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article

Abstract

Robert M. Cook-Deegan, M.D., of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, looks at several new attempts to forge workable policy on participation in clinical brain research and warns that another unresolved clash of interests will produce only victims. Although the issues are complex, says Cook-Deegan, there is ample common ground. He recommends some principles that could help to end the costly stalemate.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	73-91
Number of pages	19
Journal	Cerebrum : the Dana forum on brain science
Volume	2
Issue number	2
State	Published - Jan 1 2000
Externally published	Yes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Medicine(all)

Access to Document

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Protecting the vulnerable in brain research.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Cook-Deegan, R. M. (2000). Protecting the vulnerable in brain research. Cerebrum : the Dana forum on brain science, 2(2), 73-91.

@article{ae5f2d241b2c4c4680ca80b4f3128908,

title = "Protecting the vulnerable in brain research.",

abstract = "Robert M. Cook-Deegan, M.D., of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, looks at several new attempts to forge workable policy on participation in clinical brain research and warns that another unresolved clash of interests will produce only victims. Although the issues are complex, says Cook-Deegan, there is ample common ground. He recommends some principles that could help to end the costly stalemate.",

author = "Cook-Deegan, {R. M.}",

year = "2000",

month = jan,

day = "1",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "2",

pages = "73--91",

journal = "Cerebrum : the Dana forum on brain science",

issn = "1524-6205",

publisher = "Dana Press",

number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Protecting the vulnerable in brain research.

AU - Cook-Deegan, R. M.

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - Robert M. Cook-Deegan, M.D., of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, looks at several new attempts to forge workable policy on participation in clinical brain research and warns that another unresolved clash of interests will produce only victims. Although the issues are complex, says Cook-Deegan, there is ample common ground. He recommends some principles that could help to end the costly stalemate.

AB - Robert M. Cook-Deegan, M.D., of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, looks at several new attempts to forge workable policy on participation in clinical brain research and warns that another unresolved clash of interests will produce only victims. Although the issues are complex, says Cook-Deegan, there is ample common ground. He recommends some principles that could help to end the costly stalemate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0007580382&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0007580382&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 15986545

AN - SCOPUS:0007580382

VL - 2

SP - 73

EP - 91

JO - Cerebrum : the Dana forum on brain science

JF - Cerebrum : the Dana forum on brain science

SN - 1524-6205

IS - 2

ER -