Protecting the vulnerable in brain research.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Robert M. Cook-Deegan, M.D., of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, looks at several new attempts to forge workable policy on participation in clinical brain research and warns that another unresolved clash of interests will produce only victims. Although the issues are complex, says Cook-Deegan, there is ample common ground. He recommends some principles that could help to end the costly stalemate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)73-91
Number of pages19
JournalCerebrum : the Dana forum on brain science
Volume2
Issue number2
StatePublished - 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Ethics
Brain
Research

Cite this

Protecting the vulnerable in brain research. / Cook-Deegan, Robert.

In: Cerebrum : the Dana forum on brain science, Vol. 2, No. 2, 2000, p. 73-91.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ae5f2d241b2c4c4680ca80b4f3128908,
title = "Protecting the vulnerable in brain research.",
abstract = "Robert M. Cook-Deegan, M.D., of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, looks at several new attempts to forge workable policy on participation in clinical brain research and warns that another unresolved clash of interests will produce only victims. Although the issues are complex, says Cook-Deegan, there is ample common ground. He recommends some principles that could help to end the costly stalemate.",
author = "Robert Cook-Deegan",
year = "2000",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "73--91",
journal = "Cerebrum : the Dana forum on brain science",
issn = "1524-6205",
publisher = "Dana Press",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Protecting the vulnerable in brain research.

AU - Cook-Deegan, Robert

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - Robert M. Cook-Deegan, M.D., of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, looks at several new attempts to forge workable policy on participation in clinical brain research and warns that another unresolved clash of interests will produce only victims. Although the issues are complex, says Cook-Deegan, there is ample common ground. He recommends some principles that could help to end the costly stalemate.

AB - Robert M. Cook-Deegan, M.D., of the Kennedy Institute of Ethics, Georgetown University, looks at several new attempts to forge workable policy on participation in clinical brain research and warns that another unresolved clash of interests will produce only victims. Although the issues are complex, says Cook-Deegan, there is ample common ground. He recommends some principles that could help to end the costly stalemate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0007580382&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0007580382&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 15986545

AN - SCOPUS:0007580382

VL - 2

SP - 73

EP - 91

JO - Cerebrum : the Dana forum on brain science

JF - Cerebrum : the Dana forum on brain science

SN - 1524-6205

IS - 2

ER -