Prosecutorial discretion to defer criminalization: The effects of defendant's ascribed and achieved status characteristics

Celesta A. Albonetti, John Hepburn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This research contributes to a further understanding of prosecutorial discretion by exploring tenets of casual attribution theory and etiology of bias theory as each informs an uncertainty avoidance perspective on the prosecutor's decision to divert felony drug defendants from criminal prosecution and into a treatment program. The sociolegal consequences of the exercise of this early screening decision are expressed by both conflict theorists and labeling theorists. Our analysis involves estimating main effects and interaction effects of defendant ascribed status and achieved status on the likelihood of diversion. The findings indicate partial support for hypotheses derived from the theoretical perspectives pursued. In addition, these findings point to a more complex model of the subjective nature of the exercise of prosecutorial discretion, a model that benefits from understanding the salience of minimizing uncertainty in the decision to criminals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)63-81
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Quantitative Criminology
Volume12
Issue number1
StatePublished - Mar 1996

Fingerprint

criminalization
Uncertainty
Exercise
uncertainty
attribution theory
prosecution
etiology
Research
Pharmaceutical Preparations
drug
trend
interaction
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • Logistic regression
  • Prosecutorial diversion
  • Uncertainty avoidance

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

Prosecutorial discretion to defer criminalization : The effects of defendant's ascribed and achieved status characteristics. / Albonetti, Celesta A.; Hepburn, John.

In: Journal of Quantitative Criminology, Vol. 12, No. 1, 03.1996, p. 63-81.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9c128d35b35e471aaa3ce5bcd5beff3b,
title = "Prosecutorial discretion to defer criminalization: The effects of defendant's ascribed and achieved status characteristics",
abstract = "This research contributes to a further understanding of prosecutorial discretion by exploring tenets of casual attribution theory and etiology of bias theory as each informs an uncertainty avoidance perspective on the prosecutor's decision to divert felony drug defendants from criminal prosecution and into a treatment program. The sociolegal consequences of the exercise of this early screening decision are expressed by both conflict theorists and labeling theorists. Our analysis involves estimating main effects and interaction effects of defendant ascribed status and achieved status on the likelihood of diversion. The findings indicate partial support for hypotheses derived from the theoretical perspectives pursued. In addition, these findings point to a more complex model of the subjective nature of the exercise of prosecutorial discretion, a model that benefits from understanding the salience of minimizing uncertainty in the decision to criminals.",
keywords = "Logistic regression, Prosecutorial diversion, Uncertainty avoidance",
author = "Albonetti, {Celesta A.} and John Hepburn",
year = "1996",
month = "3",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "63--81",
journal = "Journal of Quantitative Criminology",
issn = "0748-4518",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prosecutorial discretion to defer criminalization

T2 - The effects of defendant's ascribed and achieved status characteristics

AU - Albonetti, Celesta A.

AU - Hepburn, John

PY - 1996/3

Y1 - 1996/3

N2 - This research contributes to a further understanding of prosecutorial discretion by exploring tenets of casual attribution theory and etiology of bias theory as each informs an uncertainty avoidance perspective on the prosecutor's decision to divert felony drug defendants from criminal prosecution and into a treatment program. The sociolegal consequences of the exercise of this early screening decision are expressed by both conflict theorists and labeling theorists. Our analysis involves estimating main effects and interaction effects of defendant ascribed status and achieved status on the likelihood of diversion. The findings indicate partial support for hypotheses derived from the theoretical perspectives pursued. In addition, these findings point to a more complex model of the subjective nature of the exercise of prosecutorial discretion, a model that benefits from understanding the salience of minimizing uncertainty in the decision to criminals.

AB - This research contributes to a further understanding of prosecutorial discretion by exploring tenets of casual attribution theory and etiology of bias theory as each informs an uncertainty avoidance perspective on the prosecutor's decision to divert felony drug defendants from criminal prosecution and into a treatment program. The sociolegal consequences of the exercise of this early screening decision are expressed by both conflict theorists and labeling theorists. Our analysis involves estimating main effects and interaction effects of defendant ascribed status and achieved status on the likelihood of diversion. The findings indicate partial support for hypotheses derived from the theoretical perspectives pursued. In addition, these findings point to a more complex model of the subjective nature of the exercise of prosecutorial discretion, a model that benefits from understanding the salience of minimizing uncertainty in the decision to criminals.

KW - Logistic regression

KW - Prosecutorial diversion

KW - Uncertainty avoidance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=21344462081&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=21344462081&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:21344462081

VL - 12

SP - 63

EP - 81

JO - Journal of Quantitative Criminology

JF - Journal of Quantitative Criminology

SN - 0748-4518

IS - 1

ER -