Prosecuting sexual assault: A comparison of charging decisions in sexual assault cases involving strangers, acquaintances, and intimate partners

Cassia Spohn, David Holleran

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study of prosecutors’ charging decisions in sexual assault cases, we test the hypothesis that the effect of victim characteristics is conditioned by the relationship between the victim and the suspect. We categorize the victim/suspect relationship as one involving strangers, acquaintances/relatives, or intimate partners, and we examine the effect of victim, suspect, and case characteristics on charging decisions in each type of case. The results of our analysis reveal that the effect of victim characteristics, with one exception, is confined to cases involving acquaintances and intimate partners. In these types of cases, prosecutors were less likely to file charges if there were questions about the victim’s character or behavior at the time of the incident. In contrast, the victim’s reputation and behavior did not affect charging in cases involving strangers; in those types of cases, prosecutors were more likely to file charges if the suspect used a gun or knife or if the victim was white. We conclude that stereotypes of “real rapes” and “genuine victims” continue to influence the charging decision in at least some types of sexual assault cases.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)652-688
Number of pages37
JournalJustice Quarterly
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2001
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

assault
Rape
Firearms
charge
rape
reputation
stereotype
incident

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Cite this

@article{26de774f0a624d72a76ee6a3732f3dc3,
title = "Prosecuting sexual assault: A comparison of charging decisions in sexual assault cases involving strangers, acquaintances, and intimate partners",
abstract = "In this study of prosecutors’ charging decisions in sexual assault cases, we test the hypothesis that the effect of victim characteristics is conditioned by the relationship between the victim and the suspect. We categorize the victim/suspect relationship as one involving strangers, acquaintances/relatives, or intimate partners, and we examine the effect of victim, suspect, and case characteristics on charging decisions in each type of case. The results of our analysis reveal that the effect of victim characteristics, with one exception, is confined to cases involving acquaintances and intimate partners. In these types of cases, prosecutors were less likely to file charges if there were questions about the victim’s character or behavior at the time of the incident. In contrast, the victim’s reputation and behavior did not affect charging in cases involving strangers; in those types of cases, prosecutors were more likely to file charges if the suspect used a gun or knife or if the victim was white. We conclude that stereotypes of “real rapes” and “genuine victims” continue to influence the charging decision in at least some types of sexual assault cases.",
author = "Cassia Spohn and David Holleran",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1080/07418820100095051",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
pages = "652--688",
journal = "Justice Quarterly",
issn = "0741-8825",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prosecuting sexual assault

T2 - A comparison of charging decisions in sexual assault cases involving strangers, acquaintances, and intimate partners

AU - Spohn, Cassia

AU - Holleran, David

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - In this study of prosecutors’ charging decisions in sexual assault cases, we test the hypothesis that the effect of victim characteristics is conditioned by the relationship between the victim and the suspect. We categorize the victim/suspect relationship as one involving strangers, acquaintances/relatives, or intimate partners, and we examine the effect of victim, suspect, and case characteristics on charging decisions in each type of case. The results of our analysis reveal that the effect of victim characteristics, with one exception, is confined to cases involving acquaintances and intimate partners. In these types of cases, prosecutors were less likely to file charges if there were questions about the victim’s character or behavior at the time of the incident. In contrast, the victim’s reputation and behavior did not affect charging in cases involving strangers; in those types of cases, prosecutors were more likely to file charges if the suspect used a gun or knife or if the victim was white. We conclude that stereotypes of “real rapes” and “genuine victims” continue to influence the charging decision in at least some types of sexual assault cases.

AB - In this study of prosecutors’ charging decisions in sexual assault cases, we test the hypothesis that the effect of victim characteristics is conditioned by the relationship between the victim and the suspect. We categorize the victim/suspect relationship as one involving strangers, acquaintances/relatives, or intimate partners, and we examine the effect of victim, suspect, and case characteristics on charging decisions in each type of case. The results of our analysis reveal that the effect of victim characteristics, with one exception, is confined to cases involving acquaintances and intimate partners. In these types of cases, prosecutors were less likely to file charges if there were questions about the victim’s character or behavior at the time of the incident. In contrast, the victim’s reputation and behavior did not affect charging in cases involving strangers; in those types of cases, prosecutors were more likely to file charges if the suspect used a gun or knife or if the victim was white. We conclude that stereotypes of “real rapes” and “genuine victims” continue to influence the charging decision in at least some types of sexual assault cases.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84981243161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84981243161&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/07418820100095051

DO - 10.1080/07418820100095051

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84981243161

VL - 18

SP - 652

EP - 688

JO - Justice Quarterly

JF - Justice Quarterly

SN - 0741-8825

IS - 3

ER -