Prosecutorial discretion

An examination of substantial assistance departures in federal crack-cocaine and powder-cocaine cases

Richard D. Hartley, Sean Maddan, Cassia Spohn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recently there has been a call for research that explores decision-making at stages prior to sentencing in the criminal justice process. Particularly research is needed under a determinate sentencing system where judicial dispositions are usually restricted by guidelines, which increases the importance of earlier decision-making stages. As an answer to this call, and in an attempt to build on currents studies on the effects of departures as an intervening mechanism, and a source of unwarranted disparity, this study explores federal sentencing data on offenders convicted of crack-cocaine and powder-cocaine offenses. Although decision-making of all criminal justice actors generally, and prosecutors specifically, has been the subject of much research, studies have yet to resolve the nature and outcome of their "autonomous" discretion. This autonomy becomes especially salient regarding prosecutorial decisions for substantial assistance departures. In deciding who receives a substantial assistance departure, the prosecutor has carte blanche power.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)382-407
Number of pages26
JournalJustice Quarterly
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2007

Fingerprint

Crack Cocaine
Cocaine
Powders
Decision Making
Criminal Law
assistance
decision making
examination
justice
Research
disposition
offender
autonomy
offense
Guidelines

Keywords

  • Crack-cocaine
  • Federal
  • Powder-cocaine
  • Prosecutorial discretion
  • Substantial assistance departures

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Cite this

Prosecutorial discretion : An examination of substantial assistance departures in federal crack-cocaine and powder-cocaine cases. / Hartley, Richard D.; Maddan, Sean; Spohn, Cassia.

In: Justice Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 3, 09.2007, p. 382-407.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{742bff77d3614727a2adce9b86f1c247,
title = "Prosecutorial discretion: An examination of substantial assistance departures in federal crack-cocaine and powder-cocaine cases",
abstract = "Recently there has been a call for research that explores decision-making at stages prior to sentencing in the criminal justice process. Particularly research is needed under a determinate sentencing system where judicial dispositions are usually restricted by guidelines, which increases the importance of earlier decision-making stages. As an answer to this call, and in an attempt to build on currents studies on the effects of departures as an intervening mechanism, and a source of unwarranted disparity, this study explores federal sentencing data on offenders convicted of crack-cocaine and powder-cocaine offenses. Although decision-making of all criminal justice actors generally, and prosecutors specifically, has been the subject of much research, studies have yet to resolve the nature and outcome of their {"}autonomous{"} discretion. This autonomy becomes especially salient regarding prosecutorial decisions for substantial assistance departures. In deciding who receives a substantial assistance departure, the prosecutor has carte blanche power.",
keywords = "Crack-cocaine, Federal, Powder-cocaine, Prosecutorial discretion, Substantial assistance departures",
author = "Hartley, {Richard D.} and Sean Maddan and Cassia Spohn",
year = "2007",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1080/07418820701485379",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "382--407",
journal = "Justice Quarterly",
issn = "0741-8825",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prosecutorial discretion

T2 - An examination of substantial assistance departures in federal crack-cocaine and powder-cocaine cases

AU - Hartley, Richard D.

AU - Maddan, Sean

AU - Spohn, Cassia

PY - 2007/9

Y1 - 2007/9

N2 - Recently there has been a call for research that explores decision-making at stages prior to sentencing in the criminal justice process. Particularly research is needed under a determinate sentencing system where judicial dispositions are usually restricted by guidelines, which increases the importance of earlier decision-making stages. As an answer to this call, and in an attempt to build on currents studies on the effects of departures as an intervening mechanism, and a source of unwarranted disparity, this study explores federal sentencing data on offenders convicted of crack-cocaine and powder-cocaine offenses. Although decision-making of all criminal justice actors generally, and prosecutors specifically, has been the subject of much research, studies have yet to resolve the nature and outcome of their "autonomous" discretion. This autonomy becomes especially salient regarding prosecutorial decisions for substantial assistance departures. In deciding who receives a substantial assistance departure, the prosecutor has carte blanche power.

AB - Recently there has been a call for research that explores decision-making at stages prior to sentencing in the criminal justice process. Particularly research is needed under a determinate sentencing system where judicial dispositions are usually restricted by guidelines, which increases the importance of earlier decision-making stages. As an answer to this call, and in an attempt to build on currents studies on the effects of departures as an intervening mechanism, and a source of unwarranted disparity, this study explores federal sentencing data on offenders convicted of crack-cocaine and powder-cocaine offenses. Although decision-making of all criminal justice actors generally, and prosecutors specifically, has been the subject of much research, studies have yet to resolve the nature and outcome of their "autonomous" discretion. This autonomy becomes especially salient regarding prosecutorial decisions for substantial assistance departures. In deciding who receives a substantial assistance departure, the prosecutor has carte blanche power.

KW - Crack-cocaine

KW - Federal

KW - Powder-cocaine

KW - Prosecutorial discretion

KW - Substantial assistance departures

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547468354&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34547468354&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/07418820701485379

DO - 10.1080/07418820701485379

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 382

EP - 407

JO - Justice Quarterly

JF - Justice Quarterly

SN - 0741-8825

IS - 3

ER -