Prosecuting Intimate Partner Sexual Assault: Legal and Extra-Legal Factors That Influence Charging Decisions

Eryn Nicole O’Neal, Katharine Tellis, Cassia Spohn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prosecutors play a crucial role in determining whether persons who are accused of intimate partner sexual assault (IPSA) will be sanctioned by the criminal justice system. Prosecutors have unconditional discretion at the initial charging stage because a case rejection decision is typically immune to review. Using qualitative data from 47 IPSA complaints that were referred to Los Angeles County or City prosecution in 2008, this study examines the factors that influence charging decisions. Findings suggest that prosecutors consider both legal and extralegal factors when making charging decisions and that various cultural, legal, and rape myths surrounding IPSA influence these decisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1237-1258
Number of pages22
JournalViolence Against Women
Volume21
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2015

Fingerprint

legal factors
assault
accused
prosecution
rape
complaint
myth
justice
decision making
human being

Keywords

  • charging decisions
  • intimate partner sexual assault
  • qualitative

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gender Studies
  • Law
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

Prosecuting Intimate Partner Sexual Assault : Legal and Extra-Legal Factors That Influence Charging Decisions. / O’Neal, Eryn Nicole; Tellis, Katharine; Spohn, Cassia.

In: Violence Against Women, Vol. 21, No. 10, 01.10.2015, p. 1237-1258.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a0bd77d760ed42cba1eb7d1080360283,
title = "Prosecuting Intimate Partner Sexual Assault: Legal and Extra-Legal Factors That Influence Charging Decisions",
abstract = "Prosecutors play a crucial role in determining whether persons who are accused of intimate partner sexual assault (IPSA) will be sanctioned by the criminal justice system. Prosecutors have unconditional discretion at the initial charging stage because a case rejection decision is typically immune to review. Using qualitative data from 47 IPSA complaints that were referred to Los Angeles County or City prosecution in 2008, this study examines the factors that influence charging decisions. Findings suggest that prosecutors consider both legal and extralegal factors when making charging decisions and that various cultural, legal, and rape myths surrounding IPSA influence these decisions.",
keywords = "charging decisions, intimate partner sexual assault, qualitative",
author = "O’Neal, {Eryn Nicole} and Katharine Tellis and Cassia Spohn",
year = "2015",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1077801215591630",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "1237--1258",
journal = "Violence Against Women",
issn = "1077-8012",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prosecuting Intimate Partner Sexual Assault

T2 - Legal and Extra-Legal Factors That Influence Charging Decisions

AU - O’Neal, Eryn Nicole

AU - Tellis, Katharine

AU - Spohn, Cassia

PY - 2015/10/1

Y1 - 2015/10/1

N2 - Prosecutors play a crucial role in determining whether persons who are accused of intimate partner sexual assault (IPSA) will be sanctioned by the criminal justice system. Prosecutors have unconditional discretion at the initial charging stage because a case rejection decision is typically immune to review. Using qualitative data from 47 IPSA complaints that were referred to Los Angeles County or City prosecution in 2008, this study examines the factors that influence charging decisions. Findings suggest that prosecutors consider both legal and extralegal factors when making charging decisions and that various cultural, legal, and rape myths surrounding IPSA influence these decisions.

AB - Prosecutors play a crucial role in determining whether persons who are accused of intimate partner sexual assault (IPSA) will be sanctioned by the criminal justice system. Prosecutors have unconditional discretion at the initial charging stage because a case rejection decision is typically immune to review. Using qualitative data from 47 IPSA complaints that were referred to Los Angeles County or City prosecution in 2008, this study examines the factors that influence charging decisions. Findings suggest that prosecutors consider both legal and extralegal factors when making charging decisions and that various cultural, legal, and rape myths surrounding IPSA influence these decisions.

KW - charging decisions

KW - intimate partner sexual assault

KW - qualitative

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84940658249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84940658249&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1077801215591630

DO - 10.1177/1077801215591630

M3 - Article

C2 - 26134710

AN - SCOPUS:84940658249

VL - 21

SP - 1237

EP - 1258

JO - Violence Against Women

JF - Violence Against Women

SN - 1077-8012

IS - 10

ER -