Prompts to increase physical activity at points-of-choice between stairs and escalators: What about escalator climbers?

John Bellettiere, Ben Nguyen, Sandy Liles, Vincent Berardi, Marc A. Adams, Paddy Dempsey, Yael Benporat, Jacqueline Kerr, Andrea Z. LaCroix, Melbourne Hovell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Since 1980, many studies have evaluated whether stair-use prompts increased physical activity by quantifying changes in stair use. To more completely evaluate changes in physical activity, this study addressed the often-overlooked assessment of climbing up escalators by evaluating the degree to which stair-use sign prompts increased active ascent-defined as stair use or escalator climbing. Over 5 months, at an airport stairs/escalator point of choice, we video-recorded passersby (N = 13,544) who ascended either stairs or escalators, on 10 days with signs and 10 days without signs. Ascenders using the stairs, standing on the escalator, and climbing the escalator were compared on days with versus without signs using multivariable logistic regression. The percentage of ascenders on days with versus without signs were as follows: stair use, 6.9 versus 3.6 percent; escalator standing, 75.2 versus 76.0 percent; and escalator climbing, 18.5 versus 20.4 percent. Signs more than doubled the odds of stair use (vs. escalator use; OR = 2.25; 95% CI = 1.90-2.68; p < .001). Signs decreased the odds of escalator climbing (vs. escalator standing or stair use); OR = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.82−0.99; p = .028). Signs increased the odds of active ascent versus escalator standing by 15 percent (OR = 1.15; 95% CI = 1.05-1.25; p = .002). Although stair-use prompts increased stair use more than twofold (125%), they increased active ascent by only 15 percent, partly because escalator climbing-a behavior not targeted by the intervention-decreased. Although our results corroborated the established consensus that point-of-choice prompts increase stair use, future studies should test interventions designed to increase active ascent.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)656-662
Number of pages7
JournalTranslational Behavioral Medicine
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Elevators and Escalators
Airports

Keywords

  • Active ascent
  • Built environment
  • Escalator
  • Physical activity
  • Point-of-choice prompts
  • Stairs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Applied Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Prompts to increase physical activity at points-of-choice between stairs and escalators : What about escalator climbers? / Bellettiere, John; Nguyen, Ben; Liles, Sandy; Berardi, Vincent; Adams, Marc A.; Dempsey, Paddy; Benporat, Yael; Kerr, Jacqueline; LaCroix, Andrea Z.; Hovell, Melbourne.

In: Translational Behavioral Medicine, Vol. 9, No. 4, 01.01.2019, p. 656-662.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bellettiere, J, Nguyen, B, Liles, S, Berardi, V, Adams, MA, Dempsey, P, Benporat, Y, Kerr, J, LaCroix, AZ & Hovell, M 2019, 'Prompts to increase physical activity at points-of-choice between stairs and escalators: What about escalator climbers?', Translational Behavioral Medicine, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 656-662. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/iby080
Bellettiere, John ; Nguyen, Ben ; Liles, Sandy ; Berardi, Vincent ; Adams, Marc A. ; Dempsey, Paddy ; Benporat, Yael ; Kerr, Jacqueline ; LaCroix, Andrea Z. ; Hovell, Melbourne. / Prompts to increase physical activity at points-of-choice between stairs and escalators : What about escalator climbers?. In: Translational Behavioral Medicine. 2019 ; Vol. 9, No. 4. pp. 656-662.
@article{48f49ca02d764c2b96041acf1b9725ad,
title = "Prompts to increase physical activity at points-of-choice between stairs and escalators: What about escalator climbers?",
abstract = "Since 1980, many studies have evaluated whether stair-use prompts increased physical activity by quantifying changes in stair use. To more completely evaluate changes in physical activity, this study addressed the often-overlooked assessment of climbing up escalators by evaluating the degree to which stair-use sign prompts increased active ascent-defined as stair use or escalator climbing. Over 5 months, at an airport stairs/escalator point of choice, we video-recorded passersby (N = 13,544) who ascended either stairs or escalators, on 10 days with signs and 10 days without signs. Ascenders using the stairs, standing on the escalator, and climbing the escalator were compared on days with versus without signs using multivariable logistic regression. The percentage of ascenders on days with versus without signs were as follows: stair use, 6.9 versus 3.6 percent; escalator standing, 75.2 versus 76.0 percent; and escalator climbing, 18.5 versus 20.4 percent. Signs more than doubled the odds of stair use (vs. escalator use; OR = 2.25; 95{\%} CI = 1.90-2.68; p < .001). Signs decreased the odds of escalator climbing (vs. escalator standing or stair use); OR = 0.90; 95{\%} CI = 0.82−0.99; p = .028). Signs increased the odds of active ascent versus escalator standing by 15 percent (OR = 1.15; 95{\%} CI = 1.05-1.25; p = .002). Although stair-use prompts increased stair use more than twofold (125{\%}), they increased active ascent by only 15 percent, partly because escalator climbing-a behavior not targeted by the intervention-decreased. Although our results corroborated the established consensus that point-of-choice prompts increase stair use, future studies should test interventions designed to increase active ascent.",
keywords = "Active ascent, Built environment, Escalator, Physical activity, Point-of-choice prompts, Stairs",
author = "John Bellettiere and Ben Nguyen and Sandy Liles and Vincent Berardi and Adams, {Marc A.} and Paddy Dempsey and Yael Benporat and Jacqueline Kerr and LaCroix, {Andrea Z.} and Melbourne Hovell",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/tbm/iby080",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "656--662",
journal = "Translational Behavioral Medicine",
issn = "1869-6716",
publisher = "Springer Publishing Company",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prompts to increase physical activity at points-of-choice between stairs and escalators

T2 - What about escalator climbers?

AU - Bellettiere, John

AU - Nguyen, Ben

AU - Liles, Sandy

AU - Berardi, Vincent

AU - Adams, Marc A.

AU - Dempsey, Paddy

AU - Benporat, Yael

AU - Kerr, Jacqueline

AU - LaCroix, Andrea Z.

AU - Hovell, Melbourne

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Since 1980, many studies have evaluated whether stair-use prompts increased physical activity by quantifying changes in stair use. To more completely evaluate changes in physical activity, this study addressed the often-overlooked assessment of climbing up escalators by evaluating the degree to which stair-use sign prompts increased active ascent-defined as stair use or escalator climbing. Over 5 months, at an airport stairs/escalator point of choice, we video-recorded passersby (N = 13,544) who ascended either stairs or escalators, on 10 days with signs and 10 days without signs. Ascenders using the stairs, standing on the escalator, and climbing the escalator were compared on days with versus without signs using multivariable logistic regression. The percentage of ascenders on days with versus without signs were as follows: stair use, 6.9 versus 3.6 percent; escalator standing, 75.2 versus 76.0 percent; and escalator climbing, 18.5 versus 20.4 percent. Signs more than doubled the odds of stair use (vs. escalator use; OR = 2.25; 95% CI = 1.90-2.68; p < .001). Signs decreased the odds of escalator climbing (vs. escalator standing or stair use); OR = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.82−0.99; p = .028). Signs increased the odds of active ascent versus escalator standing by 15 percent (OR = 1.15; 95% CI = 1.05-1.25; p = .002). Although stair-use prompts increased stair use more than twofold (125%), they increased active ascent by only 15 percent, partly because escalator climbing-a behavior not targeted by the intervention-decreased. Although our results corroborated the established consensus that point-of-choice prompts increase stair use, future studies should test interventions designed to increase active ascent.

AB - Since 1980, many studies have evaluated whether stair-use prompts increased physical activity by quantifying changes in stair use. To more completely evaluate changes in physical activity, this study addressed the often-overlooked assessment of climbing up escalators by evaluating the degree to which stair-use sign prompts increased active ascent-defined as stair use or escalator climbing. Over 5 months, at an airport stairs/escalator point of choice, we video-recorded passersby (N = 13,544) who ascended either stairs or escalators, on 10 days with signs and 10 days without signs. Ascenders using the stairs, standing on the escalator, and climbing the escalator were compared on days with versus without signs using multivariable logistic regression. The percentage of ascenders on days with versus without signs were as follows: stair use, 6.9 versus 3.6 percent; escalator standing, 75.2 versus 76.0 percent; and escalator climbing, 18.5 versus 20.4 percent. Signs more than doubled the odds of stair use (vs. escalator use; OR = 2.25; 95% CI = 1.90-2.68; p < .001). Signs decreased the odds of escalator climbing (vs. escalator standing or stair use); OR = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.82−0.99; p = .028). Signs increased the odds of active ascent versus escalator standing by 15 percent (OR = 1.15; 95% CI = 1.05-1.25; p = .002). Although stair-use prompts increased stair use more than twofold (125%), they increased active ascent by only 15 percent, partly because escalator climbing-a behavior not targeted by the intervention-decreased. Although our results corroborated the established consensus that point-of-choice prompts increase stair use, future studies should test interventions designed to increase active ascent.

KW - Active ascent

KW - Built environment

KW - Escalator

KW - Physical activity

KW - Point-of-choice prompts

KW - Stairs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85073053692&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85073053692&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/tbm/iby080

DO - 10.1093/tbm/iby080

M3 - Article

C2 - 30099542

AN - SCOPUS:85073053692

VL - 9

SP - 656

EP - 662

JO - Translational Behavioral Medicine

JF - Translational Behavioral Medicine

SN - 1869-6716

IS - 4

ER -