Protecting adolescents' right to seek treatment for sexually transmitted diseases without parental consent

The Arizona experience with senate bill 1309

Kimberly D. Goodwin, Melanie M. Taylor, Erin C. Fuse Brown, Michelle Winscott, Megan Scanlon, James Hodge, Tom Mickey, Bob England

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 2010, Senate Bill 1309 included language to repeal an existing Arizona law that enables minors younger than 18 years of age to seek diagnosis and treatment of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) without parental consent. Numerous implications were identified that would have stemmed from parental consent provisions originally proffered in Senate Bill 1309. These implications included diminished access to essential health services among minors, exacerbated existing health disparities, increased health-care spending costs, and thwarted efforts to curb the spread of STDs. Lastly, minors would have been deprived of existing privacy protections concerning their STD-related medical information. This case study describes how collaborative advocacy efforts resulted in the successful amendment of Senate Bill 1309 to avert the negative sexual and reproductive health outcomes among adolescents stemming from the potential repeal of their existing legal right to seek STD treatment without parental consent.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)253-258
Number of pages6
JournalPublic Health Reports
Volume127
Issue number3
StatePublished - May 2012

Fingerprint

Parental Consent
Patient Rights
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Minors
Reproductive Health
Civil Rights
Privacy
Health Care Costs
Health Services
Language
Health
Therapeutics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Protecting adolescents' right to seek treatment for sexually transmitted diseases without parental consent : The Arizona experience with senate bill 1309. / Goodwin, Kimberly D.; Taylor, Melanie M.; Fuse Brown, Erin C.; Winscott, Michelle; Scanlon, Megan; Hodge, James; Mickey, Tom; England, Bob.

In: Public Health Reports, Vol. 127, No. 3, 05.2012, p. 253-258.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Goodwin, KD, Taylor, MM, Fuse Brown, EC, Winscott, M, Scanlon, M, Hodge, J, Mickey, T & England, B 2012, 'Protecting adolescents' right to seek treatment for sexually transmitted diseases without parental consent: The Arizona experience with senate bill 1309', Public Health Reports, vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 253-258.
Goodwin, Kimberly D. ; Taylor, Melanie M. ; Fuse Brown, Erin C. ; Winscott, Michelle ; Scanlon, Megan ; Hodge, James ; Mickey, Tom ; England, Bob. / Protecting adolescents' right to seek treatment for sexually transmitted diseases without parental consent : The Arizona experience with senate bill 1309. In: Public Health Reports. 2012 ; Vol. 127, No. 3. pp. 253-258.
@article{c323dc408d624be2b78f255343e3f3c6,
title = "Protecting adolescents' right to seek treatment for sexually transmitted diseases without parental consent: The Arizona experience with senate bill 1309",
abstract = "In 2010, Senate Bill 1309 included language to repeal an existing Arizona law that enables minors younger than 18 years of age to seek diagnosis and treatment of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) without parental consent. Numerous implications were identified that would have stemmed from parental consent provisions originally proffered in Senate Bill 1309. These implications included diminished access to essential health services among minors, exacerbated existing health disparities, increased health-care spending costs, and thwarted efforts to curb the spread of STDs. Lastly, minors would have been deprived of existing privacy protections concerning their STD-related medical information. This case study describes how collaborative advocacy efforts resulted in the successful amendment of Senate Bill 1309 to avert the negative sexual and reproductive health outcomes among adolescents stemming from the potential repeal of their existing legal right to seek STD treatment without parental consent.",
author = "Goodwin, {Kimberly D.} and Taylor, {Melanie M.} and {Fuse Brown}, {Erin C.} and Michelle Winscott and Megan Scanlon and James Hodge and Tom Mickey and Bob England",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "127",
pages = "253--258",
journal = "Public Health Reports",
issn = "0033-3549",
publisher = "Association of Schools of Public Health",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Protecting adolescents' right to seek treatment for sexually transmitted diseases without parental consent

T2 - The Arizona experience with senate bill 1309

AU - Goodwin, Kimberly D.

AU - Taylor, Melanie M.

AU - Fuse Brown, Erin C.

AU - Winscott, Michelle

AU - Scanlon, Megan

AU - Hodge, James

AU - Mickey, Tom

AU - England, Bob

PY - 2012/5

Y1 - 2012/5

N2 - In 2010, Senate Bill 1309 included language to repeal an existing Arizona law that enables minors younger than 18 years of age to seek diagnosis and treatment of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) without parental consent. Numerous implications were identified that would have stemmed from parental consent provisions originally proffered in Senate Bill 1309. These implications included diminished access to essential health services among minors, exacerbated existing health disparities, increased health-care spending costs, and thwarted efforts to curb the spread of STDs. Lastly, minors would have been deprived of existing privacy protections concerning their STD-related medical information. This case study describes how collaborative advocacy efforts resulted in the successful amendment of Senate Bill 1309 to avert the negative sexual and reproductive health outcomes among adolescents stemming from the potential repeal of their existing legal right to seek STD treatment without parental consent.

AB - In 2010, Senate Bill 1309 included language to repeal an existing Arizona law that enables minors younger than 18 years of age to seek diagnosis and treatment of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) without parental consent. Numerous implications were identified that would have stemmed from parental consent provisions originally proffered in Senate Bill 1309. These implications included diminished access to essential health services among minors, exacerbated existing health disparities, increased health-care spending costs, and thwarted efforts to curb the spread of STDs. Lastly, minors would have been deprived of existing privacy protections concerning their STD-related medical information. This case study describes how collaborative advocacy efforts resulted in the successful amendment of Senate Bill 1309 to avert the negative sexual and reproductive health outcomes among adolescents stemming from the potential repeal of their existing legal right to seek STD treatment without parental consent.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84859467369&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84859467369&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 127

SP - 253

EP - 258

JO - Public Health Reports

JF - Public Health Reports

SN - 0033-3549

IS - 3

ER -