Promoting vicarious learning of physics using deep questions with explanations

Scotty D. Craig, Barry Gholson, Joshua K. Brittingham, Joah L. Williams, Keith T. Shubeck

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

Two experiments explored the role of vicarious "self" explanations in facilitating student learning gains during computer-presented instruction. In Exp. 1, college students with low or high knowledge on Newton's laws were tested in four conditions: (a) monologue (M), (b) questions (Q), (c) explanation (E), and (d) question + explanation (Q + E). Those with low pre-experimental knowledge levels showed marginally significant yet consistently greater gains than those with high levels and condition Q + E outperformed the other three (M, Q, E). Among those with high knowledge, the Q + E presentations actually inhibited learning. In Exp. 2, high school physics students in standard and honors classes were studied during their introduction to Newton's laws. Brief (12 min) computer videos that introduced key Newtonian concepts preceded teacher presentations in seven daily sessions. Both standard and honors students who received Q + E presentations prior to regular classroom activities learned more in daily sessions than those who received either M or Q presentations. It was concluded that when key concepts are introduced in the context of deep questions along with explanations new learning was facilitated both in vicarious environments and in subsequent standard classroom activities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1042-1048
Number of pages7
JournalComputers and Education
Volume58
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2012
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Explanations
  • Physics
  • Questions
  • Vicarious learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Computer Science(all)
  • Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Promoting vicarious learning of physics using deep questions with explanations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this